No Drain, No Problem: Serum-Based Marker Prediction of Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative day (POD) 1 drain amylase concentration (DAC) is considered the most accurate predictor for the development of a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Recent studies have associated drain placement with negative postoperative outcomes. This study aims to evaluate multiple biochemical markers and their associations with CR-POPF development in order to identify a reliable, non-drain dependent alternative to DAC. METHODS: This is a review of 53 consecutive PD patients between 2021 and 2022. Albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), DAC, white blood cell count, and procalcitonin values were compared by CR-POPF status. The discriminatory abilities of CAR, CRP, and DAC for CR-POPF were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Six of 51 included patients developed a CR-POPF. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis produced an area under the curve of .977 for POD 1 DAC (cut-off 5131.0 IU/L, sensitivity 100%, specificity 95.5%), .858 for POD 1 CRP (cut-off 52.5 mg/L, sensitivity 100%, specificity 72.7%), and 1.000 for POD 3 CAR (cut-off 99.2, sensitivity and specificity 100%). POD 3 CAR produced a positive and negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: The CAR and CRP provide early and accurate identification of patients with post-PD CR-POPFs. These markers offer a method of safe CR-POPF detection, when the gold standard DAC is unavailable, ultimately allowing for early intervention and patient rescue.

Use of GLP-1 agonists in high risk patients prior to bariatric surgery: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Body mass index (BMI) > 50 kg/m2 is associated with relatively increased morbidity and mortality with bariatric surgery (BS). There is reluctance to consider these patients operative candidates without preoperative weight loss. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have demonstrated effective weight loss in the post-BS setting. This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of GLP-1 agonists in the pre-habilitation of patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of bariatric surgery patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 from a single bariatric center. Patients were compared by preoperative GLP-1 therapy status. All patients received medical, surgical, psychiatric, and nutritional evaluation and counseling. Preoperative BMI, change in weight from program intake until surgery, time to surgery, and perioperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: 31 patients were included in the analysis. 18 (58%) received a GLP-1 agonist preoperatively. GLP-1 agonist use was associated with a 5.5 ± 3.2-point reduction in BMI compared to 2.9 ± 2.4 amongst controls (p = 0.026). There was no difference in the mean length of time in the bariatric program prior to surgery between groups (p = 0.332). There were no reported complications related to GLP-1 use in the preoperative setting and no difference in perioperative complications between groups (p = 0.245). DISCUSSION: GLP-1 agonist use in patients with a BMI > 50 kg/m2 results in significantly more weight loss prior to bariatric surgery, without increased time to surgery or complication rate. Further study is required to evaluate the long-term impact of preoperative GLP-1 agonist use prior to bariatric surgery. This therapy may improve perioperative and long-term outcomes in the very high-risk BMI population.

Medical student preparation for the operating room.

BACKGROUND: This study examines student perceptions of preparedness for the operating room (OR), resources used, and time spent in preparation. METHODS: Third-year medical and second-year physician assistant students across two campuses at a single academic institution were surveyed to assess perceptions of preparedness, time spent in preparation, resources used, and perceived benefits of preparation. RESULTS: 95 responses (response rate 49%) were received. Students reported being most prepared to discuss operative indications and contraindications (73%), anatomy (86%), and complications (70%), but few felt prepared to discuss operative steps (31%). Students spent a mean of 28 min preparing per case, citing UpToDate and online videos as the most used resources (74%; 73%). On secondary analysis, only the use of an anatomic atlas was weakly correlated with improved preparedness to discuss relevant anatomy (p = 0.005); time spent, number of resources or other specific resources were not associated with increased preparedness. CONCLUSION: Students felt prepared for the OR, though there is room for improvement and a need for student-oriented preparatory materials. Understanding the deficits in preparation, preference for technology-based resources, and time constraints of current students can be used to inform optimisation for medical student education and resources to prepare for operating room cases.