[Considerable regional differences in patient injuries after primary hip and knee arthroplasty and between orthopedic departments depending on surgical volume]. / Regional skillnad i incidensen av skador efter ledprotesoperation.

Hip and knee arthroplasties are mostly successful procedures; however, patient injuries may occur and should be reported to Löf, the Swedish patient insurance. This study investigated the incidence of patient injuries after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in the Swedish regions, differences in incidence depending on annual surgical volume, and types of approved injuries. Approved patient injuries were related to the total number of hip and knee arthroplasties registered in the Swedish Arthroplasty Register 2012-2021. The national incidence was 11.4 and 8.1 per 1,000 hip and knee arthroplasties respectively and varied in the regions from 30.4 to 4.9 and 15.4 to 5.4 per 1,000 hip and knee arthroplasties respectively. Orthopedic departments with higher annual volumes of performed arthroplasties had a lower proportion of patient injuries. Infection was the most common patient injury, followed by nerve lesions and mechanical complications. The differences may be due to underreporting and varying quality of care in the regions. A centralization of hip and knee arthroplasties may be beneficial.

Patient-Reported Anxiety or Depression Increased the Risk of Dissatisfaction Despite Improvement in Pain or Function Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Swedish Register-Based Observational Study of 8,745 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Remaining pain and functional limitations may cause dissatisfaction in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Furthermore, anxiety and depression are associated with remaining postoperative symptoms and dissatisfaction. We investigated if patient-reported anxiety or depression increased the risk of dissatisfaction 1 year after TKA in patients who improved in pain or function. METHODS: Data on primary TKAs due to osteoarthritis between 2017 and 2019 were obtained from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Out of 14,120 patients, 9,911 completed the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and satisfaction rate with the result of the surgery. According to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International criteria patients were classified as responders (improved in pain or function) or nonresponders. Anxiety and depression were assessed through EuroQol-5 Dimension 3 levels. Log-linear regression models estimated the risk ratios (RRs) for dissatisfaction in all patients and stratified by age groups (< 65, 65 to 74, and > 74 years). There were 8,745 patients who were classified as responders whereas 11% were defined as dissatisfied. The proportion of patients who reported anxiety or depression was 35% preoperatively and 17% postoperatively. RESULTS: Anxiety or depression increased the risk of dissatisfaction preoperatively (RR 1.23, 95% confidence interval = 1.09 to 1.40) and postoperatively (RR 2.65, confidence interval 2.33 to 3.00). Patients younger than 65 years reported preoperative anxiety or depression to a greater extent but did not have an increased risk of dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported anxiety or depression preoperatively and postoperatively are important and potentially treatable factors to consider, as they were found to increase the risk of dissatisfaction after TKA despite improvements in pain or function.

[Prescription of osteoporosis drugs and secondary fracture prevention still at low levels and with large regional variation]. / Låg förskrivning av läkemedel för osteoporos inom Sverige.

In Sweden, secondary prevention of fragility fractures through osteoporosis medication is directed by national guidelines. According to these, postmenopausal women and men who have suffered a fragility fracture should be assessed and pharmaceutical treatment of osteoporosis should always be considered. For the most serious fractures (hip and vertebral fractures), treatment can be initiated immediately. Despite this, previous studies have shown that the level of pharmaceutical treatment is low. In Sweden, osteoporosis drugs are predominantly administered by prescription, but about one-third of drugs are nowadays administered on-site in the health care system, which is not recorded in national registers. We have estimated the total amount of osteoporosis drugs through aggregated sales statistics. Our results show that medical treatment with osteoporosis drugs is still at low levels, covering approximately 5 percent of the population aged 70 or older, with clear differences between regions.

Characterizing the Individuals Who Regain or Maintain Walking Ability after a Hip Fracture: Insights Into Physical Resilience.

OBJECTIVES: Maintaining walking ability is key to healthy aging. Hip fractures often lead to declined walking ability. This study investigated characteristics of individuals who regained walking ability after a hip fracture, an expression of physical resilience. DESIGN: Register-based cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 55,467 Swedish residents aged ≥60 years with a first hip fracture (71% women, mean age = 82.3 ± 8) included in the Swedish Hip Fracture Register. METHODS: Information about diseases, medications, and socioeconomic (SES) factors came from registers. Individuals were classified by prefracture walking ability (independent or assisted walking) and whether their walking ability 4 months post-fracture was maintained (physical resilience or nonresilience). Cluster analyses were conducted among individuals who maintained their walking ability to assess different physical resilience profiles. RESULTS: At baseline, 38,493 individuals walked independently (69%), and 16,982 were assisted walkers. Half of the independent walkers maintained their walking ability 4 months post-fracture. Among them, 3 clusters were identified: a "Low SES, Low Disease" cluster (n = 8580, mean age 81.1 ± 7.5); a "High SES, Low Disease" cluster (n = 7778, mean age 76.7 ± 7.4); and a third "High SES, High Disease" cluster (n = 4320, mean age 77.7 ± 7.4). Sixty percent of the pre-assisted walkers maintained their level of assisted walking ability. Also among them, 3 clusters were identified: a "Low SES-Independent Living" cluster (n = 3077, mean age 85.5 ± 7.1); a second "Care Home" cluster (n = 2912, mean age 87.0 ± 6.5) with a high proportion with dementia diagnosis; and a last "High SES" cluster (n = 4044, mean age 83.0 ± 7.0) with the largest proportion of men. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Physical resilience is not characterized by one typical healthy profile, and it is possible to regain walking ability after a hip fracture despite unfavorable prerequisites in 1 domain. A favorable status in one domain may compensate for an unfavorable status in another, for example, a high disease burden in combination with high SES.

A short length of hospital stay is not associated with risk of readmission among hip fracture patients - a Swedish national register-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hospital length of stay (LoS) after a hip fracture likely mirrors health status; however, a too short hospitalization might increase the risk of readmission. In this national register-based study, we investigated the association between LoS after a hip fracture and the risk of readmissions. METHODS: 73,551 patients with a first hip fracture between 2012 and 2019 were followed for 4 months after discharge. LoS was categorized by cubic splines and the association with readmissions was analyzed with Cox regression models. RESULTS: The mean LoS was 11 ± 6 days and 25% of the study population had at least one readmission. Compared to the mean LoS of 9-12 days, there was a 18% decreased risk of readmission for LoS of 2-4 days (HR 0.82 [95% CI 0.77-0.87]) and 13% decrease for 5-8 days (HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.83-0.91]), when adjusting for sex, age, walking ability, ASA score, CCI, complications during hospitalization and living arrangements. For longer LoS, risk of readmission increased (13-23 days: HR 1.09 [95% CI 1.05-1.13] and 24 + days: HR 1.19 [95% CI 1.11-1.28]). The results were robust across sex, age, and living arrangements. The most common specific reasons for readmission were trauma/injury, cardiovascular and complications, and the proportions did not differ considerably between short and long LoS-categories. CONCLUSIONS: While a long LoS can be explained by the care need of the patient, a short LoS - compared to the average stay - does not increase the risk of readmission regardless of health status and hospital complications in a Swedish setting.

Secondary fracture prevention with osteoporosis medication after a fragility fracture in Sweden remains low despite new guidelines.

This national register study investigated osteoporosis medication prescriptions for secondary fracture prevention among older Swedish adults. Although prescription proportions are increasing for both men and women, they remain low, especially among individuals aged 90 and older. Improved Fracture Liaison Services could increase the prescription proportions and should be bolstered. PURPOSE: Despite clear guidelines for secondary fracture prevention among older adults, it seems undertreatment persists. We aimed to describe secondary fracture prevention with medical osteoporosis treatment in the older Swedish population. Specifically, how prescription has changed over time and if these patterns differ in sociodemographic subgroups. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2020, osteoporosis medication use was studied among all Swedish residents aged 70 and older who had a fragility fracture in the previous 5 years. Previous fragility fractures were defined as fractures of the humerus, wrist, hip, or vertebrae. Osteoporosis medication was defined as any prescription of bone-enhancing medications (including bisphosphonates and denosumab). RESULTS: Osteoporosis medication increased over the study period, especially among men. Prescription among individuals 90 + was consistently two- to threefold lower compared to 70-79- and 80-89-year-olds. In 2018-2020, 8-17% of women and 5-9% of men, depending on age, received osteoporosis medication. At the beginning of the study period, women with higher education were more likely to be prescribed osteoporosis medication, though this difference decreased over time. Prescription of vitamin D and/or calcium as the only treatment was more common than osteoporosis medications throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Despite increasing prescription proportions, medical treatment for secondary fracture prevention remains low. In addition, it is more common to be prescribed vitamin D or calcium than osteoporosis medication after a fragility fracture, contrary to current guidelines. These results indicate that there is room for improvement for Fracture Liaison Services in Sweden.

Waiting more than 24 hours for hip fracture surgery is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes for sicker patients: a nationwide cohort study of 63,998 patients using the Swedish Hip Fracture Register.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Waiting time to surgery is a modifiable risk factor in hip fracture surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the acceptable duration of waiting time. We used the Swedish Hip Fracture Register RIKSHÖFT and 3 administrative registers to explore the association between time to surgery and adverse outcomes after discharge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 63,998 patients ≥ 65 years, admitted to a hospital between January 1, 2012, and August 31, 2017 were included. Time to surgery was divided into < 12, 12-24, and > 24 hours. Diagnoses investigated were atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, and "acute ischemia" (a combination of stroke/intracranial bleeding, myocardial infarction, and acute kidney injury). Crude and adjusted survival analyses were performed. Time spent in hospital following the initial hospitalization was described for the 3 groups. RESULTS: Waiting > 24 hours was associated with an increased risk of AF (HR 1.4, 95%CI 1.2-1.6), CHF (HR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.4) and "acute ischemia" (HR 1.2, CI 1.01-1.3). However, stratifying for ASA grade revealed that these associations were present only in patients with ASA 3-4. There was no association between waiting time and pneumonia after the initial hospitalization (HR 1.1, CI 0.97-1.2), but one was found with pneumonia during hospital stay OR 1.2 (CI 1.1-1.4). Time in hospital after the initial hospitalization was similar over the waiting time groups. CONCLUSION: The associations between waiting > 24 hours for hip fracture surgery and AF, CHF, and acute ischemia suggest that shorter waiting time may reduce adverse outcomes for the sicker patients.

The Impact of Hip Fracture on Geriatric Care and Mortality Among Older Swedes: Mapping Care Trajectories and Their Determinants.

In this study, we examined the impact of hip fractures on trajectories of home care, nursing home residence, and mortality among individuals aged 65 years or more and explored the impacts of living arrangements, cohabitation, frailty, and socioeconomic position on these trajectories. Based on a linkage of nationwide Swedish population registers, our study included 20,573 individuals with first hip fracture in 2014-2015. Care trajectories during the 2 years following the fracture were visualized and compared with those of 2 hip-fracture-free control groups drawn from the general population: age- and sex-matched controls and health-matched controls identified through propensity score matching. Multistate modeling was employed to identify sociodemographic and health-related factors associated with care trajectories among hip fracture patients. We found that hip fracture patients already had worse health than the general population before their fracture. However, when controlling for prefracture health, hip fractures still had a considerable impact on use of elder-care services and mortality. Comparisons with the health-matched controls suggest that hip fractures have an immediate, yet short-term, impact on care trajectories. Long-term care needs are largely attributable to poorer health profiles independent of the fracture itself. This emphasizes the importance of adequate comparison groups when examining the consequences of diseases which are often accompanied by other underlying health problems.

Internal fixation or hip replacement for undisplaced femoral neck fractures? Pre-fracture health differences reflect survival and functional outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Internal fixation (IF) has been the standard procedure for undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs). However, there is a changing trend towards hip replacement (HR). Yet there is a knowledge gap regarding the benefits of this surgical method. We investigated functional outcomes in patients ≥ 70 years following HR compared to IF for undisplaced FNFs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥ 70 years with undisplaced FNF registered in the Swedish National Hip Fracture Registry (SHR) who underwent either IF or HR (hemiarthroplasty [HA)] or total hip arthroplasty [THA]) were investigated in terms of 1-year survival and proportion of reoperation. In a subsample with 4-month follow-up data (n = 3,623), pain, changes in living status, and physical function were additionally analyzed. RESULTS: 7,758 patients were included with a mean age of 85 years. 93% of the patients were operated on with IF, 5% with HA, and 2% with THA. Patients with THA more often lived independently and were able to walk outdoors, both before and after the hip fracture. The IF and HA groups were similar in baseline characteristics, and in functional and survival outcomes. The THA group had a 54% lower adjusted risk of 1-year mortality. The proportion of reoperations within 1 year was 9.5% for IF, 5.3% for HA, and 7% for THA. INTERPRETATION: The pre-fracture difference in health and function between patients operated on with IF, HA, and THA maked it difficult to compare outcomes of the 2 methods. Decision on surgical method must be taken on an individual level, considering patients' well-being and allocation of resources.

Function, sarcopenia and osteoporosis 10 years after a femoral neck fracture in patients younger than 70 years.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A femoral neck fracture (FNF) may have long-term effects on the patient's function, also in patients younger than 70 years. These long-term effects are not well described, since most studies have short follow-ups. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical outcome by performance-based functional tests, hand grip strength, and hip function in different subgroups. The secondary aim was to study surgical complications, bone mineral density (BMD) and occurrence of sarcopenia 10 years after a FNF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter study with a 10-year follow-up of patients aged 20-69 years with a FNF treated with internal fixation (IF). Five-times sit-to-stand test (5TSST), 4-m walking speed test, hand grip strength (HGS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were performed. A radiographic examination of the hip was performed and re-operations were registered. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip, spine and total body composition were assessed with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Present sarcopenia was determined by the combination of reduced functional performance and low fat-free mass index (FFMI). RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included. 5TSTS was normal in 45% of the patients and old age was associated with poorer performance (p<0.001). 76% of the study population had a normal speed gait and likewise, old age (p = 0.005) and walking aids (p = 0.001) were associated with poor performance. HGS was normal in 82% of the men and 64% of the women. HHS showed that 85% had a good/excellent function. A major re-operation was performed in 34% of the patients with displaced FNF and in 20% of patients with non-displaced FNF. 74% displayed osteopenia and 12% osteoporosis. 17% of the men and 38% of the women had sarcopenia. INTERPRETATION: The majority of patients less than 70 years of age with a FNF treated with IF, had normal functional tests, muscle strength and a good hip function ten years post-operatively. However, one in ten had osteoporosis, and one third was sarcopenic which indicate the importance of encouraging regular muscle preserving resistance training after hip fracture.

Substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptom states of the Forgotten Joint Score 12 after primary knee arthroplasty.

Background and purpose - Knowing how to interpret values obtained with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential. We estimated the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for Forgotten Joint Score 12 (FJS) and explored differences depending on methods used for the estimates. Patients and methods - The study was based on 195 knee arthroplasties (KA) performed at a university hospital. We used 1 item from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score domain quality of life and satisfaction with surgery, obtained 1-year postoperatively, to assess SCB and PASS thresholds of the FJS with anchor-based methods. We used different combinations of anchor questions for SCB and PASS (satisfied, satisfied with no or mild knee difficulties, and satisfied with no knee difficulties). A novel predictive approach and receiver-operating characteristics curve were applied for the estimates. Results - 70 and 113 KAs were available for the SCB and PASS estimates, respectively. Depending on method, SCB of the FJS (range 0-100) was 28 (95% CI 21-35) and 22 (12-45) respectively. PASS was 31 (2-39) and 20 (10-29) for satisfied patients, 40 (31-47) and 38 (32-43) for satisfied patients with no/mild difficulties, and 76 (39-80) and 64 (55-74) for satisfied patients with no difficulties. The areas under the curve ranged from 0.82 to 0.88. Interpretation - Both the SCB and PASS thresholds varied depending on methodology. This may indicate a problem using meaningful values from other studies defining outcomes after KA. This study supports the premise of the FJS as a PROM with good discriminatory ability in patients undergoing KA.

The obesity paradox and mortality after pathological hip fractures: a Swedish registry study.

Background and purpose - Obesity as measured by BMI has been associated with increased survival in various diseases, a phenomenon known as the "obesity paradox." It is unknown whether obesity is associated with survival after pathological fractures. We investigated the association between BMI and survival after surgery for pathological hip fracture, to improve survival prognostication, and lay grounds for further interventional nutritional studies. Patients and methods - We analyzed prospectively collected data from Swedish nationwide registry "RIKSHÖFT." The study cohort included 1,000 patients operated for a pathological hip fracture between 2014 and 2019. BMI registered on admission was available in 449 patients. Overall patient survival was measured according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate association with other potential factors that influence patient survival. Results - Overweight and obesity were associated with an increased postoperative survival in male patients with surgically treated pathological hip fractures. Multivariable analysis considering potential confounders confirmed this finding. The association was not that strong in women and did not reach statistical significance. Interpretation - BMI, a commonly available clinical parameter, is a good predictor of overall survival for patients operated on for pathological hip fracture. Incorporation of BMI in existent survival prognostication algorithms should be considered. Treatment of malnutrition in this frail group of patients is worth studying.

Hospital Length of Stay After Hip Fracture and It's Association With 4-Month Mortality-Exploring the Role of Patient Characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Hospital length of stay (LoS) is believed to be associated with higher mortality in hip fracture patients; however, previous research has shown conflicting results. We aimed to explore the association between LoS and 4-month mortality in different groups of hip fracture patients. METHODS: The study population in this Swedish register-based cohort study was 47 811 patients 65 years or older with a first hip fracture during 2012-2016, followed up for 4 months after discharge. LoS was categorized by cubic splines, and the association between LoS and mortality was analyzed with Cox regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic- and health-related factors. RESULTS: Mean LoS was 11.2 ± 5.9 days and 12.3% of the patients died within 4 months. Both a shorter and a longer LoS, compared to the reference 9-12 days, were associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]): 2-4 days 2.15 (1.98-2.34), 5-8 days 1.58 (1.47-1.69), and 24+ days 1.29 (1.13-1.46). However, in fully adjusted models, only the association with a long LoS remained: 13-23 days 1.08 (1.00-1.17) and 24+ days 1.42 (1.25-1.61). Stratifying by living arrangement revealed that the increased risk for a short LoS was driven by the group living in care homes. For patients living at home, a short LoS was associated with lower risk: 0.65 (0.47-0.91) and 0.85 (0.74-0.98) for 2-4 and 5-8 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A long LoS after a hip fracture is associated with increased 4-month mortality risk even after considering patient characteristics. The association between mortality and a short LoS, however, is explained by individuals coming from care homes (with higher mortality risk), being discharged early.

Comorbidity and the association with 1-year mortality in hip fracture patients: can the ASA score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index be used interchangeably?

BACKGROUND: Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) has been suggested to be associated with mortality in hip fracture patients, to the same extent as more expensive and time-consuming tools. However, even CCI might be too time-consuming in a clinical setting. AIM: To investigate whether the American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (ASA score), a simple grading from the anaesthesiologist's examination, is comparable with CCI in the association with 1-year mortality after a hip fracture. METHODS: The study population was patients 60 + years registered in the Swedish Hip Fracture Registry with a first-time hip fracture between 1997 and 2017 (N = 165,596). The outcome was 1-year mortality, and the exposures were ASA score and CCI. The association between comorbidity and mortality was described with Kaplan-Meier curves and analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a stepwise increase in mortality for increasing values of both ASA and CCI. The Hazard Ratios (HRs) for the highest ASA (4-5) were 3.8 (95% Confidence Interval 3.5-4.2) for women and 3.2 (2.8-3.6) for men in the fully adjusted models. Adjusted HRs for the highest CCI (4 +) were 3.6 (3.3-3.9) for women and 2.5 (2.3-2.7) for men. Reference was the lowest score value for both tools. The correlation between the tools was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Both ASA and CCI show a similar stepwise association with 1-year mortality in hip fracture patients, despite measuring different factors and capturing different individuals at risk. Since the ASA score is already accessible for health care staff, it might be preferable to aid in prioritizing vulnerable hip fracture patients at risk of adverse outcomes.

The importance of close next of kin for independent living and readmissions among older Swedish hip fracture patients.

We investigate the importance of adult children and/or cohabitation with a partner for older hip fracture patients' probability of independent living, public home care use and hospital readmission. Data from 35,066 Swedish hip fracture patients between 2012 and 2017, aged 65 years, and living at home at the time of the fracture in the Swedish Registry for Hip Fracture Patients and Treatment were linked with national registers. We applied adjusted logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazard models. In total, 959 (4.0%) women and 817 (7.3%) men had no adult children, 13,384 (56.0%) women and 3,623 (32.5%) men had no cohabiting partner and 2,780 (11.6%) women and 1,389 (12.5%) men neither had a cohabiting partner nor adult children. In comparison with women and men who had both a cohabiting partner and adult children, those without a cohabiting partner (i.e. only adult children) and those who neither had a cohabiting partner nor adult children had significantly lower probabilities of returning home (at discharge and after 4 months). They also had a greater probability of both receiving home care and having an increase in the amount of home care they receive. Having a close next of kin and hospital readmission were not associated. In conclusion, absence of a close next of kin, specifically a cohabiting partner, reduces the chance of return to independent living and increases the use of home care after a hip fracture hospitalisation. The findings highlight the importance of family support for older adults living situation after a hip fracture.

[Osteoporotic fractures - still a challenge, the Swedish National Hip Fracture Registry shows undertreatment of osteoporosis after hip fractures]. / Sekundärprevention ­ fortfarande en utmaning efter fragilitetsfraktur.

Yearly 16 000 osteoporosis related hip fractures occur in Sweden. They cause suffering for patients and high costs for society. Subsequent fractures can be reduced with osteoporosis diagnostics and treatment. 4 322 patients from two hospitals using Fracture Liaisson Services in Sweden were included to identify the rate of osteoporosis diagnostics and treatment during the first year after a hip fracture. Data between 2010-01-01 and 2018-12-31 were included from the Swedish National Hip Fracture Registry (Rikshöft). 99.2 % of all patients underwent FRAX risk assessment and DEXA was conducted on 17.3 % of patients. Women were more frequently examined with DEXA than men (21% vs 10.2 %). 6% received medical osteoporosis treatment after the fracture, women were treated more often than men (7% vs 4%). Conclusions: less than 10% received drug therapy after the first year after the hip fracture. Men underwent diagnostics and received treatment at a lower rate than women.

Prosthesis or osteosynthesis for the treatment of a pathological hip fracture? A nationwide registry-based cohort study.

AIMS: How endoprosthetic replacement compares to osteosynthesis in the treatment of pathologic hip fractures as far as functional outcome and use of healthcare resources is concerned remains largely unknown. We aimed to investigate this in a nationwide registry. METHODS: We analyzed the functional outcome after surgery for a pathological fracture of the hip in terms of post-operative pain and ambulatory capacity. The preferred surgical method depending on the level of the treating unit was also examined. Furthermore, we documented the length of hospital stay and the patterns of discharge and compared them between these two methods. RESULTS: Patients operated with an endoprosthesis reported significantly lower pain at follow-up. Both methods (endoprosthetic replacement and osteosynthesis) were equally effective in restoring the ambulatory capacity and demanded a similar length of stay in hospital. Orthopaedic surgeons working in hospitals with dedicated sarcoma teams were more likely to use a prosthesis rather than osteosynthesis, when compared to surgeons working at other university hospitals or emergency hospitals. CONCLUSION: Endoprosthetic replacement results in a better functional outcome in terms of post-operative pain without consuming more healthcare resources. Orthopaedic surgeons working in hospitals with sarcoma centers are more likely to use prostheses as compared to surgeons working at hospitals where dedicated musculoskeletal oncology teams are not available.

Trends in Hip Fracture Incidence, Recurrence, and Survival by Education and Comorbidity: A Swedish Register-based Study.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are common and severe conditions among older individuals, associated with high mortality, and the Nordic countries have the highest incidence rates globally. With this study, we aim to present a comprehensive picture of trends in hip fracture incidence and survival in the older Swedish population stratified by education, birth country, and comorbidity level. METHODS: This study is based on a linkage of several population registers and included the entire population over the age of 60 living in Sweden. We calculated age-standardized incidence rates for first and recurrent hip fractures as well as age-standardized proportions of patients surviving 30 and 365 days through the time period 1998 to 2017. We calculated all outcomes for men and women in the total population and in each population stratum. RESULTS: Altogether, we observed 289,603 first hip fractures during the study period. Age-standardized incidence rates of first and recurrent fractures declined among men and women in the total population and in each educational-, birth country-, and comorbidity group. Declines in incidence were more pronounced for recurrent than for first fractures. Approximately 20% of women and 30% of men died within 1 year of their first hip fracture. Overall, survival proportions remained constant throughout the study period but improved when taking into account comorbidity level. CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture incidence has declined across the Swedish population, but mortality after hip fracture remained high, especially among men. Hip fracture patients constitute a vulnerable population group with increasing comorbidity burden and high mortality risk.

Good clinical outcome for the majority of younger patients with hip fractures: a Swedish nationwide study on 905 patients younger than 50 years of age.

Background and purpose - Studies regarding hip fractures in young patients are rare since the patient population is small. We assessed clinical outcomes 4 months after hip fracture in patients < 50 years of age and whether there were differences between sexes and different age groups.Patients and methods - We included adult patients < 50 years with a hip fracture between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018. Baseline data were extracted from the Swedish Registry for Hip Fracture Patients and Treatment (RIKSHÖFT) and mortality data was obtained from Statistics Sweden. The outcome variables were change of walking ability, pain in fractured hip, use of analgesics, living conditions, and mortality rate at 4 months.Results - Of the 905 patients included, 72% were men and femoral neck fractures were most common (58%). 4 months after surgery, 23% used a walking aid and 7% reported severe pain. Women reported slightly more pain and higher usage of analgesics. Patients aged 40-49 reported higher usage of analgesics than patients aged 15-39, although the latter group reported more pain. Nearly all of those who lived independently before fracture did so at 4 months. The mortality rate was < 1%.Interpretation - Most patients did not use any walking aid and few had severe pain at 4 months. Furthermore, a hip fracture is not a life-threatening event in a patient < 50 years. The living conditions did not change for those who lived independently before the fracture.

The Sernbo score as a predictor of 1-year mortality after hip fracture: a registry study on 55,716 patients.

PURPOSE: Patients sustaining a hip fracture have a high mortality rate during the first postoperative year and the Sernbo score may stratify patients into a high, intermediate and low risk of death during this period. We assessed its predictive properties on patients from the National Swedish Hip Fracture Register. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 55,716 hip fracture patients, 69% women older than 65 years at surgery (registered between 2010 and 2015) with complete Sernbo scores and mortality data were studied. Receiver-operating characteristics analyses (ROC) were used. Validation of Sernbo score was performed. RESULTS: The overall 1-year mortality rate was 26%-and 17%, 27.4% and 55.6% in the low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. The ROC analysis indicated a predictive ability of the Sernbo score, with an AUC of 0.69 (CI 0.68-0.69). CONCLUSION: In this registry-based study, the easy-to-use Sernbo scoring system proved to be appropriate and useful way to identify hip fracture patients with a high-risk mortality during the first postoperative year.