ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of stone formation amongst patients of the exstrophy-epispadias complex with augmentation cystoplasty. We hypothesize that bowel segment choice influences the rate of stone formation after bladder augmentation and the rate of complications from bladder stone surgery. METHODS: An IRB approved institutional database of 1512 exstrophy-epispadias patients was reviewed retrospectively. Patients that had a history of bladder augmentation and were seen at our institution between 2003 and 2023 were included. RESULTS: Out of 259 patients, bladder stones developed in 21.6% (56), of which the bowel segment used was colon in 147 patients and ileum in 100. Stones formed in 19% of colon augments compared to 29% ileal augments, however this was not statistically significant (p=0.07). The most common primary stone component was dahllite, followed by struvite for all augments. The median time to stone treatment after augmentation was 4.14 years (0.75-31). 74% of patients had a recurrence that required a second surgery. The median time from first to second surgery and second to third surgery was 1.4 years and 2.22 years, respectively. Bladder stone surgery complications occurred in 14% of patients, vesicocutaneous fistula being the most common, and complications did not differ by augment type. Median follow up after first stone intervention was 6.07 years (0-19.5). CONCLUSION: The treatment of bladder stones in the exstrophy-epispadias complex remains challenging. Interventions to prevent recurrence are crucial as the majority of patients will require two or more stone surgeries in their lifetime.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for stenosis and compare management strategies for stenosis etiology and to examine the efficacy of each approach. Patients with classic bladder exstrophy (CBE), a rare genitourinary malformation, may require construction of a continent urinary stoma (CUS) if incontinence persists. Stomal stenosis is a challenging complication as it is common, progressive and recurrent. METHODS: CBE patients who underwent CUS were retrospectively reviewed for risk factors for stenosis including stoma type, prior midline laparotomy number, and umbilicoplasty suture material. Stenosis etiology and management strategies were further reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 260 CBE patients underwent CUS creation. Stenosis developed in 65 patients (25.0%) at a median interval of 1.9 years. Etiology included scar contracture (n=41), keloid (n=17), and hypertrophic scar (n=7). Multifilament suture was the only variable associated with an increased risk of stenosis compared to monofilament suture (p=0.009). Almost all patients required surgical intervention. Most scar contractures underwent stomal incision with success in 100%. Hypertrophic scars and keloids responded best to excision with local tissue rearrangement (66.7%). At last follow-up, all patients achieved success. CONCLUSION: Stomal stenosis is common and challenging for the reconstructive surgeon. Strategies to prevent and effectively manage this are greatly desired. Use of multifilament suture for the umbilicoplasty increased stenosis perhaps from a greater inflammatory response and scarring, while monofilament suture may reduce its incidence. Stomal incision for treating scar contractures, and excision with local tissue rearrangement for hypertrophic scars and keloids may improve successful primary surgical intervention.
