ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Improvements in acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and surgical techniques have facilitated pre-pectoral immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Outer shell texturing is a key risk factor for anaplastic large cell lymphoma, prompting this evaluation of reconstruction with nano-textured rounded implants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive patients underwent 72 pre-pectoral ADM-assisted (fenestrated SurgiMend™) IBRs using nano-textured implants (Sebbin™). Patients were invited to complete a satisfaction questionnaire, including aesthetic outcome (linear scale 0-10) during follow-up. RESULTS: Average mastectomy weight was 300 g (range=83-1,018 g). After a mean follow-up of 18.3 month, 2 patients (2.8%) had minor wound complications. One patient suffered nipple necrosis. Capsular contracture occurred in 5 cases (6.9%) and significant rippling in one case. No implants were lost. Patient-reported aesthetic outcomes had a mean score of 9.3 (range=3-10; N=71). CONCLUSION: Pre-pectoral ADM-assisted IBR using semi-smooth implants following NSM is reliable and safe, with a low incidence of complications and high patient satisfaction.
Subject(s)
Acellular Dermis , Breast Implantation , Breast Implants , Mammaplasty , Mastectomy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Implantation/instrumentation , Breast Implantation/methods , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Conservative Treatment/methods , Equipment Design , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Anaplastic/epidemiology , Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Anaplastic/etiology , Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Anaplastic/prevention & control , Mammaplasty/instrumentation , Mammaplasty/methods , Mastectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Pectoralis Muscles/pathology , Pectoralis Muscles/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Tissue Expansion/instrumentation , Tissue Expansion/methods , Tissue Scaffolds , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Wire-guided localization (WGL) has been the mainstay for localizing non-palpable breast lesions before excision. Due to its limitations, various wireless alternatives have been developed. In this prospective study, we evaluate the role of radiation-free wireless localization using the SAVI SCOUT® localization at a European centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This technique was evaluated in a prospective cohort of 20 patients. The evaluation focused on clinical and pathological parameters in addition to patient and physician acceptance. RESULTS: SAVI SCOUT reflectors (n=23) were deployed to localize 22 occult breast lesions and one axillary lymph node in 20 patients. The mean deployment duration was 5.6 min, with a mean distance from the lesion of 0.6 mm. The migration rate was 0% and the mean identification and retrieval time was 25.1 min. In patients undergoing therapeutic excision for malignancy (n=17), only one (5.9%) required reoperation for positive surgical margins. Radiologists and surgeons rated the technique as better than WGL and patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that wireless localization using SAVI SCOUT® is an effective and time-efficient alternative to WGL with excellent physician and patient acceptance.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Diagnostic Imaging/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Infrared Rays , Mammography/instrumentation , Mammography/methods , Middle Aged , RadarABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients presenting with clinically positive lymph nodes remains controversial. METHODS: A computer-aided search of the literature regarding SLNB in clinically node-positive breast cancer treated with NAC was carried out to identify the false negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph node identification rate (IR), and axillary pathological complete response (pCR). RESULTS: Nineteen articles were used in the analysis yielding 3,398 patients. The pooled estimate of the FNR was 13% and that of the IR was 91%. The adjusted pCR rate was 47%. A trend toward significance was observed with only clinical stage N1 (cN1) disease whereby clinical stage N1 was associated with an increased pCR rate when compared to N2 or N3 disease (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB after NAC in biopsy-proven node-positive patients results in reasonably acceptable FNR and IR, making it a valid alternative management strategy to axillary dissection. More refined patient selection and optimal techniques can improve the FNR and IR in this patient population.
