[Feasibility and application value of autonomic nerve-preserving D3 radical resection for right-sided colon cancer under laparoscope].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility and application value of the preservation of vegetative nervous functions in radical resection for right-sided colon cancer. METHODS: Clinical data of 55 cases with right-sided colon cancer undergoing laparoscopic D3+ complete mesocolic excision (CME) radical resection from January 2016 to July 2017 at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of Guangdong Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were retrospectively analyzed. Exclusion criteria included emergency surgery for various reasons, intestinal obstruction or perforation, distant metastasis or locally advanced cancer, previous history of abdominal surgery and preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Twenty-nine cases underwent lymphadenectomy with intrathecal dissection of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and part of superior mesenteric plexus was resected (nerve partial resection group, NPR group). Twenty-six cases received lymphadenectomy with the clearance of lymphatic adipose tissue on the right side of SMA by sharp or obtuse method outside the sheath; the sheath of superior mesenteric vein (SMV) was entered at the junction of SMA and SMV; the SMV was naked in the sheath; the third station lymph node dissection was completed with preservation of superior mesenteric plexus (nerve preserved group, NP group). Intra-operative and postoperative complications were compared between two groups. RESULTS: The baseline data were not significantly different between two groups (all P>0.05). The operation time in NP group was significantly shorter than that in NPR group [(164.0±19.8) minutes vs. (176.0±19.7) minutes, t=2.249, P=0.029]. No significant differences in operative blood loss, operative vessel damage, postoperative time to flatus, postoperative hospital stay and abdominal pain were observed between two groups(all P>0.05). The number of harvested lymph node in two groups was 28.5±7.8 and 27.6±6.5 respectively without significant difference(P>0.05). As compared to NPR group, NP group had lower incidence of chylous leakage[3.8%(1/26) vs. 37.9%(11/29), χ²=9.337, P=0.002] and postoperative diarrhea [15.4%(4/26) vs. 41.4%(12/29), χ²=4.491, P=0.034]. CONCLUSION: Autonomic nerve-preserving D3+ CME radical resection for right-sided colon cancer is safe and feasible, and can prevent the postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction caused by nerve injury and decrease the risk of chylous leakage.

Laparoscopic resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in esophagogastric junction (EGJ): how to protect the EGJ.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is now widely performed. However, laparoscopic resection of GIST in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is technically difficult and rarely reported. Herein, we introduce four fashions of laparoscopic resection for EGJ-GIST. METHODS: A retrospective review of 42 consecutive patients with EGJ-GIST who underwent attempted laparoscopic surgery was conducted. EGJ-GIST was defined as GIST with an upper border of less than 5 cm from the esophagogastric line. Four fashions of laparoscopic resection were performed: fashion A, laparoscopic wedge resection using linear stapler; fashion B, laparoscopic complete resection by opening the stomach wall and closing with suture or linear stapler; fashion C, laparoscopic mucosa-preserving resection; and fashion D, laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with pyloroplasty and gastric plication. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative course, and short-term and long-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: All procedures were completed successfully without operative complications. In 24 of 42 (57.1%) patients, tumors were located in the fundus or greater curvature. Out of those, 70.8% (17/24) received fashion A and 29.2% (7/24) received fashion B. Tumors in 16 of 42 (38.1%) patients were located in the lesser curvature. Of those, 81.3% (13/16) underwent fashion B and 18.7% (3/16) underwent fashion D. One tumor in the anterior stomach wall and one in the posterior wall received fashion C. The mean operative time was 103.8 ± 22.1 min and the mean estimated blood loss was 22.4 ± 13.5 ml. The mean time to flatus was 40.3 ± 12.9 h and the time to fluid intake was 43.2 ± 14.3 h. The mean hospital stay was 4.8 ± 2.1 days. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for EGJ-GIST is safe and feasible. The selection of various laparoscopic resection fashions should be chosen based on tumor location and the surgeon's experience.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatectomy of Nonductal Adenocarcinomatous Pancreatic Tumor (NDACPT) in the Pancreatic Body and Tail.

BACKGROUND: Currently, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is regarded as a safe and effective surgical approach for lesions in the body and tail of the pancreas. This review examined the evidence from published data of comparative studies of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy of nonductal adenocarcinomatous pancreatic tumor in pancreatic body and tail. METHODS: A systematic review of the studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy was conducted. Comparative studies published between January 1996 and June 2016 were included. Studies were selected on the basis of specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. These 2 techniques were compared regarding several outcomes of interest, which were divided into preoperative, operative, postoperative, and pathologic characteristics, postoperative biomarker, and hospital stay cost. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis partially confirmed the robustness of these data. RESULTS: Ten comparative case-control studies involving 712 patients (53.7% laparoscopic and 46.3% open), who underwent a distal pancreatectomy were included. The results favored laparoscopy with regard to intraoperative blood loss (P=0.0001), the rate of blood transfusion (P=0.02), total hospital stay (P=0.004), postoperative hospital stay (P<0.0001), overall morbidity (P=0.0002), the rate of wound infection (P=0.05), time to initial feeds (P<0.0001), first flatus time (P=0.008), duration of pain-killer intake (P=0.0003), and C-reactive protein on postoperative day 1 (P=<0.0001). In the subgroup analysis, excluding western country studies, operation time changed to have a statistically significant difference between these 2 groups (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection results in improved operative and postoperative outcomes compared with open surgery according to the results of the present meta-analysis. It may be a safe and feasible option for nonductal adenocarcinomatous pancreatic tumor patients in pancreatic body and tail. However, randomized controlled trials should be undertaken to confirm the relevance of these findings.

Laparoscopic caudal-to-cranial approach for radical lymph node dissection in right hemicolectomy.

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the safety and feasibility of this caudal-to-cranial laparoscopic dissection approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer. To the best of our knowledge, no study has reported the caudal-to-cranial approach in the laparoscopic right colectomy with curative intent for colon cancer. METHOD: The key procedure of the caudal-to-cranial approach is the commencement of the dissection at the mesentery root, thus entering into the Toldt's space before the mesenteric vessels are accessed. We retrospectively analyzed the data obtained from a prospectively established database on 80 consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with caudally approached radical lymph node dissection for curable right-sided colon cancer between June 2014 and June 2015. RESULTS: There were 38 male and 42 female patients, with a mean age of 72.5 years (range, 53-83) and a mean BMI of 22.1 kg/m(2) (16.5-35.2). All procedures were successful without any serious intraoperative complications or any conversion to open surgery. The mean operation time was 178.3 min (range, 150-215), and the mean blood loss was 81.6 ml (range, 50-200). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 19 (range, 12-25). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that laparoscopic caudal-to-cranial approach for radical lymph node dissection is a feasible and safe procedure for the treatment of curable right-sided colon cancer.

Laparoscopic Radical Extended Right Hemicolectomy Using a Caudal-to-Cranial Approach.

BACKGROUND: Due to the emphasis of oncologic principle, a medial-to-lateral approach for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was recommended.1 (,) 2 This approach, however, is technically challenging and involves several limitations with overweight patients, whose mesocolon may be too thick for identification of the vessel landmarks. Moreover, it is difficult for inexperienced surgeons to enter the retroperitoneum space accurately. This report describes a caudal-to-cranial approach for laparoscopic radical extended right hemicolectomy. METHODS: First, a "yellow-white borderline" between the right mesostenium and retroperitoneum in the right iliac fossa is dissected as the entry for separation of the fusion fascial space between the visceral and parietal peritoneum.3 The right Toldt's fascia is dissected and expanded medial to the periphery of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), cranial to the pancreas head, and lateral to the ascending colon. The posterior paries of ileocolic vessels (ICVs), right colic vessels (RCVs), and Henle's trunk are exposed. Second, the mesocolon between the ICV and SMV is dissected safely, and the ICV, RCV, and right gastroepiploic vessels as well as the right branch of the middle colic vessel are divided and ligated easily because of the separated retroperitoneal space. The lymph nodes along the SMV are dissected using a caudal-to-cranial approach. Third, the greater omental is dissected for full mobilization of the mesocolon containing 10 cm of normal colon distal to the lesion followed by complete mobilization of the lateral attachments of the ascending colon. RESULTS: In this study, 10 men and 8 women with hepatic flexure cancer underwent laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy using a caudal-to-cranial approach. No conversion was recorded. The overall complication rate was 11.2 %, including one case of pulmonary infection and one case of urinary tract infection, both of which were cured with conservative measures. The mean age of the patients was 61.3 ± 12.7 years, and the mean body mass index was 22.1 ± 4.5 kg/m(2). The mean operative time was 187.5 ± 47.7 min, and the mean blood loss was 100.4 ± 45.2 ml. The mean first time of flatus was 57.7 ± 26.3 h, and the time of fluid intake was 62.9 ± 29.2 h. The hospital stay was 8.5 ± 4.2 days. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved was 37.3 ± 12.8. CONCLUSIONS: The initial results suggest that the reported approach may be a safe alternative to the conventional medial-to-lateral approach, especially for inexperienced surgeons. The main advantages of the current approach are easy access to the retroperitoneal space by protection of the ureter, safe dissection of lymph nodes along the SMV, and a potentially shortened learning curve.

Totally laparoscopic complete bursectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy in radical total gastrectomy: an outside bursa omentalis approach.

BACKGROUND: Bursectomy is regarded as a standard surgical procedure during gastrectomy for serosa-positive gastric cancer in Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines (Japanese Gastric Cancer Association in Gastric Cancer 14:113-123, 2011). As a consequence, bursectomy is widely performed in open gastrectomy. However, laparoscopic gastrectomy with bursectomy is rare. Based on our previous experience of laparoscopic bursectomy in distal gastrectomy (Zou et al. in Oncol Lett 10:99-102, 2015), herein, we described the technique of totally laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy with complete bursectomy using an outside bursa omentalis approach. METHODS: Firstly, the transverse mesocolon and distal gastric membrane were separated from right to left, and the right gastroepiploica vessels were ligated at root with No. 6 lymph nodes (LNs) dissection followed by the pancreas membrane dissection from pancreas head to pancreas tail. Secondly, the anterior plane of transverse mesocolon was dissected from left to right starting from the lower pole of spleen, and the membrane of pancreas tail was separated to combine the pancreas anterior plane with No. 4s, 10, 11d and 2 LNs dissection. Thirdly, the lesser omental was dissected from right to left with No. 5 and 12a LNs dissection, and the duodenum was transected. Then, the No. 7, 8, 9 and 11p LNs were dissected followed by No. 1 LNs dissection. Finally, a Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy was carried out intracorporeally with a linear cutter. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with complete bursectomy using an approach outside bursa omentalis. One bowel obstruction and one pulmonary infection were recorded and cured with conservative measure. The mean operative time was 253.3 ± 31.3 min with a mean blood loss of 90.5 ± 23.1 ml. The mean length of stay was 10.6 ± 2.6 days. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy with complete bursectomy using an outside bursa omentalis approach is feasible and safe in experienced hands with favorable short outcome. Further studies were needed for its advanced application.

[Efficacy analysis of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy using caudal-to-cranial approach].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy using caudal-to-cranial approach (yellow-white borderline between right mesostenium and retroperitoneal is firstly cut as the entry to dissect the fusion fascial space between the visceral and parietal peritoneum, which is called caudal-to-cranial approach for right hemicolectomy). METHODS: From January 2014 to May 2015, 76 consecutive patients with right side colon cancer underwent laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy using caudal-to-cranial approach. The baseline characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were prospective collected and reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: All the 76 patients completed operations successfully, and one patient (1.3%) was converted to open surgery because of intraoperative bleeding due to unexpected injury of ileocolic artery. The mean operative time was (152.8±42.1) min with a mean estimated blood loss of (70.4±43.5) ml. The mean time of first flatus was (49.3±22.9) h and mean liquid oral intake was (58.5±17.6) h. The postoperative complications appeared in 7 patients (9.2%), including one (1.3%) of pulmonary infection, one(1.3%) of urinary system infection, two (2.6%) of wound infection, two (2.6%) of inflammatory bowel obstruction and one (1.3%) of lymphatic fistula, and they were all cured with conservative treatments. The postoperative hospital stay was (7.8±5.4) d. The mean number of harvested lymph node was 34.2±10.9, among which 4.1±2.8 was positive. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy using caudal-to-cranial approach is safe and feasible.

Surgical skills for laparoscopic resection of the bursa omentalis and lymph node scavenging with radical gastrectomy.

The aim of the present study was to inquire into the feasibility, surgical skills required and short-term effect of a laparoscopic resection of the bursa omentalis and lymph node scavenging with radical gastrectomy. In this study, the clinical data of 18 patients who received a laparoscopic resection of the bursa omentalis with radical gastrectomy in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) during the period between January 2012 and January 2014. A retrospective analysis was performed and the surgical duration, bursa omentalis resection time, amount of bleeding during the surgery, post-operative complications associated with the surgery, length of hospital stay, number of lymph nodes scavenged and short-term follow-up results were assessed. The results indicated that all of these 18 patients successfully received a resection of the bursa omentalis and no one required conversion to open surgery. The mean surgical duration was 289.3±30.3 min, the bursa omentalis resection time was 46.1±18.6 min and the amount of bleeding was recorded as 35.5±6.5 ml in these patients. No patients suffered from post-operative complications, such as pancreatic fistulae, anastomotic fistulae, intestinal obstructions or succumbing to the surgery, and no patients succumbed within a 6-month follow-up period. In conclusion, for advanced gastric carcinoma, laparoscopic resection of the bursa omentalis and lymph node scavenging with radical gastrectomy is feasible. In addition to meeting the requirement that the operator should be skilled and experienced in open bursa omentalis resection, and have well-knit basic skills in using a laparoscope, attention must also be paid to the construction of the surgical team.