A multicenter study of DDAVP versus platelet transfusions for antiplatelet agent reversal in patients with traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet agents have been shown to worsen outcomes following traumatic injury. Research on desmopressin (DDAVP) and platelet transfusion for antiplatelet reversal is limited. We aimed to evaluate the effect of these agents on patients taking pre-injury antiplatelet medications who experienced traumatic brain injury (TBI) after blunt trauma. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients from 2014 to 2021 on aspirin and/or a P2Y12 inhibitor. Patients were stratified into groups based on if they received DDAVP, platelets, both agents, or neither. RESULTS: Of 5525 included patients, 4696 (85.4%) were not reversed, 461 (8.4%) received platelets, 173 (3.1%) received DDAVP, and 172 (3.1%) received both reversals. There was no statistically significant difference in length of stay between, but patients who received platelets or both reversals were more likely to have hospital complications (p < 0.05), longer hospital length of stay (p < 0.001), and longer ICU length of stay (p < 0.001) compared to those who did not receive reversal. A subgroup analysis of patients with a head AIS of 4 or 5 confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received platelets or both reversals had a longer length of hospital stay and length of ICU stay. It is difficult to recommend one treatment over another based on our results alone. Further studies are needed to help clarify the risks and benefits of reversal agents in this patient population.

Measuring the impact of becoming a health-promoting campus: Creating a comprehensive evaluation model.

OBJECTIVE: As more institutions adopt the Okanagan Charter (2015) to become health-promoting campuses, the question of how to effectively evaluate the impact of this work remains key. This article describes the development of an evaluation model designed to measure the collective impact of embedding holistic health into all aspects of campus culture. METHODS: Drawing from social cognitive, social ecological, and organizational change frameworks, the evaluation model provides a tiered, mixed-methods approach for assessing the impact of cross-sector health-promoting programs, policies, and campus culture change on student well-being. RESULTS: We review the evaluation model with corresponding research questions, case examples, and key indicators that can be adopted at other institutions to provide a flexible, scalable, and sustainable approach to monitoring campus health and well-being over time. CONCLUSIONS: This work responds to increasing calls to develop concrete frameworks to translate the principles of health-promoting campus work into equitable and sustainable action.

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa was approved in 2018 for reversal of direct oral anticoagulants but due to issues of cost and access, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) continues to be used for this indication. The objective of this study is to evaluate outcomes of reversal with these agents in patients with isolated traumatic brain injuries (TBI). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 35 trauma centres from 2014 to 2021. Patients were included with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)>2 for head and having received andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC within 24 hours of admission. Patients were excluded if P2Y12 inhibitor use or AIS>2 outside of head. Primary outcome includes rate of mortality/hospice at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes include a composite of serious hospital complications. A subgroup analysis of severe TBI patients (AIS head 4 or 5) was completed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to account for differences in comorbidities and TBI severity. RESULTS: 4F-PCC was given to 265 patients with another 59 receiving andexanet alfa. Patients in the andexanet alfa group were more likely to have an AIS head score of 5 (47.5% vs 26.1%; p<0.005). After adjusting for severity of TBI and comorbidities with regard to tomortality/hospice, there were 15 (25.4%) patients in the andexanet alfa group and 49 (18.5%) in the 4F-PCC group (OR 1.34; 95% CI 0.67 to 2.71). This remained consistent when looking at severe patients with TBI with 12 (28.6%) andexanet alfa patients and 37 (28.7%) 4F-PCC patients (OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.40 to 2.16)). Severe hospital complications were also similar between groups with 5 (8.5%) andexanet alfa patients as compared with 21 (7.9%) 4F-PCC patients (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.36 to 2.88). CONCLUSION: There was no firm conclusion on the treatment effect in mortality/hospice or serious complications among isolated TBI patients reversed with 4F-PCC as compared with andexanet alfa.

Is reversal of anticoagulants necessary in neurologically intact traumatic intracranial hemorrhage?

INTRODUCTION: Falls are the leading cause of injury in older individuals, with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) being a common complication. Anticoagulants, such as vitamin K antagonist and direct oral anticoagulants, are increasingly utilized, and clinicians may question the necessity of reversal in patients with minor ICH, especially in the setting of increased risk of adverse events. This study aimed to identify a population of patients with minor traumatic ICH at low risk for poor-neurologic status where anticoagulant reversal may not improve outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized data accessed from 35 trauma centers from 2018 to 2021. Patients included had a preinjury anticoagulant regimen, ICH due to blunt trauma, Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head score from 2 to 4, and an AIS of ≤1 for non-head regions within 24 h of hospital arrival. Patients were excluded if they required an emergent neurosurgical procedure or were on a preinjury purinergic-P2 receptor-12 protein (P2Y12) inhibitor. The primary outcome was the rate of in-hospital mortality or hospice. RESULTS: There were 654 patients on preinjury anticoagulation who were included with a minor traumatic ICH without neurologic deficits. Overall, 263 patients were reversed and 391 were not reversed. Twelve (4.6%) patients with in-hospital mortality or hospice were reversed compared with 19 (4.91%) patients who were not reversed (p = 0.861). A composite of hospital complications occurred in 21 (8%) reversed patients and 34 (8.7%) not reversed patients (p = 0.748). The average intensive care unit length of stay was 1.4 ± 3.4 days in the reversed group and 1.1 ± 1.8 days in the not reversed group (p = 0.069). CONCLUSION: This study found no difference in hospital outcomes between patients with minor traumatic ICH on oral anticoagulants who were neurologically intact that were reversed versus those who were not reversed. Further studies should continue to define the subset of traumatic ICH patients who may not require reversal of anticoagulation.

Clinical outcomes for patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulants in thoracoabdominal trauma.

Introduction: Trauma outcomes can be greatly affected by antiplatelet and anticoagulant (AP/AC) use. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes in trauma patients on AP/AC undergoing emergent surgery for thoracoabdominal trauma at 35 level 1 and 2 trauma centers from 2014 to 2021. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 2460 adult patients with a chest, abdomen, or pelvis abbreviated injury score (AIS) of 2 or more who underwent surgery within 24 h of admission. These patients were segregated into four main cohorts based on antiplatelet/anticoagulation use: those not on AP/AC, those taking direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), those taking clopidogrel, and those taking warfarin. Patients were excluded if they had surgery >24 h after presentation, were dead on arrival, or had any other body system AIS score of 3 or higher. Results: The mean injury severity score (ISS) in all four groups ranged from 16.3 to 18.6 (p = 0.834) with a mean time to operating room from 208 to 478 min (p < 0.001). Laparotomy was performed in 60 to 71 % (p > 0.01) of patients, regardless of AP/AC status, and thoracic procedures were performed in 3.1 to 9.3 % (p = 0.42) of patients. In-hospital mortality and hospice rates were highest in the clopidogrel group at 21.9 %, followed by warfarin at 13 %, DOACs at 15 %, and no AP/AC at 7.63 % (p = 0.008). Serious complications occurred in 61 % of patients on warfarin, 50 % of those on DOACs, and 44 % of those on clopidogrel. All of these groups demonstrated significantly higher complication rates than patients in the no AP/AC control group at 25 % (p < 0.001). Total transfusion of packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma did not differ significantly between the groups; however, 24-h platelet transfusion did. Patients on clopidogrel received 14 packs of platelets, while those on warfarin and DOACs received 8 and 13 packs respectively (p = 0.011). Patients on warfarin had the longest hospital length of stay (LOS) at 13 days and ICU LOS at 9 days, compared to those on DOACs (8 and 4), those on clopidogrel (7 and 3), and those not taking AC/AP (7 and 4) (hospital LOS p = 0.03, ICU LOS p = 0.019). Those on AC/AP were also noted to be significantly older than those on neither, with those taking these medications averaging out to be approximately 69 years old and those not on these medications averaging 37 years old (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There was significantly higher mortality in patients on clopidogrel and increased length of stay and risk of serious complications in patients taking DOACs and warfarin. In patients on AP/AC there was also a significantly longer time to surgery than in those not taking either. Given these associations trauma surgeons should consider intervening sooner on patients taking AP/AC on admission, as the delay to intervention may contribute to the risks for trauma patients and result in worse outcomes as well as higher rates of mortality.

Trajectory of PaO2/FiO2 Ratio in Shock After Angiotensin II.

INTRODUCTION: High-dose catecholamines can impair hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and increase shunt fraction. We aimed to determine if Angiotensin II (Ang-2) is associated with improved PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 in patients in shock. METHODS: Adult patients at four tertiary care centers and one community hospital in the United States who received Ang-2 from July 2018-September 2020 were included in this retrospective, observational cohort study. PaO2, SpO2, and FiO2 were measured at 13 timepoints during the 48-h before and after Ang-2 initiation. Piecewise linear mixed models of PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 were created to evaluate hourly changes in oxygenation after Ang-2 initiation. The difference in the proportion of patients with PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg at the time of Ang-2 initiation and 48 h after was also examined. RESULTS: The study included 254 patients. In the 48 h prior to Ang-2 initiation, oxygenation was significantly declining (hourly PaO2/FiO2 change -4.7 mm Hg/hr, 95% CI - 6.0 to -3.5, p < .001; hourly SpO2/FiO2 change -3.1/hr, 95% CI-3.7 to -2.4, p < .001). Ang-2 treatment was associated with significant improvements in PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 in the 48-h after initiation (hourly PaO2/FiO2 change +1.5 mm Hg/hr, 95% CI 0.5-2.5, p = .003; hourly SpO2/FiO2 change +0.9/hr, 95% CI 0.5-1.2, p < .001). The difference in the hourly change in oxygenation before and after Ang-2 initiation was also significant (pinteraction < 0.001 for both PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2). This improvement was associated with significantly fewer patients having a PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg at 48 h compared to baseline (mean difference -14.9%, 95% CI -25.3% to -4.6%, p = .011). Subgroup analysis found that patients with either a baseline PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg or a norepinephrine-equivalent dose requirement >0.2 µg/kg/min had the greatest associations with oxygenation improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Ang-2 is associated with improved PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2. The mechanisms for this improvement are not entirely clear but may be due to catecholamine-sparing effect or may also be related to improved ventilation-perfusion matching, intrapulmonary shunt, or oxygen delivery.

Effect of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Agents on Outcomes Following Emergent Surgery for Traumatic Brain Injuries.

PURPOSE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the largest cause of death from injury in the United States. This study utilized the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program (MTQIP) database to determine the effect that antiplatelets and anticoagulants (AP/AC) have on outcomes following emergent surgery for TBI patients. BASIC PROCEDURES: Patients were included with age ≥18 years, maximum head/neck abbreviated injury score (AIS) ≥2, and underwent a neurosurgical procedure within 24 hours. Patients were excluded if they had an AIS ≥3 in other body region or no signs of life at initial evaluation. MAIN FINDINGS: Within the 1,932 patients analyzed, 139 (8.74%) were in the warfarin with or without (+/-) aspirin cohort, 101 (6.35%) in the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) +/- aspirin cohort, 169 (10.62%) in the clopidogrel +/- aspirin cohort, and 1,182 (74.29%) in the no AP/AC cohort (control group). After controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, no significant difference in mortality rates was observed in the treatment groups (P > 0.05). However, our subgroup analysis did reveal a significantly higher mortality rate within the warfarin and aspirin subgroup when compared to the control group (odds ratio [OR], 2.368; confidence interval [CI], 1.306-4.294, P = 0.005). With regards to hospital complications, there was a significant increase in this outcome within the DOAC +/- aspirin (OR, 1.825; CI, 1.143-2.915, P = 0.012) and clopidogrel +/- aspirin (OR, 1.82; CI, 1.244-2.663, P=0.002) groups. CONCLUSION: Patients on AP/AC who experience a TBI requiring an emergent operation do not have an increased risk of mortality compared to patients not on AP/AC.

Effects of Early Chemoprophylaxis in Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing to initiate venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) is still unknown. We designed a study to determine the effect that timing of initiation of VTE prophylaxis has on VTE rates in TBI patients. METHODS: Patient records were obtained from 32 level 1 and 2 trauma centers in the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2008 to 2018. Overall, 5589 patients with a TBI were included and split into cohorts based on VTE prophylaxis initiation time. Outcomes included rate of VTE, mortality, and serious in-hospital complications. RESULTS: There were nine patients (1.3%) in the <24 hour group with a VTE as compared to 36 (2.6%) in the 24-48 hour group, 51 (4.1%) in the 48-72 hour group, and 181 (8.1%) in the >72 hour group (P < .001). The adjusted odds of VTE were significantly greater in patients initiated within 48-72 hours (AOR 2.861, 95% CI 1.271-6.439) and >72 hours (AOR 3.963, 95% CI 1.824-8.612) compared to <24 hours. Patients that received VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours had similar rates of serious in-hospital complication as patients initiated within 24-48 hours (AOR .956, 95% CI .637-1.434) and 48-72 hour (AOR 1.132, 95% CI .757-1.692) but less than the >72 hour group (AOR 1.662, 95% CI 1.154-2.393) groups. DISCUSSION: Patients initiated on VTE prophylaxis within 48 hours of presentation had lower incidence of VTE without a significant increase in serious complications.

The Effect of Antiplatelet Agents on Thromboelastography.

BACKGROUND: Thomboelastography (TEG) is a point of care viscoelastic test that provides an assessment of clot formation and kinetics. Antiplatelet agents are commonly used but there is limited literature evaluating their possible effects on overall clot kinetics. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between antiplatelet agents and clot kinetics as defined by TEG. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent TEG from February 2018 to July 2020. Patients who received anticoagulants or blood transfusions within 72 hours, had an incomplete TEG, were diagnosed with COVID-19, or had liver failure were excluded. Patients were stratified based on antiplatelet status. RESULTS: Of 1060 patients, 119 were included (50 controls, 69 antiplatelet agents-37 aspirin monotherapy, 26 dual antiplatelet therapy). Between the control and antiplatelet therapy groups, there was no significant difference in clot time, maximal clot strength, or fibrinogen level. When compared to control patients, patients on dual antiplatelets had significantly higher fibrinogen levels (408.1 mg/dL vs 481.5 mg/dL, P = .013) but no significant differences in clot time or maximal clot strength. In our subgroup analysis, patients on dual antiplatelets had increased maximal clot strength (58.8° vs 63°, P = .005) and fibrinogen levels (384.1 mg/dL vs 481.5 mg/dL, P = .005) compared to those on aspirin alone. DISCUSSION: Compared to control patients and those on aspirin alone, patients on dual antiplatelets have increased maximal clot strength and increased fibrinogen levels. These results can help physicians better target product resuscitation in patients who are on antiplatelet agents.

The Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Outcomes After Urgent or Emergent Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety of performing urgent or emergent cardiac surgery within 5 days of a patient taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective registry study. SETTING: Thirty-three hospitals in a quality collaborative from 2017 to 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were included if they underwent urgent or emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients were excluded if they received any anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent besides DOACs, heparin, or aspirin. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified based upon the receipt of a DOAC within 5 days of their surgery. Patient cohorts included DOAC within 2 days, DOAC within 3-to-5 days, and no anticoagulation. Data were unavailable on the specific DOAC agent taken prior to admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 7,201 patients included, with 94 on DOACs. Intraoperative blood transfusion was required in 23.9% of patients on no anticoagulant, 26.2% on a DOAC within 3-to-5 days of surgery (odds ratio [OR] 0.98; 95% CI 0.46-2.11), and 30.3% on a DOAC within 2 days (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.37-2.67). Five or more intraoperative blood products were required in 4.4% on no anticoagulant, 1.7% on DOAC within 3-to-5 days (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.04-2.71), and 6.1% on DOAC within 2 days (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.06-4.05). No difference in mortality was observed among the 3 groups (2.9% v 3.3% v 3.0%; p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: For urgent or emergent CABGs, no significant differences in minor bleeding, major bleeding, or mortality were observed in patients taking a DOAC within 5 days of surgery. This study was hypothesis-generating for performing urgent or emergent surgery sooner than 5 days after holding DOACs.

Integrated Surveillance System for Controlling COVID-19 on a University Campus, 2020‒2021.

To minimize the impacts of COVID-19 and to keep campus open, Cornell University's Ithaca, NY, campus implemented a comprehensive process to monitor COVID-19 spread, support prevention practices, and assess early warning indicators linked to knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes of campus community members. The integrated surveillance approach informed leadership and allowed for prompt adjustments to university policies and practices through evidence-based decisions. This approach enhanced healthy behaviors and promoted the well-being and safety of all community members. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(7):980-984. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306838).

The Use of Inhaled Epoprostenol for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Secondary Due To COVID-19: a Case Series.

Introduction: Inhaled epoprostenol (iEpo) is a pulmonary vasodilator used to treat refractory respiratory failure, including that caused by Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Aim of Study: To describe the experience at three teaching hospitals using iEpo for severe respiratory failure due to COVID-19 and evaluate its efficacy in improving oxygenation. Methods: Fifteen patients were included who received iEpo, had confirmed COVID-19 and had an arterial blood gas measurement in the 12 hours before and 24 hours after iEpo initiation. Results: Eleven patients received prone ventilation before iEpo (73.3%), and six (40%) were paralyzed. The partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F ratio) improved from 95.7 mmHg to 118.9 mmHg (p=0.279) following iEpo initiation. In the nine patients with severe ARDS, the mean P/F ratio improved from 66.1 mmHg to 95.7 mmHg (p=0.317). Ultimately, four patients (26.7%) were extubated after an average of 9.9 days post-initiation. Conclusions: The findings demonstrated a trend towards improvement in oxygenation in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Although limited by the small sample size, the results of this case series portend further investigation into the role of iEpo for severe respiratory failure associated with COVID-19.

A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study of Angiotensin II in Shock.

INTRODUCTION: Angiotensin II (Ang-2) is a non-catecholamine vasopressor that targets the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system by agonism of the angiotensin type 1 receptor. Its utility as a vasopressor and a catecholamine-sparing agent was demonstrated in the pivotal ATHOS-3 trial, and numerous post-hoc analyses have shown reduced mortality in certain subsets of the population. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients at 5 centers who received Ang-2 from 2017-2020 were included in this multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study. Patient demographics, hemodynamics, and adverse events were collected. The primary outcomes of the study were the mean difference in MAP and norepinephrine (NEpi)-equivalent dose at hours 0 and 3 following initiation of Ang-2 therapy. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in this study. The primary outcomes of an increase in MAP (mean difference 9.3 mmHg, 95% CI 6.4-12.1, p < 0.001) and a reduction in NEpi equivalent dose (mean difference 0.16 µg/kg/min, 95% CI 0.10-0.22, p < 0.001) between hours 0 and 3 were statistically significant. The median time to reach a MAP ≥65 was 16 minutes (IQR 5-60 min). After stratifying patients by the NED dose and number of vasopressors administered prior to the initiation of Ang-2, those with a NED dose < 0.2 µg/kg/min, NED dose < 0.3 µg/kg/min, or those on ≤ 3 vasopressors had a significantly greater reduction in NED by hour 3 than those patients above these thresholds. CONCLUSION: Ang-2 is an effective vasopressor and reduces catecholamine dose significantly. Its effect is rapid, with target MAP obtained within 30 minutes in most patients. Given the critical importance of adequate blood pressure to organ perfusion, Ang-2 should be considered when target MAP cannot be achieved with conventional vasopressors. Ang-2 should be utilized early in the course of shock, before the NED dose exceeds 0.2-0.3 µg/kg/min and before the initiation of the fourth-line vasopressor.

Blood Pressure Control in Acute Stroke: Labetalol or Nicardipine?

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of continuous infusion (CIV)-labetalol compared to -nicardipine in controlling blood pressure (BP) in the acute stroke setting. MATERIALS: Patients were eligible if they had a diagnosis of an acute stroke and were administered either CIV-labetalol or CIV-nicardipine. Study outcomes were assessed within the first 24 h of the antihypertensive infusion. RESULTS: A total of 3,093 patients were included with 3,008 patients in the CIV-nicardipine group and 85 in the CIV-labetalol group. No significant difference was observed in percent time at goal BP between the nicardipine (82%) and labetalol (85%) groups (p = 0.351). There was also no difference in BP variability between nicardipine (37%) and labetalol (39%) groups (p = 0.433). Labetalol was found to have a shorter time to goal BP as compared to nicardipine (24 min vs. 40 min; p = 0.021). While CIV-nicardipine did have a higher incidence of tachycardia compared to labetalol (17% vs. 4%; p <0.001), the incidence of hypotension (13% vs. 15%; p = 0.620) and bradycardia (24% vs. 22%; p = 0.797) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that CIV-labetalol and CIV-nicardipine are comparable in safety and efficacy in controlling BP for patients with acute stroke.

Association of timing of initiation of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with outcomes in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients are at a high risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) following traumatic injury. We examined the relationship between timing of initiation of pharmacologic prophylaxis with VTE complications. METHODS: Trauma quality collaborative data from 34 American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma-verified levels I and II trauma centers were analyzed. Patients were excluded if they were on anticoagulant therapy at the time of injury, had hospitalization <48 hours, or received no or nonstandard pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis (heparin drip). Patient comparison groups were based on timing of initiation of VTE prophylaxis relative to hospital presentation (0 to <24 hours, 24 to <48 hours, ≥48 hours). Risk-adjusted rates of VTE events were calculated accounting for patient factors including type of pharmacologic agent in addition to standard trauma patient confounders. A sensitivity analysis was performed excluding patients who received blood in the first 4 hours and/or patients with a significant traumatic brain injury. RESULTS: Within the 79,386 patients analyzed, there were 1,495 (1.9%) who experienced a VTE complication and 1,437 (1.8%) who died. After adjusting for type of prophylaxis and patient factors, the risk of a VTE event was significantly increased in the 24- to <48-hour (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.47; p = 0.002) and ≥48-hour (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.04-2.70; p < 0.001) cohorts relative to patients initiated at 0 to <24 hours. These VTE event findings remained significant after exclusion of perceived higher-risk patients in a sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: Early initiation of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in stable trauma patients is associated with lower rates of VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, level III.

Early Chemoprophylaxis in Severely Injured Trauma Patients Reduces Risk of Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a serious complication for trauma patients. While early VTE prophylaxis has gained traction, the timing of prophylaxis remains uncertain. We hypothesized that VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours of admission would have lower VTE rates and similar rates of adverse events in seriously injured patients. METHODS: Trauma patients were included from 32 American College of Surgeons verified Level 1 and 2 trauma centers over a 10-year period. Patients with injury severity score (ISS) <15, death or discharge within 48 hours of arrival, or who received no prophylaxis were excluded. RESULTS: 14 096 patients received VTE prophylaxis with an ISS of ≥15. Patients given prophylaxis at <24 hours had fewer VTE events and trended toward fewer serious in-hospital complications. Mortality and return to the operating room were similar across groups. Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay in the <24 hours prophylaxis group was significantly shorter when VTE prophylaxis was initiated earlier. CONCLUSIONS: In severely injured trauma patients with ISS >15, early VTE prophylaxis within 24 hours significantly reduced the risk of VTE as compared with delayed prophylaxis. Early chemoprophylaxis was found to be efficacious in reducing the incidence of VTE; however, the safety of this practice should be evaluated by future prospective studies.

Effect of Preinjury Oral Anticoagulants on Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury from Falls in Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin has been the oral anticoagulant of choice for the treatment of thromboembolic disease. However, upward of 50% of all new anticoagulant prescriptions are now for direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). Despite this, outcome data evaluating preinjury anticoagulants remain scarce following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Our study objective is to determine the effects of preinjury anticoagulation on outcomes in older adults with TBI. METHODS: Patient data were obtained from 29 level 1 and 2 trauma centers from 2012 to June 30, 2018. Overall, 8312 patients who were aged 65 years or older, suffering a ground level fall, and with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head score of ≥ 3 were identified. Patients were excluded if they presented with no signs of life or a traumatic mechanism besides ground level fall. Statistical comparisons were made using multivariable analyses with anticoagulant/antiplatelet use as the independent variable. RESULTS: Of the total patients with TBI, 3293 were on antiplatelet agents (AP), 669 on warfarin, 414 on warfarin + AP, 188 on DOACs, 116 on DOAC + AP, and 3632 on no anticoagulant. There were 185 (27.7%) patients on warfarin and 43 (22.9%) on a DOAC with a combined outcome of mortality or hospice as compared to 575 (15.8%) in the no anticoagulant group (p<0.001). After adjusting for patient factors, there was an increased risk of mortality or hospice in the warfarin (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.27-2.01) and DOAC group (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.07-2.59) as compared to no anticoagulant. Warfarin + AP was associated with an increased risk of mortality or hospice (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.18-2.21) that was not seen with DOAC + AP (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.46-1.87) as compared to no anticoagulant. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with TBI, preinjury treatment with warfarin or DOACs resulted in an increased risk of mortality or hospice whereas preinjury AP therapy did not increase risk. Future studies are needed with larger sample sizes to directly compare TBI outcomes associated with preinjury warfarin versus DOAC use.

Perspectives from the frontline: A pharmacy department's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created unprecedented strains on healthcare systems around the world. Challenges surrounding an overwhelming influx of patients with COVID-19 and changes in care dynamics prompt the need for care models and processes that optimize care in this medically complex patient population. The purpose of this report is to describe our institution's strategy to deploy pharmacy resources and standardize pharmacy processes to optimize the management of patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective, descriptive report characterizes documented pharmacy interventions in the acute care of patients admitted for COVID-19 during the period April 1 to April 15, 2020. Patient monitoring, interprofessional communication, and intervention documentation by pharmacy staff was facilitated through the development of a COVID-19-specific care bundle integrated into the electronic medical record. RESULTS: A total of 1,572 pharmacist interventions were documented in 197 patients who received a total of 15,818 medication days of therapy during the study period. The average number of interventions per patient was 8. The most common interventions were regimen simplification (15.9%), timing and dosing adjustments (15.4%), and antimicrobial therapy and COVID-19 treatment adjustments (15.2%). Patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit care at any point during their hospital stay accounted for 66.7% of all interventions documented. CONCLUSION: A pharmacy department's response to the COVID-19 pandemic was optimized through standardized processes. Pharmacists intervened to address a wide scope of medication-related issues, likely contributing to improved management of COVID-19 patients. Results of our analysis demonstrate the vital role pharmacists play as members of multidisciplinary teams during times of crisis.

Association of mortality among trauma patients taking preinjury direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists.

BACKGROUND: The population of patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy for medical conditions is increasing. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of preinjury anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy on outcomes after trauma. METHODS: This cohort study analyzed data from the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2012 to 2017 and included trauma patients age ≥16 years with an Injury Severity Score ≥5 treated at 29 hospitals. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 115,042 trauma patients, 44.2% were women and 78.2% were white with a mean age (standard deviation) of 59.1 (23.2) years. A total of 23,196 patients were on antiplatelet therapy, 3,855 on warfarin, 1,893 on warfarin + antiplatelet agent, 1,306 on a direct oral anticoagulant, and 717 patients on direct oral anticoagulant + antiplatelet therapy. We observed an increased risk of mortality in patients on preinjury antiplatelet (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.33), warfarin (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.05-1.65), or warfarin + antiplatelet therapy (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.18-2.14). Patients on a direct oral anticoagulant only were not at statistically increased risk for mortality. CONCLUSION: Preinjury antiplatelet and/or warfarin use was associated with an increased risk of mortality after traumatic injury. Preinjury direct oral anticoagulant use was not associated with a statistically increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Safety of high-dose intravenous labetalol in hypertensive crisis.

PURPOSE: The study assesses the safety of high-dose intravenous (i.v.) labetalol in adults. METHODS: This is a retrospective administrative record review of 28 hospitals in one health care system, from October 2010 through October 2015. Patients were included if they received 300 mg of i.v. labetalol within a 24-hour period. Vital signs, adverse events and cumulative medication doses were obtained for up to 24 hours while on labetalol. Adverse events were defined as any systolic blood pressure measurement less than 90 mm Hg or heart rate less than 60 beats per minute. RESULTS: We analyzed the records of 188 patients who received i.v. labetalol at higher than the maximum recommended dose of 300 mg. The mean dose of labetalol was 996 mg (range 300 to 4465 mg). The cumulative labetalol dose was not associated with adverse safety outcomes (p = 0.428), although eighty-one patients (44.3%) experienced adverse events. Sixty-six patients (36.5%) developed bradycardia and 34 patients (18.6%) developed hypotension. Only five patients (2.7%) required a rescue agent for refractory adverse events. CONCLUSION: A retrospective review of high-dose i.v. labetalol hydrochloride with doses greater than 300 mg in 24 hours observed a high rate of bradycardia and hypotension, but the study found that these events rarely caused clinically significant hemodynamic compromise and was not statistically associated with adverse events.