ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective in adults with diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF) based on randomized clinical trials. We compared SGLT2 inhibitor uptake and outcomes in two cohorts: a population-based cohort of all adults with DM and HF in Alberta, Canada and a specialized heart function clinic (HFC) cohort. METHODS: The population-based cohort was derived from linked provincial healthcare datasets. The specialized clinic cohort was created by chart review of consecutive patients prospectively enrolled in the HFC between February 2018 and August 2022. We examined the association between SGLT2 inhibitor use (modeled as a time-varying covariate) and all-cause mortality or deaths/cardiovascular hospitalizations. RESULTS: Of the 4,885 individuals from the population-based cohort, 64.2% met the eligibility criteria of the trials proving the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors. Utilization of SGLT2 inhibitors increased from 1.2% in 2017 to 26.4% by January 2022. In comparison, of the 530 patients followed in the HFC, SGLT2 inhibitor use increased from 9.8% in 2019 to 49.1 % by March 2022. SGLT2 inhibitor use in the population-based cohort was associated with fewer all-cause mortality (aHR 0.51, 95%CI 0.41-0.63) and deaths/cardiovascular hospitalizations (aHR 0.65, 95%CI 0.54-0.77). However, SGLT2 inhibitor usage rates were far lower in HF patients without DM (3.5% by March 2022 in the HFC cohort). CONCLUSIONS: Despite robust randomized trial evidence of clinical benefit, the uptake of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with HF and DM remains low, even in the specialized HFC. Clinical care strategies are needed to enhance the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and improve implementation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Self-management skills improve outcomes for patients with cirrhosis. While education programs exist to teach these skills, there are limited patient assessments to evaluate their efficacy. We aimed to develop and evaluate cirrhosis knowledge assessments for patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: Across two institutions, a 4-stage process was undertaken: first, we developed a comprehensive set of questions regarding cirrhosis self-management. Second, the questions underwent critical review by patients and hepatology providers. Third, patients with cirrhosis answered these questions before and after a written educational tool. Questions were updated based on results. Fourth, patients answered the updated questions before and after a video educational tool. Binomial test or paired sample t-test was used to compare pre- and post-tests depending on question type. RESULTS: In phase 3, 134 patients completed pre- and post-tests. 44% were decompensated, 81% were diagnosed with cirrhosis at least 3 years, and 52% were 60-75 years. 95% of single-answer questions were answered correctly by at least 70% of patients in the pre-test. None of the answers improved significantly with education. After phase 3, 6 questions were removed and 6 questions were edited to increase challenge. In phase 4, 96 patients (42 compensated, 54 decompensated) completed pre- and post-tests. In the compensated assessment, 3 questions improved after education and the summative score increased (7.9 to 9.0, P < 0.001). In the decompensated assessment, 4 questions improved after education and the summative score increased (7.0 to 7.7, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Through a rigorous process, we created and evaluated cirrhosis knowledge assessments for patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Further validation is required and then these assessments can be used to improve patient education.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Liver Cirrhosis , Self-Management , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/therapy , Patient Education as Topic , Middle Aged , AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hospitalization is a high-risk period for cirrhosis-associated sarcopenia and frailty. This study aimed to measure the knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns (KAP) of multidisciplinary cirrhosis providers about inhospital nutrition and physical activity care. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of cirrhosis care providers at a combination of 38 hospitals and healthcare centres in Alberta, Canada. Analysis included descriptive statistics and content analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-eight responses were analyzed. Across all providers, nutrition and physical activity knowledge and attitude (KA) scores were higher than practice (P) scores. Physicians had lower nutrition KA ( P = 0.010) and nutrition P ( P < 0.001) scores than nonphysicians. Previous cirrhosis-related nutrition or physical activity education was associated with higher nutrition KA ( P < 0.001), nutrition P ( P = 0.036), and physical activity P scores ( P < 0.001). Over half of the participants reported not providing patients with educational resources for nutrition or physical activity and not carrying out nutrition screening. Participant suggestions to optimize care included enhancing patient and provider education, standardizing screening and intervention processes, increasing patient-centered support, and promoting collaboration within the healthcare team. Eighty percentage of participants were willing to provide patients with resources if these were readily available. CONCLUSION: While provider knowledge and attitudes about the importance of nutrition and physical activity in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis are reasonable, there is considerable room to optimize the delivery of best practices in this patient population. Optimization will require readily available educational and personnel resources and interdisciplinary collaboration to promote system change.
