Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX.

Appropriate use of FRAX reduces the number of people requiring DXA scans, while contemporaneously determining those most at risk. We compared the results of FRAX with and without inclusion of BMD. It suggests clinicians to carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in fracture risk estimation or interpretation in individual patients. PURPOSE: FRAX is a widely accepted tool to estimate the 10-year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fracture in adults. Prior calibration studies suggest this works similarly with or without the inclusion of bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of the study is to compare within-subject differences between FRAX estimations derived using DXA and Web software with and without the inclusion of BMD. METHOD: A convenience cohort was used for this cross-sectional study, consisting of 1254 men and women aged between 40 and 90 years who had a DXA scan and complete validated data available for analysis. FRAX 10-year estimations for hip and major osteoporotic fracture were calculated using DXA software (DXA-FRAX) and the Web tool (Web-FRAX), with and without BMD. Agreements between estimates within each individual subject were examined using Bland-Altman plots. We performed exploratory analyses of the characteristics of those with very discordant results. RESULTS: Overall median DXA-FRAX and Web-FRAX 10-year hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk estimations which include BMD are very similar: 2.9% vs. 2.8% and 11.0% vs. 11% respectively. However, both are significantly lower than those obtained without BMD: 4.9% and 14% respectively, P < 0.001. Within-subject differences between hip fracture estimates with and without BMD were < 3% in 57% of cases, between 3 and 6% in 19% of cases, and > 6% in 24% of cases, while for major osteoporotic fractures such differences are < 10% in 82% of cases, between 10 and 20% in 15% of cases, and > 20% in 3% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is excellent agreement between the Web-FRAX and DXA-FRAX tools when BMD is incorporated, sometimes there are very large differences for individuals between results obtained with and without BMD. Clinicians should carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in FRAX estimations when assessing individual patients.

Vertebral Fractures in Ireland: A Sub-analysis of the DXA HIP Project.

Osteoporosis is an important global health problem resulting in fragility fractures. The vertebrae are the commonest site of fracture resulting in extreme illness burden, and having the highest associated mortality. International studies show that vertebral fractures (VF) increase in prevalence with age, similarly in men and women, but differ across different regions of the world. Ireland has one of the highest rates of hip fracture in the world but data on vertebral fractures are limited. In this study we examined the prevalence of VF and associated major risk factors, using a sample of subjects who underwent vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) performed on 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machines. A total of 1296 subjects aged 40 years and older had a valid VFA report and DXA information available, including 254 men and 1042 women. Subjects had a mean age of 70 years, 805 (62%) had prior fractures, mean spine T-score was - 1.4 and mean total hip T-scores was - 1.2, while mean FRAX scores were 15.4% and 4.8% for major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture, respectively. Although 95 (7%) had a known VF prior to scanning, 283 (22%) patients had at least 1 VF on their scan: 161 had 1, 61 had 2, and 61 had 3 or more. The prevalence of VF increased with age from 11.5% in those aged 40-49 years to > 33% among those aged ≥ 80 years. Both men and women with VF had significantly lower BMD at each measured site, and significantly higher FRAX scores, P < 0.01. These data suggest VF are common in high risk populations, particularly older men and women with low BMD, previous fractures, and at high risk of fracture. Urgent attention is needed to examine effective ways to identify those at risk and to reduce the burden of VF.

Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures are Common in Hip Fracture Patients and are Under-recognized.

INTRODUCTION: The vertebrae are the most common site for osteoporotic fracture. While they can result in disability and increased mortality, only one-third present clinically. People with multiple fractures are at greater risk of future fractures. Most hip fracture patients are neither diagnosed nor treated for their underlying osteoporosis. Computed tomography (CT) studies are often performed on hospitalised patients, can be used to diagnose osteoporosis and are gaining popularity for opportunistic osteoporosis screening by measuring BMD and other bone strength indices. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of vertebral fractures on CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) in a cohort of hip fracture patients and whether this increased their diagnosis and treatment rates. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all hip fractures admitted to our institution between 2010 and 2017 to identify those who underwent CTPA scans. An independent, blinded consultant musculoskeletal radiologist reviewed the images for vertebral fractures and quantified severity using Genant criteria. Results were compared to the original radiology report, discharge diagnoses and treatment rates for osteoporosis. RESULTS: Eleven percent (225/2122) of patients had CTPA images available. Seventy percent (158) were female with a mean age of 78 years (SD: 11). The median length of stay for all patients was 16 days (1-301). Forty percent (90) of patients had at least one vertebral fracture present and 20% (46) had more than one fracture. Only one in 5 radiology reports noted the fractures. 24% of subjects had osteoporosis treatment recorded at hospital discharge and there was no difference between those with vertebral fractures to those without. CONCLUSION: Many hip fracture patients have undiagnosed spine fractures. A screening strategy which evaluates CT scans for fractures has potential to increase diagnosis and treatment rates of osteoporosis. However, more work is needed to increase awareness.

A systematic review of the Irish osteoporotic vertebral fracture literature.

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fractures (VF) are the most common osteoporotic fracture. They are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and are an important predictor of future fractures. The epidemiology of VF in Ireland is limited and a greater understanding of their scale and impact is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of publications on osteoporotic VF in Ireland. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane electronic databases to identify eligible publications from Ireland addressing osteoporotic VF. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria out of 1558 citations. All studies were published since 2000. Data was obtained on 182,771 patients with fractures. Nine studies included more than 100 subjects and three included more than 1000. Females accounted for 70% with an overall mean age of 65.2 years (30-94). There was significant heterogeneity in study design, methods and outcome measures including the following: use of administrative claims data on public hospital admissions, surgical and medical interventions, the impact of a fracture liaison service and the osteoporosis economic burden. The prevalence of VF was difficult to ascertain due to definitions used and differences in the study populations. Only two studies systematically reviewed spine imaging using blinded assessors and validated diagnostic criteria to assess the prevalence of fractures in patient cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Several studies show that VF are common when addressed systematically and the prevalence may be rising. However, there is a deficit of large studies systematically addressing the epidemiology and their importance in Ireland.