Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Surg ; 110(1): 159-166, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37737902

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lymph nodes along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (LRLN) is thought to be highly involved in esophageal cancer. Given the unique anatomical positioning of the nerve, performing lymphadenectomy in this region requires advanced techniques within limited working space. Meanwhile, high incidence of morbidity and mortality is associated with lymphadenectomy. Although several methods have been applied to reduce the technical requirement and the incidence of postoperative complication, the optimal method remains controversial. METHODS: This study was a single-center, prospective, randomized trial to investigate the utility of lymphadenectomy along the LRLN during the minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients by comparing the surgical outcome, postoperative complication, survival rate, and quality of life (QoL) between the retraction method (RM) and the suspension method (SM) in patients with esophageal cancer from June 2018 to November 2020. QoL was assessed according to questionnaire: EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS: Of 94 patients were enrolled and randomized allocated to RM and SM group equally. Characteristics did not differ between groups. The duration of lymph node dissection along LRLN was significant longer in SM group ( P <0.001). No difference was observed about postoperative complications. One of in-hospital death was occurred in each group ( P >0.999). Patients in neither of groups exhibiting difference about 3-year disease-free survival rate ( P =0.180) and overall survival rate ( P =0.430). No difference was observed in postoperative QoL between groups at different time points (all, P >0.05). CONCLUSION: Both methods of lymph node dissection along the LRLN during minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients are technically feasible and safe. The RM appears more favorable in terms of reducing surgical duration compared to the SM.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Humans , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Quality of Life , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve/surgery , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve/pathology , Esophagectomy/methods , Prospective Studies , Hospital Mortality , Retrospective Studies , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Postoperative Complications/surgery
2.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 1212, 2023 Dec 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38066484

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication following esophagectomy with high mortality. Perioperative decreased serum albumin level is considered a predictive of AL, however, its impact on AL incidence in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is not well defined. METHODS: The data of 318 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent MIE were collected retrospectively from January 2021 to December 2021. The perioperative level of albumin was detected and the baseline of altering levels for albumin was established. The incidence of postoperative complications and survival rate were analyzed between groups. RESULTS: After exclusion, 137 patients were enrolled and assigned to more decreased albumin (MA) and less decreased albumin (LA) groups. The levels of albumin descended significantly after MIE (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the clinicopathologic characteristics or surgical outcomes between groups. The incidence of postoperative AL was 10.2% in MA group and 1.4% in LA group (p = 0.033). Three patients died due to AL in MA group, while no mortality was observed in LA group (p = 0.120). The rate of other postoperative complications was similar between groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) in LA group was a little higher than that in MA group, but it was no significant difference (p = 0.853). Similarly, no difference was observed in overall survival (OS) between groups (p = 0.277). CONCLUSIONS: Severely deficient serum albumin after MIE was an indicator of AL in esophageal cancer patients treated with NCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese clinical trial registry: ChiCTR2200066694, registered December14th,2022. https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=185067&htm=4 .


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Serum Albumin , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/complications , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Serum Albumin/analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...