Evaluation of the SmartClip™ Nonradioactive Seed, a Novel Wireless Localization Method for the Breast: Initial Clinical Experience and Surgical Outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Wire localization has been the gold standard for breast localization of non-palpable lesions for decades. This technique remains robust but has disadvantages relative to scheduling, complications of vasovagal reactions in placement, wire migration, or transection. With more modern technologies available, several implantable markers have been developed to allow uncoupling of localization by radiology and the surgical procedure on the same day. This study summarizes our experience with the EnVisio Navigation System™ utilizing SmartClip™ as the implantable tissue localization marker. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective database of benign and malignant breast disease was used to perform a review of 100 consecutive patients who underwent SmartClip™ localized breast and axillary procedures in 2021. Demographic information, localization accuracy, associated surgical procedure(s) with resultant pathology findings, margin status for malignancies, and re-excision rate were collected. RESULTS: The localized breast lesion or lymph node was excised and SmartClip™ retrieved in all cases, confirmed by intraoperative specimen radiograph. The distribution of gender and race/ethnicity among the patients who underwent surgery reflects the community population and frequency of breast cancer development among men versus women. 45.1% of the cases involved malignancy, as determined pre-operatively. Positive margins requiring re-excision constituted 18.2% of cases. In twenty-six patients, two or three SmartClips™ were placed per case for either a bracketed lesion, two separate breast lesions, and/or a breast lesion and lymph node. CONCLUSION: Although this study is limited in patient number, it demonstrates safety of this technique and its reliability in guiding the surgeon directly to the lesion(s) of concern.

Social determinants among Black people during pregnancy following a short interpregnancy interval.

BACKGROUND: Short interpregnancy interval has been shown to be a key contributor to infant mortality. Black pregnant people have a higher incidence of short interpregnancy interval than people of other races and ethnicities, as well as higher rates of infant mortality. Understanding the factors related to racial disparities in short interpregnancy interval and infant mortality are a public health priority. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the relationship between social determinants of health and interpregnancy interval in Black pregnant people by comparing those with a short interpregnancy interval defined as <18 months with those with a referent interpregnancy interval defined as ≥18 months. STUDY DESIGN: This was a nested case-control study from a prospective cohort analyzing social determinants of health in 576 postpartum patients at an urban medical center, 2011-2021. Sociodemographic, pregnancy, and maternal characteristic data were collected from participants' medical records. Structured interviews measured participants' health behaviors, physical environment, social support, health literacy, and structural drivers. Differences in social determinants of health among Black study participants were compared between those with a short interpregnancy interval (<18 months) and those with a referent interpregnancy interval (≥18 months). The odds ratios were calculated to assess the association between short interpregnancy interval and social determinants. Factors with significant differences between the short interpregnancy interval and referent interpregnancy interval groups in Black participants were compared with that of White groups for social context. RESULTS: Black participants with a short interpregnancy interval were more likely to report financial support from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.1), negative feelings toward the pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.9), choosing not to breastfeed because they do not like it (odds ratio ,12.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-543.1), not receiving prenatal care as early as desired (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-7.2) because of consid- eration of pregnancy termination (odds ratio, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-30.5) and less likely to report low levels of social support (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.8) than Black participants with a referent interpregnancy interval. CONCLUSION: Social determinants of health that differed between participants with a short interpregnancy interval and those with a referent interpregnancy interval were Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children support, feelings toward the pregnancy, social support, breastfeeding intent, and delayed prenatal care because of consideration of abortion. Previous studies examining infant mortality risk factors used White people as the referent group when analyzing social determinants. Our study focused specifically on understanding the lives of Black pregnant people so that future public health initiatives focused on social determinants may attenuate the racial disparity of infant mortality in the United States.

Clinically significant bleeding complications of percutaneous breast biopsy: 10-year analysis and a proposed management algorithm.

PURPOSE: Bleeding is a well-known risk of percutaneous breast biopsy, frequently controlled with manual pressure. However, significant bleeding complications may require further evaluation or intervention. Our objectives were to assess the rate, type, and periprocedural management of significant bleeding following percutaneous breast biopsy and to evaluate the success of any interventions. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed percutaneous breast biopsies at our institution over a 10-year period with documented post-biopsy bleeding complications in radiology reports. Patients were included if bleeding required intervention (interventional radiology [IR], surgery, or other), imaging follow-up, or clinical evaluation for symptoms. Additional data included patient demographics, anticoagulation, history of bleeding diathesis, biopsy details, bleeding symptoms, histopathology, and intervention details, if applicable. RESULTS: Of 5820 unique patients who underwent percutaneous biopsy, 66 patients (66/5820; 1.1%) comprising 71 biopsy cases met inclusion for clinically significant bleeding with 5/71(7.0%) requiring surgery, 9/71(12.7%) requiring IR intervention, and 57/71(80.3%) requiring lower-acuity intervention including prolonged observation (5/57;7.0%), overnight admission (4/57;5.6%), aspiration (4/57;5.6%), lidocaine and suture (2/57;2.8%), primary care visit (7/57;10.0%), blood transfusion (1/57;1.4%), emergency room visit (6/57;8.5%), surgery consult (8/57;11.3%), IR consult (2/57;2.8%), and follow-up imaging (22/57;31.0%). Most patients requiring intervention by surgery or IR had acute signs of bleeding immediately after biopsy while most patients with delayed signs of bleeding required lower-acuity interventions. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant bleeding is extremely rare after percutaneous breast biopsy and is most often managed non-surgically. Developing an institutional algorithm for management of bleeding complications that consults IR before surgery may help decrease the number of patients managed surgically.

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on social determinants of health among an inner-city obstetrical population.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health are a well-described influencer of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality. It is unclear how societal changes secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic altered the social determinants of health among pregnant patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate differences in the social determinants of health among patients who experienced pregnancy before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of an ongoing prospective cohort study examining the social determinants of health in postpartum patients at a single inner-city academic medical center. The planned secondary analysis was to compare the social determinants of health between patients that experienced societal changes before the pandemic and patients that experienced societal changes during the pandemic. Patients were included in the pandemic group if they delivered on or after March 30, 2020; moreover, patients in the pandemic group were compared with those who delivered before March 30, 2020 (referent group). Medical records were used to collect sociodemographic, pregnancy, and infant outcome data. The study participants were interviewed to collect detailed information regarding their perceived social, emotional, and physical environment as indicators of social determinants of health. Generalized linear modeling estimated the influence of social determinants of health  on births during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Overall, 577 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 452 (78%) delivered before the COVID-19 pandemic and 125 (22%) delivered during the pandemic. Patients who delivered during the pandemic were more likely to report limited social or emotional support (relative risk, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.59) and higher race-based discrimination (relative risk, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.53). Mothers in the prepandemic group were more likely to have used federally funded programs, such as Medicaid, food stamps, and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, during their pregnancy. Furthermore, the referent group reported more limited access to transportation. In addition, mothers in the prepandemic group were more likely to initiate prenatal care at a later gestational age and have fewer total prenatal care visits. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented changes in pregnancy care, and these were reflected in social determinants of health. It is imperative that we focus on the social determinants of health that were mitigated during this time and their effects on maternal and infant health.