ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Workers hired through temporary staffing companies have a high rate of severe and fatal injuries despite the legally mandated, shared responsibility of the temporary staffing company and the host company to assure safe work. AIMS: The aim of this study was to elucidate the perspective of temporary staffing personnel on approaches to mitigating injury risk among the workers they hire. METHODS: Based on a conceptual model representing the interplay between work and health, we conducted a 'brainstorm' of temporary staffing personnel regarding perceived barriers to protecting temporary workers. A content/context analysis used standard qualitative methods, and the findings were triangulated with notes taken during the discussion. RESULTS: Temporary staffing employers describe loss of control of the working conditions once workers are placed at host/client companies. Further, they describe a contentious relationship between temporary staffing and host companies, where it is difficult to hold host companies to account. Other barriers to providing temporary workers with a safe work environment include the temp companies' lack of knowledge of site-specific hazards, the poor quality of onsite Occupational Safety and Health training, and ignoring Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. CONCLUSIONS: The perspective of temporary staffing companies should be considered to address the lack of cooperation and shifted responsibility described in this study. Policy and practice changes could include requiring contract language, implementing communication about safety, either sharing workers' compensation purchase or removing exclusive remedy protections from hosts, and prescribing safety training, such as an OSHA 10-h programme. Suggested interventions need further study.
ABSTRACT
Research assessing attitudes toward consent processes for high-throughput genomic-wide technologies and widespread sharing of data is limited. In order to develop a better understanding of stakeholder views toward these issues, this cross-sectional study assessed public and biorepository participant attitudes toward research participation and sharing of genetic research data. Forty-nine individuals participated in 6 focus groups; 28 in 3 public focus groups and 21 in 3 NUgene biorepository participant focus groups. In the public focus groups, 75% of participants were women, 75% had some college education or more, 46% were African-American and 29% were Hispanic. In the NUgene focus groups, 67% of participants were women, 95% had some college education or more, and the majority (76%) of participants was Caucasian. Five major themes were identified in the focus group data: (a) a wide spectrum of understanding of genetic research; (b) pros and cons of participation in genetic research; (c) influence of credibility and trust of the research institution; (d) concerns about sharing genetic research data and need for transparency in the Policy for Sharing of Data in National Institutes of Health-Supported or Conducted Genome-Wide Association Studies; (e) a need for more information and education about genetic research. In order to increase public understanding and address potential concerns about genetic research, future efforts should be aimed at involving the public in genetic research policy development and in identifying or developing appropriate educational strategies to meet the public's needs.
