ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: S1P is an important factor regulating the function of the vascular endothelial barrier. SphK1 is an important limiting enzyme for the synthesis of S1P. However, the role of the SphK1/S1P-mediated vascular endothelial barrier function in atherosclerosis has not been fully revealed. This study explored the roles and mechanisms of SphK1 on atherosclerosis in vivo and in vitro. METHODS: In vivo, ApoE-/- and SphK1-/-ApoE-/- mice were fed a high-fat diet to induce atherosclerosis. In vitro, ox-LDL induced HUVECs to establish a cell model. Aortic histological changes were measured by H&E staining, Oil Red O staining, EVG staining, Sirius scarlet staining, immunofluorescence, and Evans Blue Assay. Western blotting was performed to explore the specific mechanism. RESULTS: We validated that deficiency of SphK1 resulted in a marked amelioration of atherosclerosis, as indicated by the decreased lipid accumulation, inflammatory factors, oxidative stress, aortic plaque area, inflammatory factor infiltration, VCAM-1 expression, and vascular endothelial permeability. Moreover, deficiency of SphK1 downregulated the expression of aortic S1PR3, Rhoa, ROCK, and F-actin. The results of administration with the SphK1 inhibitor PF-543 and the S1PR3 inhibitor VPC23019 in vitro further confirmed the conclusion that deficiency of SphK1 reduced S1P level and S1PR3 protein expression, inhibited Rhoa/ROCK signaling pathway, regulated protein expression of F-actin, improved vascular endothelial dysfunction and permeability, and exerted anti-atherosclerotic effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that deficiency of SphK1 relieved vascular endothelial barrier function in atherosclerosis mice via SphK1/S1P/S1PR signaling pathway.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been reported to have a superior validity over PCR with amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS-PCR) for detecting the BRAF V600E mutation in thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples using cytological diagnosis as the reference. However, the added value of ddPCR on surgical decision-making remains to be illustrated when the technique is combined with FNA cytology. METHODS: A total of 277 consecutive patients with thyroid nodules were subjected to FNA cytology and BRAF V600E testing with ARMS-PCR. Within this patient cohort, 90 patients underwent surgical intervention with pathological diagnosis available. BRAF V600E testing with ddPCR was performed retrospectively using FNA frozen DNA specimens. The clinical validity and utility of ddPCR in comparison with ARMS-PCR were compared using surgical pathology as the reference. RESULTS: Overall, 101 BRAF V600E mutations were detected by ddPCR, including five ARMS negative patients, four of whom were confirmed to have papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) by surgical pathology. Of the 90 patients with surgical pathology, which is considered the gold standard, ddPCR BRAF V600E testing yielded a sensitivity of 91.3% and specificity of 100% for PTC diagnosis, higher than that of ARMS (sensitivity 83.1%, specificity 100%). However, ddPCR only identified one more candidate patient for surgical intervention than ARMS when the techniques were combined with cytology. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the superior performance of ddPCR over ARMS in BRAF V600E detection from thyroid nodule FNA samples. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of replacing ARMS-PCR with ddPCR for surgical decision-making.
