The Subscapularis Interlocking Stitch for the Arthroscopic Treatment of Subscapularis Tendon Tears at the Shoulder.

Restoration of subscapularis function is essential for long-term maintenance of good clinical results for both traumatic and nontraumatic rotator cuff tears. The anatomic repair of partially and completely torn tendons from the footprint at the lesser tuberosity is the goal of surgical repair. The described technique, with a combination of an interlocking stitch and additional mattress sutures using a double-loaded suture anchor, provides reduction of the retracted tendon, sufficient pullout strength, and compression of the tendon to the footprint to facilitate healing.

Arthroscopically assisted retrograde drilling of the humeral head with a guiding device.

This manuscript describes the successful treatment of a steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the humeral head using arthroscopically assisted retrograde drilling of a stage II lesion using a guiding device. At the final follow-up 19 month post-operatively, the patient presented pain-free without functional limitations although the osteonecrosis had not been fully healed.

Biometrical analysis of the shoulder joint regarding glenoid implant dimensions for arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Reduced bone stock and difficult intraoperative orientation are challenges in glenoid replacement surgery. New implant designs and methods for fixation, such as locking screws, extra-long central pegs and/or central compression screws are targeting these issues. The objective of this study is the analysis of the glenoid dimension regarding maximum central peg diameter and peg length (PL), and maximum screw length (SL) for glenoid fixation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (n = 50) scans. Measurement of the maximum inferior glenoid diameter (GD), SL, maximum length of a 9.9, 10 and 11.4 mm central peg (PL) in the transverse plane; glenoid version (GV), humeral head diameter (HHD). Two independent measurements. RESULTS: Mean age: 49.0 ± 15.7 years (17-80) (n = 20 female, 49.6 ± 16.0; n = 30 male, 48.6 ± 15.7). Mean values of measurement were GD: 28.9 ± 3.7 mm (21-39); SL: 34.1 ± 4.9 mm (26-44); PL 9.9 mm: 19.4 ± 4.3 mm (9-30); PL 10 mm: 19.0 ± 4.4 mm (8-30); PL 11.4 mm: 16.5 ± 4.1 mm (7-26) with significant gender differences (p = 0.001; p = 0.022; p = 0.001); GV: -0.6° ± 4.9° (-10 to 11); HHD: 50.0 mm ± 4.9 (41-61). There was good correlation between PL and SL (r = 0.32, p = 0.024) and for GD and PL (r = 0.61, p = 0.001; r = 0.57, p = 0.001; r = 0.96, p = 0.001). The ratio of HHD and GD was very constant with 0.6 ± 0.07. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate the high interindividual variability of glenoid morphology including significant gender-related differences. The good correlation between humeral head size and GD and maximum central PL can be helpful for cases with reduced bone stock in decision-making about implant size and bone grafting.

MR imaging of the intraarticular disk of the acromioclavicular joint: a comparison with anatomical, histological and in-vivo findings.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize MRI features of the intraarticular disk of the acromioclavicular joint. DESIGN: We studied the appearance of 11 acromioclavicular joints of six cadavers (subjects aged 57-89 years at the time of death) and six healthy shoulders on T1-weighted, T2 (TSE)-weighted, STIR and PD (fat saturated) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compared the findings with observations during dissection and histological examination. RESULTS: Macroscopic examinations showed two wedge-shaped disks underneath the superior and above the inferior joint capsule in nine specimens. In two specimens the acromioclavicular joints were degenerated. Histologically, the disk tissue consisted of fibrocartilage whereas the joint cartilage was partly degenerated, containing zones of fibrocartilage amidst degenerated hyaline cartilage, which may explain the similar signal intensity of both structures in all sequences used. MR appearance of the intraarticular structures of the acromioclavicular joint was similar in cadaveric and healthy shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: The difficulties related to imaging the acromioclavicular joint may be explained by the anatomy. Similar signal intensity of cartilage and disk may be explained by their similar histological structure (fibrocartilage). MRI findings should be interpreted with respect to the variable anatomy. These results may serve as a basis for further radiological studies of the acromioclavicular joint.

Correlation of ultrasonographic findings to Tossy's and Rockwood's classification of acromioclavicular joint injuries.

The aim of this study was to examine the value of ultrasonography to assess high-graded acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. We propose a new sonographic technique to evaluate the state of the soft tissues, specifically the deltoid and trapezoid muscles and their common fascia. Radiologic findings graded by Tossy's and Rockwood's classification were compared with sonographic findings for 92 patients with high-grade injuries of the AC joint. Of the 92 patients, 39 underwent operative treatment. A total of 36 patients were radiographically classified as type II and 56 with type III injuries, according to Tossy. In 4 cases, ultrasonography displayed disrupted insertions of the deltoid and, in 30 patients, of the trapezius muscle. All patients classified as type V, eight of 18 patients classified as type IV, nine of 31 patients classified as type III and two of 28 patients classified as type II injuries, according to Rockwood's classification, displayed a disrupted deltoid and trapezius insertion and common fascia on ultrasound (US). Comparison between sonographic and intraoperative findings revealed a sensitivity for diagnosing delta muscle detachment and fascial disruption of 100%. No true-negative results occurred. For trapezius muscle detachment, 24 of 30 patients were diagnosed correctly and nine true-negative results occurred. False-positive results were not encountered. The sensitivity was 80%. The specificity was 100%. We conclude that US provides additional information concerning soft tissues and that it may be useful to delineate type III injuries, in which nonoperative vs. operative treatment is still being debated. Diagnosis based only on sagittal X-ray examination may under- or over-estimate the soft tissue injury involved. Additional transaxillary X-ray as well as an US evaluation may need to be included in the diagnostic process. We propose this new sonographic technique for future studies.