Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Phylogenet Evol ; 182: 107744, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36842731

ABSTRACT

Camellia (Theaceae) is a morphologically highly diverse genus of flowering plants and includes many famous species with high economic value, and the phylogeny of this genus is not fully resolved. We used 95 transcriptomes from 87 Camellia species and identified 1481 low-copy genes to conduct a detailed analysis of the phylogeny of this genus according to various data-screening criteria. The results show that, very different from the two existing classification systems of Camellia, 87 species are grouped into 8 main clades and two independent species, and that all 8 clades except Clade 8 were strongly supported by almost all the coalescent or concatenated trees using different gene subsets. However, the relationships among these clades were weakly supported and different from analyses using different gene subsets; furthermore, they do not agree with the phylogeny from chloroplast genomes of Camellia. Additional analyses support reticulate evolution (probably resulting from introgression or hybridization) among some major Camellia lineages, providing explanation for extensive gene tree conflicts. Furthermore, we inferred that together with the formation of East Asian subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests, Camellia underwent a radiative divergence of major clades at 23 âˆ¼ 19 Ma in the late Miocene then had a subsequent species burst at 10 âˆ¼ 5 Ma. Principal component and cluster analyses provides new insights into morphological changes underlying the evolution of Camellia and a reference to further clarify subgenus and sections of this genus. The comprehensive study here including a nuclear phylogeny and other analyses reveal the rapid evolutionary history of Camellia.


Subject(s)
Camellia , Theaceae , Phylogeny , Camellia/genetics , Hybridization, Genetic
2.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 25(4): 761-70, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26823037

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of fluoxetine on the short-term and long-term neural functional prognoses after ischemic stroke. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled single-blind clinical study in China, eligible patients afflicted with ischemic stroke were randomized into control and treatment groups. Patients in the treatment group received fluoxetine in addition to the basic therapies in the control group over a period of 90 days. The follow-up period was 180 days. We evaluated the effects of fluoxetine on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and Barthel Index (BI) score after ischemic stroke through single- and multiple-factor analysis. RESULTS: The mean NIHSS score on day 180 after treatment was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (P = .009). The mean BI scores on days 90 and 180 were significantly higher in the treatment group (P = .026) than in the control group (P = .011). The improvements in the NIHSS and BI scores on days 90 and 180 compared with baseline in the treatment group were all significantly greater than that in the control group (P = .033, P = .013, P = .013, P = .019, respectively). Treatment with fluoxetine was an independent factor affecting the NIHSS and BI scores on day 180 after treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with fluoxetine for 90 days after ischemic stroke can improve the long-term neural functional outcomes.


Subject(s)
Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Stroke/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Brain Ischemia/complications , China , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Stroke/etiology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...