Can on-line gait training improve clinical practice? Study protocol for feasibility randomised controlled trial of an on-line educational intervention to improve clinician's gait-related decision-making in ambulant children and young people with cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: Instrumented gait analysis (IGA) is an assessment and research tool with proven impacts on clinical decision-making for the management of ambulant children and young people with cerebral palsy (CYPwCP) but is underused and variably understood by relevant clinicians. Clinicians' difficulties in gaining expertise and confidence in using IGA are multifactorial and related to access for clinical decision-making, limited training opportunities and inability to translate this training into clinical practice. METHODS: The primary aim of this study is to test the feasibility of an educational intervention to advance clinicians' application of gait analysis in CYPwCP, to inform a definitive trial. The secondary aim is to measure the effect that appropriate IGA training has on physiotherapists' knowledge, skills, confidence and behaviours. This will be a two-arm feasibility randomised controlled trial with an experimental and control group. The 6-week on-line intervention uses a multicomponent approach grounded in behavioural change techniques. A repeated measures design will be adopted, whereby participants will complete outcome measures at baseline, immediately after the intervention and at 4 months. The primary outcome measures (trial feasibility-related outcomes) are recruitment and engagement. The secondary outcome measures (trial research-related outcomes) are knowledge, skills, confidence and practice change. Outcome measures will be collected via online questionnaires and during observed skill assessments. Analysis of data will use descriptive statistics, two-way mixed ANOVA model and qualitative content analysis. DISCUSSION: This study will determine feasibility of the definitive randomised control trial of educational intervention delivered to advance clinicians' application of gait analysis in CYPwCP. This study offers the shift in emphasis from regarding IGA as a tool to a focus on clinicians' requirements for access, training and a well-defined role to optimise utilisation of IGA. The impact of this should be better engagement with IGA and clinical practice change. This study will contribute to a body of educational research into clinical education of healthcare professionals and IGA training offering insight into high levels of evaluation evidence including clinical behaviour change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (osf.io/nweq6) in June 2023.

The impact of instrumented gait analysis on decision-making in the interprofessional management of cerebral palsy: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Management of gait-related problems in children and young people with Cerebral Palsy (CYPwCP) is complex and requires an interprofessional approach. Irrespective of underlying mechanisms, instrumented gait analysis (IGA) can provide quantification of gait to support clinical decision-making for CYPwCP when planning treatment interventions. AIM: This scoping review aimed to determine the impact of instrumented gait analysis (IGA) on treatment decision-making for CYPwCP, paying particular attention to interprofessional decision-making. METHOD: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched from inception to October 2019 for studies including CYPwCP age<25 years. The PRISMA ScR protocol was followed, and Quality was assessed with the Downs and Black (D&B) scale. Influences on decision-making were coded according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth framework (ICF-CY). RESULTS: Seventeen studies (1144 patients, 2.8-23 years) of varying quality (mean D&B = 17.2, range = 11-26) were included. Studies considered IGA influence at three decision-making stages 'Clinical Planning', 'Treatment Performed' and 'Follow up'. Child and Family, and Clinician and Service-centred factors had a high impact on engagement with IGA recommendations. INTERPRETATION: IGA guided recommendations can differ from initial clinical plans, and often lead to modification of the treatment ultimately performed. The effect on individual patients' outcomes when treatment recommendations based on instrumented gait analysis are followed is not yet clear and warrants further research. The differences in clinicians' engagement with IGA recommendations occur due to an array of Child and Family, and Clinician and Service-centred factors. Overall, IGA leads to less surgical recommendations, and has the potential to influence conservative gait-related management in CYPwCP.

Clinicians' Experiences of Instrumented Gait Analysis in Management of Patients with Cerebral Palsy: A Qualitative Study.

AIM: To identify the interaction of instrumented gait analysis (IGA) training, expertise, and application in gait-related management of cerebral palsy. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 20 purposively sampled clinicians with varying professional backgrounds, expertise, and training, analyzed using the framework method. RESULTS: Fifteen sub-themes were identified within three domains: training, equipment/outputs, and roles/reasons under the core theme IGA practice. Findings were illustrated using the Experience/Equipment/Roles/Training (Exp-ERT) Framework which identifies four user categories - based on influencing factors, beset by barriers, with experience reported as a common enabling factor. Clinicians who encountered barriers in one of the domains were categorized as either "frustrated" or "hesitant" users. Those who were no longer using IGA for clinical decisions were designated "confident non-users". Finally, the 'confident experts' reported the required level of training and access to interpret IGA outputs for clinical decision-making. Expertise gained at any level of clinical practice was shown to initiate advancement within domains. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians encounter a multitude of barriers to IGA practice that can result in failure to progress or impact on clinical decision-making. The Exp-ERT Framework emerges strongly from the data and could serve as an evaluation tool to diagnose barriers to confident expertise and support IGA-related professional development planning.