Phase I and pharmacological study of two schedules of the antifolate edatrexate in combination with cisplatin.

The antifolate edatrexate has shown moderate activity against cancers of the head and neck and non-small cell lung cancer, as has cisplatin. Edatrexate demonstrates synergy with cisplatin in transplanted tumor models. This Phase I study was designed to evaluate two schedules of administration of cisplatin in combination with escalating doses of edatrexate, in a population consisting mainly of patients with these two cancers. The starting dose of edatrexate was 40 mg/m2. Dose escalation was to occur in 10-mg/m2 increments; the planned maximum dose level for study was 80 mg/m2. A total of 39 patients were registered. Eleven were treated on schedule A: cisplatin 120 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, and edatrexate weekly. Twenty-eight patients were assigned to schedule B: cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and edatrexate, both given every 2 weeks. On schedule A, the maximum tolerated dose of weekly edatrexate was 40 mg/m2, with dose-limiting toxicities of leukopenia, mucositis, and renal insufficiency. On schedule B, the maximum tolerated dose of biweekly edatrexate was 80 mg/m2, with leukopenia and mucositis as dose limiting. For schedule A, pharmacokinetic studies suggested a possible effect of cisplatin on the day 8 clearance of edatrexate. Studies on patients on schedule B did not show a clear effect of cisplatin on the day 15 edatrexate clearance. On schedule A, 5 of 9 evaluable patients had major responses (1 complete); whereas on schedule B, 8 of 25 patients had major responses (1 complete). Responses were seen in both head and neck and non-small cell lung cancer patients. For Phase II studies, use of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and edatrexate 80 mg/m2, both given biweekly, is recommended.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin, a new antifolate.

The 10-deazaaminopterins are a new class of rationally designed antifolates demonstrating greater antitumor effects than methotrexate in murine tumor models and human tumor xenografts. Their design was aimed at improving membrane transport and polyglutamylation in tumor cells, resulting in increased intracellular accumulation and enhanced cytotoxicity. Compared with other 4-aminofolate analogues, 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin (PDX) is the most efficient permeant for the RFC-1-mediated internalization and substrate for folylpolyglutamate synthetase. PDX demonstrates greater in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy than methotrexate or edatrexate. We undertook a Phase I study with PDX to identify the potential toxicities and define an optimal dose and schedule. Thirty-three patients were enrolled, all of whom had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and were treated previously with a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens. Initially, PDX was administered weekly for 3 weeks in a 4-week cycle. Mucositis requiring dose reduction and/or delay in the first cycle occurred in four of six patients treated at the initial dose level (30 mg/m2), making this the maximal tolerated dose for PDX given on this schedule. The treatment schedule was then modified to every 2 weeks. Twenty-seven patients were treated twice weekly with a total of 102 four-week cycles (median, 2 cycles/patient). Mucositis was the dose-limiting toxicity, with grade 3 and 4 mucositis occurring in the first two patients treated at the 170 mg/m2 dose level. Other toxicities were mild and reversible. No neutropenia was observed. The recommended Phase II dose is 150 mg/m2 biweekly. At that dose level, the mean area under the curve was 20.6 micromol x h, and the mean terminal half-life was 8 h. Two patients with stage IV NSCLC had major objective responses, and five patients had stable disease for 7 (two patients), 9 (one patient), 10 (one patient), and 13 months (one patient). PDX is a new antifolate with manageable toxicity and evidence of antitumor activity in NSCLC. A Phase II trial in NSCLC and a Phase I trial with paclitaxel are under way. These studies will also quantitate the expression of genes controlling internalization (RFC-1) and polyglutamylation of PDX in tumor cells as correlates of response.

Phase I trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: With preclinical evidence of synergy, this dose-finding trial examining the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine given with prophylactic filgrastim for the treatment of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma was undertaken. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma received vinorelbine as an intravenous push immediately followed by docetaxel as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once every 2 weeks at 1 of 7 different dose levels. Vinorelbine was escalated from 15 mg/m(2) (Level I) to 45 mg/m(2) (Level VII) and docetaxel was increased from 50 mg/m(2) (Level I) to 60 mg/m(2) (Level VII). Prophylactic corticosteroids and filgrastim were employed prospectively. RESULTS: After completion of dose Level VII, accrual was terminated because Phase II dose intensity of both agents had been reached and further escalation was believed to be unsafe. At dose Level VII, one episode of first-cycle febrile neutropenia and a death after three treatment cycles due to Haemophilus influenzae sepsis (Grade 5 toxicity according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute) without neutropenia were noted. In all, 209 treatment cycles were administered and febrile neutropenia was observed in only 4 of these treatments (1.9%). Bacteremia occurred in three patients (four episodes) in the absence of neutropenia. Symptomatic onycholysis was observed in three patients. Clinically significant peripheral neuropathy and fluid retention were rare. Confirmed partial responses were noted in 10 patients for a response rate of 37% (95% confidence interval, 20-57%). CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine at a dose of 45 mg/m(2), both given every 2 weeks, can be combined safely to achieve Phase II dose intensity of both agents. An ongoing Phase II trial will define the activity of this treatment combination.

Phase II trial of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel and vinorelbine are active agents in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and demonstrate preclinical synergism perhaps, in part, through their inactivation of the proto-oncogene bcl-2. We show that docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)) and vinorelbine (45 mg/m(2)) can be safely combined when given on an every 2-week schedule with filgrastim, with encouraging antitumor activity observed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five chemotherapy naïve patients with advanced NSCLC received vinorelbine as an intravenous push immediately followed by docetaxel as a 1-hour intravenous infusion once every 2 weeks. Prophylactic corticosteroids, ciprofloxacin, and filgrastim were used. RESULTS: We delivered median doses of 450 mg/m(2) of vinorelbine and 600 mg/m(2) of docetaxel. The major objective response rate was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34% to 68%). With a median follow-up of 14 months, the predicted median survival time was 14 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 60% (95% CI, 44% to 80%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in five patients and five (1.3%) of 384 treatments. No dose-limiting neurotoxicity occurred. Symptomatic onycholysis and excessive lacrimation were observed after several months or more of therapy. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine 45 mg/m(2), both given every 2 weeks, is a highly active combination for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Filgrastim largely obviates neutropenic fever and allows for the single-agent dose-intensity of both drugs to be delivered. The occurrence of certain late toxicities can limit use in some cases and suggests that the combination could also be beneficial in settings requiring briefer, fixed periods of treatment, such as in induction or postoperative therapy.

Staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma: comparison of CT and MR imaging.

OBJECTIVE: This article compares the accuracy of CT with that of MR imaging in staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled in a prospective staging protocol based on the International Mesothelioma Interest Group staging system. Sixty-five patients underwent CT and MR imaging and a surgical procedure (excluding percutaneous needle biopsy) to stage and resect the tumor. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. CT and MR scans were interpreted independently by observers who were unaware of the results of the other imaging study; these imaging findings were compared with the results of surgery and pathologic examination. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for eight of 10 features revealed by imaging showed no statistically significant differences between CT and MR imaging. However, MR imaging was superior to CT in revealing invasion of the diaphragm (A(z) = .55 for CT versus .82 for MR imaging) and in revealing invasion of endothoracic fascia or solitary resectable foci of chest wall invasion (A(z) = .46 for CT; A(z) = .69 for MR imaging). Several anatomic regions could not be evaluated because positive findings at surgery were rare. CONCLUSION: CT and MR imaging are of nearly equivalent diagnostic accuracy in staging malignant pleural mesothelioma. MR imaging is superior to CT in revealing solitary foci of chest wall invasion and endothoracic fascia involvement and in showing diaphragmatic muscle invasion; however, this advantage does not affect surgical treatment. For cost reasons, CT should be considered the standard diagnostic study before therapy.

Induction chemotherapy employing dose-intense cisplatin with mitomycin and vinblastine (MVP400), followed by thoracic surgery or irradiation, for patients with stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy before surgery or irradiation has improved the survival of patients with Stage III nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Encouraged by earlier results with preoperative MVP (cisplatin [120 mg/m(2) or 25 mg/m(2)/week], vinblastine, and mitomycin) for Stage IIIA patients with clinically apparent mediastinal (N2) disease, the authors conducted a Phase II trial of the safety and efficacy of induction MVP400 with the dose intensity of cisplatin doubled from 25 to 50 mg/m(2) per week. METHODS: From October 1992 to March 1996, 37 patients with Stage IIIA (26) or Stage IIIB (11) NSCLC began the MVP400 induction chemotherapy program. Four doses of cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)), 7 doses of vinblastine, and 2 doses of mitomycin were given over 9 weeks. Patients received either surgery or irradiation after induction treatment. RESULTS: Overall, the response rate was 65% (95% confidence interval, 49-81%) with a complete resection rate of 67%. The median survival was 17 months, with 66% of patients alive at 1 year. Complete resection and Stage IIIA involvement were favorable prognostic indicators for survival. No Stage IIIB patients underwent a complete resection. Myelosuppression was the most common side effect. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Although high response and complete resection rates were again demonstrated, results with the MVP400 regimen were not improved over those achieved with MVP regimen tested earlier with Stage IIIA (N2) patients. The authors continue to recommend MVP as an induction chemotherapy regimen for clinical trials.

Phase I study of the sequential administration of edatrexate and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The antifolate edatrexate and the microtubule-stabilizing agent paclitaxel have both demonstrated single-agent activity in lung and breast cancer. In vitro, the sequential combination of edatrexate followed by paclitaxel produced synergistic antitumor effects. This trial was designed to find the maximum tolerated doses of edatrexate and paclitaxel when given every two weeks utilizing this sequential schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with solid tumors received edatrexate intravenously on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel intravenously as a three-hour infusion on days 2 and 16 of each 28-day cycle. Edatrexate was escalated from 40 to 120 mg/m2 and the paclitaxel dose fixed at 135 mg/m2. When the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, edatrexate was fixed at 120 mg/m2 and paclitaxel escalated to 175 and 210 mg/m2. RESULTS: All 34 patients were assessable. The maximum tolerated doses were 120 mg/m2 of edatrexate and 210 mg/m2 of paclitaxel. Grade 3 myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, leukopenia, and an infusion-related reaction occurred. Eight patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and one with bladder cancer achieved major objective responses. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II doses are 120 mg/m2 of edatrexate days 1 and 15 and 175 mg/m2 of paclitaxel as a three-hour infusion days 2 and 16 of a 28 day cycle. These results warrant phase II trials of the combination leading to phase III studies comparing the two drugs to a single agent to confirm the preclinical evidence of synergy.

Comparison of phased-array and body coils for MR imaging of liver.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare liver lesion conspicuity using torso phased-array (TPA) and body coils with two pulse sequences. METHODS: Sixty patients with 125 focal hepatic lesions underwent T2-weighted fast spin-echo (T2-FSE) and fast multiplanar inversion recovery (FMPIR) imaging with a standard body coil and with a TPA coil. The first 30 patients were scanned identically in both coils with four acquisitions; the second 30 were scanned with four acquisitions in the body coil and two in the TPA coil. RESULTS: Liver-lesion contrast-to-noise (C/N) was significantly higher for the TPA coil both with four acquisitions (P< 0.001) and with two acquisitions (P < 0.002) using FMPIR, compared to with four acquisitions in the body coil. Liver-lesion C/N for T2-FSE was equivalent in both coils. Liver-lesion C/N was significantly higher (P<0.01) for FMPIR than T2-FSE both in the body coil and in the TPA coil. CONCLUSION: Liver-lesion C/N was significantly higher using the TPA coil rather than the body coil. Imaging time can be reduced by decreasing the number of acquisitions with the TPA coil.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the postpneumonectomy chest: normal and abnormal findings.

To determine the normal findings at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the postpneumonectomy space (PPS), and to evaluate the utility of MRI in detection of recurrent tumor in the postpneumonectomy chest, 32 MRI scans were performed in 31 patients at varying time intervals after pneumonectomy. Eleven patients also had 12 computed tomography (CT) scans performed at the same time to evaluate possible tumor recurrence. Of the 32 scans, 5 demonstrated complete obliteration of the fluid containing PPS, and 4 showed gas in the PPS; the remainder (n = 23) demonstrated persistence of fluid-filled spaces of varying size. The presence of a fibrotic rim of tissue was constant. In 11 patients with clinically suspected tumor recurrences, both CT and MRI were obtained: the two modalities performed with similar accuracy in diagnosing tumor recurrence at 16 sites; CT detected opposite-lung metastatic nodules not seen on MRI in one patient, and a rib metastasis described as "indeterminate" on MRI in a second patient. MRI detected a focus of recurrence in the PPS that was indeterminate on CT. There is considerable variability in the amount of fluid seen in the PPS on MRI. CT remains the procedure of choice for routine follow-up or in suspected tumor recurrence in the postpneumonectomy patient; MRI can be helpful if the CT scan is nondiagnostic or equivocal.

Phase II trial of chloroquinoxaline sulfonamide (CQS) in patients with stage III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Chloroquinoxaline sulfonamide (CQS) was one of the first agents identified by the human tumor colony-forming assay (HTCFA) as possessing antitumor activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prior phase I studies had suggested that plasma concentrations equivalent to those showing efficacy in the HTCFA could be reliably attained in humans. This phase II study assessed the antitumor activity of CQS while using an adaptive control pharmacokinetic modelling system to attain targeted plasma levels of this novel compound. METHODS: A group of 20 patients with stage III or IV NSCLC received CQS as a 1-h weekly infusion at an initial dose of 2 g/m2. In all patients, 24-h plasma concentrations of CQS were measured. Patients with levels < 100 micrograms/ml had dose increases determined by their 24-h levels and pharmacokinetic parameters obtained from two prior phase I trials of this agent. These individuals had 24-h CQS levels repeated after their second weeks' treatment and doses were readjusted if the target concentration was not reached. Antitumor response assessment was made every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 18 attained the target plasma concentration, and 16 of these achieved this initially or with just one dose adjustment. No major objective antitumor responses were observed (major response rate 0%, 95% CI 0-17%). CQS was well tolerated with hypoglycemia being the most clinically significant toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: When given on this schedule CQS is inactive in NSCLC despite the fact that the target concentration was achieved in 90% of patients. The ability of the HTCFA to identify active agents remains unproved.

Phase II study of the combination of the novel bioreductive agent, tirapazamine, with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Tirapazamine is a bioreductive compound synergistic with cisplatin in preclinical testing. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of tirapazamine with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with unresectable stage III-B and IV non-small-cell lung cancer who had not received prior chemotherapy were given tirapazamine (390 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) over two hours followed one hour later by cisplatin (75 mg/m2) i.v. over one hour every 21 days. RESULTS: Five of 20 patients (25%) had major objective responses (95% confidence interval, 11%-50%). Median duration of response was eight months with a one-year survival of 40%. Toxicities included temporary hearing loss (25%), muscle cramping, diarrhea, skin rash and nausea/vomiting. No grade 3 or 4 hematologic or renal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tirapazamine plus cisplatin appears to be safe and active in the treatment of advanced non-small lung cancer without a substantial increase in toxicity compared to cisplatin alone. A phase III randomized study compared the combination to cisplatin alone has completed accrual. Further evaluation of tirapazamine with other active agents and in multi-modality therapy is warranted.

High-dose edatrexate with oral leucovorin rescue: a phase I and clinical pharmacological study in adults with advanced cancer.

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of i.v. edatrexate with p.o. leucovorin. Thirty-one adults with advanced solid tumors received edatrexate as a 2-h infusion, once a week for 3 weeks, recycled every 28 days. p.o. leucovorin (10 mg/m2, every 6 h for 10 doses) began 24 h later. All had urinary alkalinization and p.o. hydration. Nine dosage levels ranging from 120 to 3750 mg/m2 were explored. Fatigue, epistaxis, nausea/emesis, mucositis, rash, myalgias, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transient elevations of serum aspartate transferase were observed. Leukoencephalopathy with clinical manifestations occurred in two patients (one had prior cranial irradiation). Pharmacokinetic studies carried out at the 120- and 1080-mg/m2 dose levels revealed no significant difference in the elimination half-life at the two dose levels studied and no significant intrapatient variability between day 1 and day 8 edatrexate administration. Serum edatrexate levels measured using a dihydrofolate reductase inhibition assay correlated with those by high-performance liquid chromatography. Three major and two minor antitumor responses occurred. The maximum tolerated dose was 3750 mg/m2, with grade 3 or 4 leukopenia (one patient), stomatitis (one patient), and leukoencephalopathy (one patient). Because of the occurrence of leukoencephalopathy, further study of high-dose edatrexate with leucovorin rescue is not recommended.

Predictors of survival in malignant tumors of the sternum.

From 1930 to 1994, 54 patients with primary malignant tumors of the sternum were seen. Fifty patients were first seen with a mass, and one half of them also had pain in the sternal region. Two patients had no symptoms at presentation. Among 39 solid tumors were 26 chondrosarcomas, 10 osteosarcomas, 1 fibrosarcoma, 1 angiosarcoma, and 1 malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Of these, 25 were low-grade and 14 were high-grade tumors. Among 15 small cell tumors were 8 plasmacytomas, 6 malignant lymphomas, and 1 Ewing's sarcoma. Partial or subtotal sternectomy was done in 37 patients and total sternectomy in 3. Of the remaining 14 patients, 3 had local excision; 10 had external radiation or chemotherapy without operation, or both; and 1 had no treatment. All but one patient treated by wide resection (N = 40) had some form of skeletal reconstruction of the chest wall defect. Thirty-one (78%) underwent repair with Marlex mesh, and in 25 this was combined with methyl methacrylate. The skin edges were closed per primum in 32 patients; 8 required muscle, omentum, or skin flaps. Resection in chondrosarcomas yielded a 5-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) of 80% (median follow-up, 17 years). The 5-year survival in osteosarcomas was 14%. Resection was curative in 64% of low-grade sarcomas but in only 7% of high-grade sarcomas. In small cell tumors, resection and radiation were helpful for local control; all failures were a result of distant metastases. We conclude that primary sarcomas of the sternum though uncommon are potentially curable by wide surgical excision. With rigid prostheses to repair the skeletal defects, the surgical complication rates are low. Overall survival after complete surgical resection is related to tumor histologic type and grade.

Adrenal masses in patients with malignancy: prospective comparison of echo-planar, fast spin-echo, and chemical shift MR imaging.

PURPOSE: To assess echo-planar, fast spin-echo (SE), and chemical shift magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in differentiation of adrenal adenomas from malignant adrenal masses in patients with known malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight adrenal masses (23 malignant, 45 benign) in 68 patients with known malignancy were examined with echo-planar, fast SE with and without fat suppression, and chemical shift pulse sequences. RESULTS: With a cutoff T2 value of 75 msec, the sensitivity of echo-planar imaging for benign lesions was 82%, and specificity was 96%. With a cutoff adrenal mass-to-spleen signal intensity ratio of 0.80, the sensitivity of fast SE imaging for benign lesions was 53%, and specificity was 96%. With a cutoff adrenal mass-to-spleen ratio of 0.55, the sensitivity of chemical shift imaging for benign lesions was 80], and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSION: Chemical shift imaging and calculated T2 values from echo-planar imaging are promising techniques for differentiation of adrenal adenomas from malignant adrenal masses and can obviate biopsy.

Ifosfamide plus high-dose cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy.

This study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ifosfamide that could be given with high-dose cisplatin to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously treated with non-platin-containing chemotherapy and to assess the efficacy of this combination. Twenty-three patients with inoperable NSCLC treated with one prior chemotherapy regimen received continuous infusion ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2 per day with MESNA for 5 days every 35 days and cisplatin 120 mg/m2. After one patient who received cisplatin as a single dose developed grade 4 nephrotoxicity and myelosuppression, cisplatin was given in four divided doses (30 mg/m2 per day) and the ifosfamide dose was lowered to 1.0 g/m2 per day, infused over 4 days. Dose-limiting grades 3 and 4 leukopenia was seen in 43%. A major objective response rate of 9% was observed. The 1-year survival was 30%, with a median survival of 6.4 months. The MTD of ifosfamide administered with cisplatin (30 mg/m2 per day for 4 consecutive days) to this population of patients is 1.0 g/m2 daily for 4 days. This combination produced limited anticancer activity and significant toxicity. Excessive toxicity was observed when cisplatin was given as a single dose with ifosfamide, and this schedule should not be used.

Non-neoplastic causes of high signal intensity at T2-weighted MR imaging after treatment for musculoskeletal neoplasm.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe a variety of non-neoplastic causes of high-signal-intensity areas seen on T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained after treatment for malignant musculoskeletal neoplasm. DESIGN: MR examinations obtained after treatment for malignant musculoskeletal neoplasm in 11 patients were reviewed. The examinations of these patients were selected because at least one MR study of each patient showed high-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted images at or near the site of the original tumor. The MR imaging findings were correlated with results of biopsy in four patients, and with information from follow-up radiologic examinations and the patients' medical records in all cases, to determine the cause of the high-signal-intensity areas. RESULTS: Non-neoplastic entities responsible for high-signal-intensity areas included postsurgical seroma, hematoma, postradiation therapy changes, fat necrosis and seroma, surgical hemostatic packing material, intercalary bone allograft, strut bone graft, atrophic muscle, and herniated colon and bladder. Knowledge of details of the surgical procedure and the time interval since surgery or irradiation aided in accurate interpretation of the findings, but did not allow immediate biopsy to be deferred in every case. CONCLUSION: High-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted images in patients previously treated for malignant musculoskeletal neoplasm may represent a variety of entities other than residual or recurrent neoplasm, even in the presence of a mass. The MR imaging findings should be interpreted in conjunction with details of the specific clinical circumstances to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary biopsy.

Effectiveness and toxicity of preoperative therapy in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer including the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience with induction MVP in patients with bulky mediastinal lymph node metastases (Clinical N2).

The use of preoperative chemotherapy with mitomycin, vinblastine and cisplatin (MVP) has led to improved complete resection rates and survival in Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer with bulky, ipsilateral, mediastinal lymph node metastases (Clinical N2 disease). The addition of preoperative irradiation has also been explored with results not substantially different from preoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone. While preoperative chemotherapy has been shown to be feasible, the toxicity of both the chemotherapy and the subsequent resection is of concern with an overall treatment-related mortality of nearly 8%. The careful selection of patients, swift management of neutropenia, and meticulous perioperative pulmonary care has the potential to reduce the mortality from multimodality therapy. Having shown survival benefit in multiple single-institution and randomized trials, induction chemotherapy followed by surgery or irradiation is now the treatment of choice for patients with Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer with mediastinal lymph node metastases.

Echoplanar MR imaging for characterization of adrenal masses in patients with malignant neoplasms: preliminary evaluation of calculated T2 relaxation values.

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this study to assess the utility of echoplanar MR imaging for distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses in patients with known malignant neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with 31 adrenal masses and a known malignant neoplasm underwent breath-hold echoplanar MR imaging with a repetition time of 6000 msec and four echo times (40, 80, 120, 160 msec) on a 1.5-T unit before biopsy. Subsequently, 10 masses were shown to be malignant at histologic examination, 12 masses were benign at histologic examination, and nine were thought to be benign because they had not changed in size at follow-up imaging. Mean lesion size was 2.4 +/- 2.1 cm. T2 calculations using regions of interest in the liver and adrenal mass were performed in each patient. RESULTS: The mean calculated T2 value of benign adrenal masses was 70.3 msec (SD, 11.6 msec) versus 104.6 msec (SD, 35.2 msec) for malignant adrenal masses (p = .013). Using a cutoff T2 value of 84 msec, 19 (90%) of 21 benign masses and nine (90%) of 10 malignant masses were correctly classified. The mean adrenal/liver T2 ratio was 1.4 (SD, 0.25) for benign lesions, and 2.1 (SD, 0.78) for malignant lesions (p = .017). Using a cutoff ratio of 1.60, 19 (90%) of 21 benign lesions and eight (80%) of 10 malignant lesions would have been correctly classified. CONCLUSION: This preliminary work suggests that obtaining T2 calculations from echoplanar MR images of adrenal masses is a useful technique for distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses in patients at risk for adrenal metastasis.

Phase II trial of a 75-mg/m2 dose of docetaxel with prednisone premedication for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: A prior Phase II study of a 100-mg/m2 dose of docetaxel conducted at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) demonstrated a 38% response rate with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 76% of the patients and a grade 2 or greater rash or infusion-related reaction in 41% and 34% of the patients, respectively. The current Phase II study sought to determine the activity of a 75-mg/m2 dose of docetaxel to establish whether this lower dose, combined with prednisone, ameliorates toxicity. METHODS: Twenty untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received a 1-hour 75-mg/m2 dose of docetaxel every 21 days. Fifty milligrams of prednisone were administered twice the day before chemotherapy and once each of the next 3 days. Patients' disease-related symptoms were assessed prospectively using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS). RESULTS: All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. Five patients had a major objective response (25%; 95% confidence interval, 11-50%). The median duration of response was 9.1 months. The projected 1-year survival was 71%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 70% of the patients. Grade 2 or greater rash and infusion-related reactions decreased to 25% each. Analysis of the LCSS measurements found that six of nine component symptoms improved on Day 22, and all improved when baseline measurements were compared with the best value for each patient during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel administered at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 21 days shows significant antitumor activity in untreated patients with NSCLC: Neutropenia is comparable with that observed at a 100-mg/m2 dose. The number of infusional reactions and rash decreased when docetaxel at this dose was administered with prednisone. Based on response rates observed in trials using a 100-mg/m2 dose with similar degrees of neutropenia, a 100-mg/m2 dose with steroid pretreatment is recommended future trials.