Meniscal screw fixation provides sufficient stability to prevent tears from gapping.

BACKGROUND: Many meniscal fixation implants have low pull-out forces. It is still unknown if these forces are higher than the forces the implants must resist in vivo. It was hypothesized that meniscal repair with the meniscal screw as an example for a device of low pull-out force significantly reduces tear gapping. METHODS: Longitudinal tears were set in the posterior horn of the medial menisci of porcine knee joints. To observe the tears a translucent placeholder copying the original articular surface replaced the medial tibial plateau. The knees were moved in a loading and motion simulator under various external moments and axial loads and gapping of the tear was registered. The measurements were repeated after fixation of the tears with three ClearFix Screws, which show a low pull-out force of 20N only. FINDINGS: Maximum gapping (median 1.6mm, min/max 1.1/1.8mm) occurred at 200N axial joint load under the combination of a valgus and external rotation moment. Fixation with the ClearFix Screw significantly reduced tear gapping in all load cases. INTERPRETATION: Moderate joint loads only lead to small gaps of meniscal tears. Meniscal fixation with the ClearFix Screw prevents longitudinal meniscal tears from gapping. This could indicate from a biomechanical point of view that fixation implants of low pull-out strength are not in danger of failure in a normal rehabilitation regimen.

Gapping phenomenon of longitudinal meniscal tears.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the gapping behaviour of longitudinal meniscal tears. DESIGN: The gap size of longitudinal meniscal tears was measured in porcine knee joints under various joint loading conditions. BACKGROUND: Many meniscal fixation implants have low pull out forces. However, it is unknown if these forces are less than the forces the implants must resist in vivo. It is also unknown if gapping occurs in longitudinally torn menisci and what joint loads induce gapping. METHODS: Longitudinal tears were set in the medial menisci of eight porcine knee joints. To observe the tears an opaque placeholder of the same shape as the original articular surface replaced the medial tibial plateau. The knees were exposed to flexion-extension cycles in a loading and motion simulator under 30 and 200 N axial joint load without external moments, under tibial rotation moments, varus or valgus moments, and combined moments. For each load condition the maximum gap of the tear was registered. RESULTS: Maximum gapping (1.59 mm, SD 0.47) occurred in the 3 cm tear at 200 N axial joint load under the combination of a valgus and external rotation moment. An internal tibial rotation moment produced the smallest gaps in tears of any length and at any axial joint load. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum gap size found in this study and the previously published pull out stiffnesses of meniscal fixation implants reveal maximum forces on the implant in vivo of only 8.4 N. This explains why meniscal tears fixed with implants of low pull out strength can heal. RELEVANCE: The current study shows that moderate joint loads only lead to small gaps of meniscal tears. Clinically, this means that fixation implants of low pull out strength are not in danger of failure in a normal rehabilitation regimen.