Women's acceptability of screening for HIV in pregnancy.

AIMS: To elicit acceptability of HIV screening during pregnancy in women of reproductive age in Christchurch. METHODS: In-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted with women of reproductive age recruited from seven different service sites in Christchurch. RESULTS: Women wanted to know about treatment that significantly reduces the risk of mother-to-child transmission. They wanted to know about other antenatal screening and were prepared to provide general consent, rather than specific consent for HIV testing. All study participants favoured routine offer of HIV testing during pregnancy for all women and most would agree to be tested, if the test was offered and recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate the need to develop and test a user-friendly approach for offering routine HIV testing during standard antenatal care in New Zealand.

Maternity care providers' attitudes and practices concerning HIV testing during pregnancy; results of a survey of the Canterbury and upper South Island region.

AIMS: To assess current attitudes and practice toward antenatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) risk assessment, HIV testing and barriers towards implementation of these among midwives, general practitioners (GPs) and obstetricians in the upper South Island METHODS: A survey was conducted among maternity care providers by anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Most questions were dichotomous, forced choice or Likert scale format but there were four open- ended questions asking for a written response. RESULTS: The response rate was 57% overall. The main finding was that 275 (66%) of respondents assessed risk of HIV in less than 10% of patients, and 328 (midwives 93, 85%; GP's 226,77%; obstetricians 9,64%) respondents had performed less than three HIV tests in the past twelve months. Most respondents strongly agreed that detection of HIV during pregnancy is beneficial to mother 318 (83%) and to baby 367 (96%) and to mother prior to pregnancy 353 (92%). 202 (52%) supported and 44 (11%) were opposed to an antenatal screening programme in New Zealand. Most knew how to assess risk for HIV saw themselves as having an important role in antenatal HIV testing, and were comfortable performing risk assessment. Multiple reasons for current practices were offered, including perceived reluctance by women to be tested, lack of time, skills, knowledge and support services, and low rates of HIV in the community. CONCLUSIONS: The current policy of routine HIV risk assessment is not working among respondents. A systematic reassessment and implementation of a workable strategy needs to be undertaken in New Zealand.

Toward totally smokefree schools and beyond: the Crown Public Health Smokefree Schools Grant Program.

A three-year small grants scheme in Canterbury and the West Coast, New Zealand aims to influence the health promoting climate of schools by adopting totally smokefree policies. The Smokefree Environments Act of 1990 established the legal imperative for school policies. The principles of the Treaty of Waitangi and the strategies of the Ottawa Charter provide the programmatic and evaluation framework. Evaluation indicators include the organizational and policy context, status of school smoking policies, reasons for participation, stakeholder involvement, the value of additional funding, and the extent of media coverage. Partnerships among local smokefree partners, schools and whanau/communities, and between the health and education sectors are a priority. Interim findings indicate the Crown Public Health Smokefree Schools Grant program has positively influenced policy development toward totally smokefree schools. Based on these results and the changing environment, the smokefree efforts are being integrated into the broader context of health promoting schools.

Infection control practices and beliefs of Minnesota dental hygienists and dental assistants.

To obtain comprehensive information about the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Minnesota dental hygienists and registered dental assistants, a questionnaire was mailed to random samples of both groups in the fall of 1988. Most assistants and hygienists claimed to always wear gloves, but substantially fewer indicated always wearing a mask. Use of eye protection showed even lower compliance, with less than half of either group routinely using protective eyewear or a face shield. Assistants and hygienists reported incurring numerous needlesticks and instrument injuries. A contributing factor may be that many staff were still recapping needles with an unprotected hand. Most people who had not been vaccinated against hepatitis B said that they would be immunized if their employer or health insurance paid for it. Less than one-half of either group felt knowledgeable about infection control. Only one-third of assistants and less than one-half of hygienists claimed to be familiar with the Centers for Disease Control's "Recommended Infection Control Practices for Dentistry." This is consistent with assistants' and hygienists' reported infection control related behaviors. Other than gloving, many recommended infection control measures--masking, wearing protective eyewear and uniforms, hepatitis B immunization, and proper handling of sharps--were not employed by a substantial number of respondents. Many respondents indicated insufficient knowledge to safely and effectively care for patients with hepatitis B, hepatitis B carriers, or individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This is reflected in the relatively small percentages of respondents who indicated willingness to treat these patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)