Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AIDS Behav ; 24(3): 775-781, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31407213

ABSTRACT

In the United States, high rates of HIV infection among persons who engage in transactional sex are partially driven by substance use. Little is known about transactional sex among rural populations of people who inject drugs (PWID). Using data from a 2018 survey of 420 rural PWID in West Virginia, we used logistic regression to identify correlates of recent transactional sex (past 6 months). Most study participants were male (61.2%), white (83.6%), and reported having injected heroin (81.0%) in the past 6 months. Nearly one-fifth (18.3%) reported engaging in recent transactional sex. Independent correlates of transactional sex were: being female [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.90; 95% CI 2.12-7.16]; being a sexual minority (aOR 3.07; 95% CI 1.60-5.87); being single (aOR 3.22; 95% CI 1.73-6.01); receptive syringe sharing (aOR 3.13; 95% CI 1.73-5.66); and number of injections per day (aOR 1.08; 95% CI 1.01-1.15). Rural PWID who engage in transactional sex are characterized by multiple vulnerabilities that increase their HIV risk.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Needle Sharing/statistics & numerical data , Risk-Taking , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Sex Work/statistics & numerical data , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rural Health , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Surveys and Questionnaires , West Virginia/epidemiology
2.
Subst Use Misuse ; 55(2): 337-344, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31591948

ABSTRACT

Background: While prior research has explored factors associated with people who inject drugs (PWID) initiating others into drug injection in urban settings, very little work has been done to understand this behavior among rural PWID in Appalachia. Objectives: We aim to identify factors associated with PWID initiating injection-naïve individuals into drug injection in a rural community in West Virginia (WV). Methods: Data were derived from a cross-sectional survey of 420 rural PWID (163 women) in Cabell County, WV in June-July 2018 who indicated recent (past 6 months) injection drug use. Individuals completed a survey that included measures on socio-demographics and injection socialization behaviors. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with PWID recently initiating someone for their first injection. Results: A minority (17%) reported recently initiating someone for their first injection. In multivariable regression, recent injection initiation was independently associated with number of injections per day (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.07,1.25), recent injection in front of an injection-naïve person (aOR 2.75; 95% CI: 1.25,6.04), recent describing how to inject drugs to an injection-naïve person (aOR 5.83; 95% CI: 2.71,12.57), and recent encouragement of an injection-naïve person to inject (aOR 7.13; 95% CI: 2.31,21.87). Conclusion: Injection initiation was independently associated with several injection socialization behaviors involving injection-naïve individuals. PWID who recently initiated injection-naïve individuals had higher odds of frequent injection. Educating rural PWID about how their behaviors can influence others and the importance of engaging in safe injection practices could carry significant public health utility.


Subject(s)
Interpersonal Relations , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , West Virginia , Young Adult
3.
W V Med J ; 111(4): 30-7, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26242030

ABSTRACT

This study uses data from a 2013 survey of 275 randomly sampled households across nine counties in western West Virginia to examine the significant differences between the health behaviors and attitudes of rural and isolated populations. The results show that age, education, and income are significant factors in explaining differences in health-related behaviors and attitudes for all urban, rural and isolated respondents. However, after controlling for socio-demographic differences, isolation is found to have only a few significant effects, and some of the effects run counter to stereotypes of isolated populations. Rural respondents are significantly more likely than isolated respondents to be obese and to have ever been diagnosed with hypertension. Rural Respondents are significantly less likely than isolated respondents to have annual dental or medical checkups, to engage in physical activity during the spring months, and to raise their own chickens and cattle for food.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Health Behavior , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , West Virginia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...