Tadalafil versus pentoxifylline in the management of diabetic kidney disease: a randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of tadalafil (TAD) versus pentoxifylline (PTX) in the management of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Some animal studies and clinical trials reported that tadalafil and pentoxifylline have a reducing effect on different blood glucose parameters and lipid profiles which contribute to progress the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) to DKD. METHODS: From February 2022 to March 2023, 90 patients with type 2 DM and DKD (micro-albuminuria) were enrolled in this randomized-controlled study. The patients were randomized into three equal groups: control group, TAD group, and PTX group. The three groups received traditional blood glucose lowering therapy + ramipril 10 mg PO. The TAD group also received tadalafil 20 mg PO every other day. The PTX group also received pentoxifylline 400 mg PO twice daily. RESULTS: Both TAD and PTX groups produced statistically significant improvement in the primary outcomes by a significant reduction in Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) which was pronounced by a reduction percentage of-47.47%, -53.73% respectively. In addition to a significant decrease in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) (mmol/mol), Fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (2-h PPG) (p < 0.001). Only the PTX group showed a significant increase in Cr Cl and a significant decrease in S. Cr (p < 0.001). Only the TAD group showed a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (p < 0.001), while the PTX group showed a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (p-value 0.011), and triglyceride (p-value 0.002). Both TAD and PTX groups showed a decrease in tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) which was significant only in the PTX group (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) (p < 0.001), and an increase in urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated Lipocalin (uNGAL) (p-value 0.850, 0.014 respectively) which was significant only in the PTX group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tadalafil or pentoxifylline may serve as an effective adjuvant therapy for patients with diabetic kidney disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05487755, July 25, 2022.

Repurposing metformin as adjuvant therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with mesalamine: A randomized controlled double-blinded study.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a type of inflammatory bowel disease associated with persistent inflammation. Animal studies proved the efficacy of metformin in UC. AIM: To investigate the potential role of metformin and its protective pathways in patients with UC. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled, and double-blinded clinical trial that included 60 participants with mild to moderate UC and was divided randomly into two groups (n = 30). For 6 months, the mesalamine group received 1 g of mesalamine three times daily (t.i.d.). For six months, the metformin group received mesalamine 1 g t.i.d. and metformin 500 mg twice daily. A gastroenterologist evaluated patients at baseline and 6 months after starting the treatment in order to measure serum levels of zonulin, sphingosine 1 phosphate (S1P), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Biopsies from the colon were used to measure gene expression of zonula occuldin-1 (ZO-1), signal transducer and activator of factor-3 (STAT-3), and intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). The numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and partial Mayo score were also assessed for each patient. RESULTS: When compared to the mesalamine group, the metformin group demonstrated a statistical decrease in serum IL-6, zonulin, TNF-α, SIP, gene expression of ICAM-1 and STAT-3, and a significant increase in colonic ZO-1 when compared to the mesalamine group. The metformin group also showed a significant decrease in NRS and partial Mayo score index in comparison with the mesalamine group. CONCLUSION: Metformin may be a promising additional therapy for UC patients. Trial registration identifier: NCT05553704.

Retraction to "Study to compare the effect of casirivimab and imdevimab, remdesivir, and favipiravir on progression and multi-organ function of hospitalized COVID-19 patients".

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1515/med-2023-0768.].

Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic stimulates research works to find a solution to this crisis from starting 2020 year up to now. With ending of the 2021-year, various advances in pharmacotherapy against COVID-19 have emerged. Regarding antiviral therapy, casirivimab and imdevimab antibody combination is a type of new immunotherapy against COVID-19. Standard antiviral therapy against COVID-19 includes Remdesivir and Favipiravir. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab) compared to standard antiviral therapy in reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). METHODS: 265 COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction confirmed patients with indication for antiviral therapy were included in this study and were divided into 3 groups (1: 2: 2): Group A: REGN3048-3051 antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab), group B: Remdesivir, group C: Favipiravir. The study design is a single-blind non-randomized controlled trial Mansoura University Hospital owns the study's drugs. The duration of the study was about 6 mo after ethical approval. RESULTS: Casirivimab and imdevimab achieve less need for O2 therapy and IMV, with less duration of this need than remdesivir and favipiravir. CONCLUSION: Group A (casirivimab and imdevimab) achieve better clinical outcomes than groups B (remdesivir) and C (favipiravir) intervention groups.

Study to compare the effect of casirivimab and imdevimab, remdesivir, and favipiravir on progression and multi-organ function of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a progress in research to find a solution to this pandemic. Also, various advances in pharmacotherapy against COVID-19 have emerged. Regarding antiviral therapy, casirivimab and imdevimab are antibodies combination against COVID-19. Standard antiviral therapy against COVID-19 includes remdesivir and favipiravir. The objectives were to compare progression and multi-organ function of hospitalized COVID-19 patients between these three antiviral groups. 265 COVID-19 hospitalized patients were included in this study and were divided into 3 groups (1:2:2), respectively, Group (A): casirivimab and imdevimab, group (B): remdesivir, and group (C): favipiravir. The design of the study is a single blind non-randomized controlled trial. This study is a phase IV clinical trial (post-marketing study). The duration of the study was about 6 months after receiving the ethical approval. Casirivimab and imdevimab achieved less case progression as presented by lower World Health Organization scale (P < 0.05 in comparing group A with B and C) and better multi-organ functions as presented by lower Sequential Organ Function Assessment score (P < 0.05 in comparing group A with B and C) than remdesivir and favipiravir. From all these results, it is concluded that Group A (casirivimab and imdevimab) produces better outcomes than B (remdesivir) and C (favipiravir) intervention groups.

Clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of casirivimab & imdevimab, remdesivir, and favipravir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Background: Corona Virus disease - 2019 (COVID-19) disease induces scientific research to find a control to this pandemic from 2020 year up to now. Recently, various advances in pharmacotherapy against COVID-19 have emerged. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab), Remdesivir, and Favipravir in the COVID-19 patients. Study design: This study is a single-blind non-Randomized Controlled Trial (non-RCT). The drugs of the study are prescribed by lectures on chest diseases, faculty of medicine-Mansoura University. The duration of the study is about six months after ethical approval.265 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were used to represent the COVID-19 population and were assigned into three groups in a ratio of (1:2:2) respectively, Group (A) received REGN3048-3051(Antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab)), group (B) received remdesivir, and group (C) received favipravir. Results: Casirivimab and imdevimab achieve less 28-day mortality rate, and less mortality at hospital discharge than Remdesivir, and Favipravir. Conclusion: From all of these results, it is concluded that Group A (Casirivimab & imdevimab) achieves more favorable outcomes than B (Remdesivir) & C (Favipravir) intervention groups. Clinical trial registration: NCT05502081, 16/08/2022, Clinicaltrials.gov.

Mebendazole; from an anti-parasitic drug to a promising candidate for drug repurposing in colorectal cancer.

AIMS: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) predominantly contributes to cancer-related mortalities secondary to distant metastasis. This study aimed at investigating anti-tumor activity and safety of mebendazole in patients with mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized double blind placebo-controlled study enrolled 40 mCRC patients who were randomized into two groups; the control group (n = 20) which received 6 cycles of bevacizumab with FOLFOX4 plus placebo tablets BID and mebendazole group (n = 20) which received 6 cycles of bevacizumab with FOLFOX4 plus mebendazole 500 mg orally BID for 12 weeks. Computed tomography scanning and serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), liver and renal parameters were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks. One-year overall survival and progression free survival (PFS) were also determined. Data were analyzed using paired, independent sample-t-tests, Mann-Whitney U, Chi-Square and Kaplan-Meier tests and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. KEY FINDINGS: Mebendazole was well tolerated and its addition to bevacizumab and FOLFOX4 enhanced tumor response to treatment which was translated by significant improvement of overall response rate 12 weeks after intervention [10 % (2) versus 65% (13) for control and mebendazole groups, respectively; p = 0.000] and significant elevation of PFS (median: 3 and 9.25 months for control and mebendazole groups, respectively; p = 0.000). Furthermore, mebendazole produced significant decline in VEGF level (p = 0.006) with non-significant variation in CEA level (p = 0.063). SIGNIFICANCE: Mebendazole may represent an attractive candidate for drug repositioning against mCRC secondary to its safety and efficacy in enhancing tumor response to chemotherapy. GOV ID: NCT03925662, retrospectively.

A Potential Role of Ethosuximide and Pentoxifylline in Relieving Abdominal Pain in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients Treated with Mebeverine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is defined as an association of chronic abdominal pain with bowel habit abnormalities, without clear organic dysfunction. T-type calcium channels and low-grade mucosal inflammation are linked to abdominal pain; however, medical treatments for IBS abdominal pain are largely ineffective. In this study, we investigated if pentoxifylline (PTX) and ethosuximide could potentially alleviate abdominal pain in patients with IBS treated with mebeverine. METHODS: We recruited 150 patients from Tanta University Hospital to this randomized, prospective, and double blinded study. Patients were randomly allocated to three groups (n = 50). Group 1 (mebeverine) received 135 mg mebeverine three times/day (t.i.d). Group 2 (ethosuximide group) received 135 mg mebeverine t.i.d plus 250 mg ethosuximide twice daily (b.i.d) and group 3 (PTX group) received 135 mg mebeverine t.i.d plus 400 mg PTX b.i.d. Patients were assessed by a gastroenterologist at baseline and 6 months after therapy. Serum interleukin-8 (IL-8), IL-6, tumor necrosis-α (TNF-α), fecal myeloperoxidase, and fecal neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were measured before and after therapy. The numeric pain rating scale (NRS) was also assessed before and after therapy. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Reduced NRS scores and abdominal pain relief. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Decreased inflammatory biomarkers. RESULTS: After 6 months, groups 2 and 3 showed a significantly greater reduction in serum IL-8, IL-6, TNF-α, fecal myeloperoxidase, and fecal NGAL levels when compared to group 1 after therapy. Both groups 2 and 3 showed significant reductions in NRS scores when compared to the group 1. CONCLUSION: Ethosuximide and PTX may be promising, novel adjunct drugs to antispasmodics for relieving abdominal pain in patients with IBS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identifier: NCT04217733.

Pentoxifylline, a nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor, in adjunctive therapy in patients with irritable bowel syndrome treated with mebeverine.

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal condition marked by chronic bowel pain or discomfort, as well as changes in abdominal motility. Despite its worldwide prevalence and clinical impact, the cause of IBS is unknown. Inflammation could play a fundamental role in the development of IBS. The aim of this study was to examine whether pentoxifylline, a competitive nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor, is useful in alleviating abdominal pain in IBS patients treated with mebeverine. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, and prospective clinical study that included 50 outpatients who met the inclusion criteria for IBS. Patients are allocated randomly into two groups (n = 25). Group 1 (mebeverine group) received mebeverine 135 mg three times daily (t.i.d) for three months. Group 2 (pentoxifylline group) received mebeverine 135 mg t.i.d and pentoxifylline 400 mg two times daily for three months. Patients were assessed by a gastroenterologist at baseline and three months after the medication had been started. The serum levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, fecal Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin (NGAL), and fecal myeloperoxidase were measured at the start and after three months of therapy. The Numeric Pain Rating scale (NRS) was assessed at baseline and after therapy. RESULTS: the pentoxifylline group showed a significant decrease in the level of measured biomarkers and a significant decrease in NRS. CONCLUSION: Pentoxifylline could be a promising adjuvant anti-inflammatory drug in the treatment of abdominal pain in IBS patients treated with mebeverine.

Open-label pilot study of ethosuximide as adjunctive therapy for relieving abdominal pain related to Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: There is clear evidence for an association between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and visceral hypersensitivity. This clinical study aimed to assess the adjunct role of ethosuximide, an antiepileptic drug with T-type calcium channel blocking activity, in the relieving of IBS-related abdominal pain. METHODS: This is a prospective, 3-month, randomized and controlled study of parallel groups. Fifty outpatients who met the inclusion criteria participated in the trial. Patients were allocated randomly: 25 received mebeverine 135 mg three times daily (t.i.d), whereas the other 25 received mebeverine 135 mg t.i.d and ethosuximide 500 mg t.i.d. At baseline and 12 weeks after starting the drug, patients were evaluated by a gastroenterologist. Serum tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), faecal myeloperoxidase and faecal neutrophile gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were tested before and after treatment. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) was assessed before and after three months of therapy. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: After 12 weeks, the ethosuximide group showed a statistically and significantly greater reduction in the serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, faecal myeloperoxidase and faecal NGAL in comparison with the control group after the treatment. Moreover, the ethosuximide group showed a statistically significant decrease in NRS compared with the mebeverine group. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Ethosuximide could be a promising adjunct to antispasmodics in the treatment of IBS patients. Trial registration identifier: NCT04217733.

Comparative study evaluating antihistamine versus leukotriene receptor antagonist as adjuvant therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE: Investigating the efficacy and safety of rupatadine (RUP) versus montelukast (MON) as adjuvant therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: From December 2018 to December 2019, 75 patients with active RA were enrolled in this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. The patients were randomized into three groups (n = 25 in each group); methotrexate (MTX) group which received MTX 15-25 mg/week plus placebo tablet once daily; MTX/RUP group which received MTX plus RUP 10 mg once daily; and MTX/MON group which received MTX plus MON 10 mg once daily. The treatment duration was 3 months. At baseline and 3 months after treatment, blood samples were collected for the biochemical analysis of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukins 8 and 17 (IL-8, IL-17), E-selectin, and clusterin (CLU) levels. Clinical and functional assessments using Disease Activity Score-CRP (DAS28-CRP) and Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) were performed. RESULTS: Both RUP and MON produced clinical and functional improvements which were translated by significant improvements in DAS28-CRP score and MDHAQ. Rupatadine significantly reduced all measured parameters (P < 0.05) except for IL-17 and CLU. Montelukast significantly decreased all measured variables (P < 0.05) except for E-selectin. Interleukin-8 was positively correlated with IL-17 and CLU, while hs-CRP was positively correlated with E-selectin and body mass index (BMI). Both drugs were well tolerated; somnolence was the common side effect for RUP. No neuropsychiatric events were reported with MON. CONCLUSION: Rupatadine or montelukast may serve as a potential adjuvant therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis secondary to the preliminary evidence of efficacy and safety. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03770923, December 10, 2018.

Nigella sativa as a promising intervention for metabolic and inflammatory disorders in obese prediabetic subjects: A comparative study of Nigella sativa versus both lifestyle modification and metformin.

AIM: This study aimed at evaluating the effect of Nigella sativa (NS) on anthropometric, metabolic and inflammatory parameters and examining its related molecular mechanisms in obese prediabetic individuals as compared to both lifestyle modification (LM) and Metformin (Met). METHODS: This study included 117 obese prediabetic subjects who were randomized into LM group which followed controlled diet and exercise regimen, metformin group received metformin 500 mg tablets twice daily and NS group received NS oil soft gelatin capsules 450 mg twice daily. Anthropometric (weight, BMI), glycemic, lipid, inflammatory parameters and genetic expressions of Sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) and p53 genes were assessed before and six months after interventions. RESULTS: Post-intervention pairwise comparison revealed that, NS was statistically similar to metformin in improving anthropometric, glycemic parameters and SIRT1 gene expression. There was non-significant difference between LM and NS regarding their effects on anthropometric and most of glycemic parameters. Lifestyle modification group showed significantly higher HOMA-B and SIRT1 expression than NS and metformin. Nigella sativa improved lipid panel and significantly reduced TNF-α level and Castelli risk index-I as compared to other interventions. CONCLUSION: Nigella sativa uniquely improved lipid panel and significantly suppressed inflammation. Therefore, Nigella sativa may represent a promising intervention for obese prediabetic subjects. Clinicaltrial.gov ID: NCT03925714.

Comparative randomized trial evaluating the effect of proton pump inhibitor versus histamine 2 receptor antagonist as an adjuvant therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The development of drug resistance remains the major obstacle to clinical efficacy of cancer chemotherapy. Consequently, finding new therapeutic options for cancerous patients is an urgent need. Sixty newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients were recruited from Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Egypt prospectively randomized to three groups (n = 20 for each group). Group one (control group) received R-CHOP standard chemotherapy {Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxyldaunorubicin (Doxorubicin)®, Vincristine (oncovin)®, prednisolone in the first five days of cycle}, group two received lansoprazole (LAN) 60 mg p.o. bid for only one week before starting each of cycle + R-CHOP and group three received famotidine (FAM) 40 mg p.o. once daily one week before cycle and continues daily through the cycle + R-CHOP for six cycles. Blood samples were obtained for biochemical analysis of transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), interleukin-9 (IL-9), nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and Caspase 3 before and after six cycles of therapy. The obtained data showed that LAN and FAM resulted in significant decrease in (LDH, TGF-ß, bFGF and IL-9, respectively) and significant increase in (Caspase-3). In addition, LAN produced a significant elevation in the response rate compared to the control group or the FAM group. Both LAN and FAM as adjuvant therapy represents a promising anticancer strategy in DLBCL by modulation of malignancy homeostasis mechanisms and boosting chemotherapy antitumor effects without further toxicity. In addition, LAN has a synergetic effect in improving the response rate.Trial registration Clinical Trial.gov Identifier: NCT0364707.

A comparative study on the anti-inflammatory effect of angiotensin-receptor blockers & statins on rheumatoid arthritis disease activity.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: : Rheumatoid artherits (RA) is a refractory disease and the imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in favor of pro-inflammatory cytokines has been implicated in pathogenesis of RA. In this context, the aim of the present study was to compare the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of candesartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker, and atorvastatin in RA patients. METHODS: : In this single-blinded parallel randomized placebo controlled study, the patients recruited between December 2017 and May 2018 were categorized into three groups: group 1 included 15 RA patients who served as control group and received traditional therapy (+ placebo); group 2 included 15 RA patients who received traditional therapy + candesartan (8 mg/day); and group 3 included 15 patients who received traditional therapy + atorvastatin (20 mg/day) for three months. Clinical status in RA patients was evaluated by Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and morning stiffness before and three months after treatment. All groups were subjected to biochemical analysis of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1beta (IL-1ß) and malondialdehyde (MDA) before and three months after treatment. RESULTS: : Both candesartan and atorvastatin treated groups showed significant decrease in serum levels IL-1ß and TNF-α, acute-phase reactants (CRP and ESR), number of swollen joint and patient global assessment. This was also associated with improvement in disease activity and quality of life regarding DAS28 and HAQ-DI as compared to baseline data and the control group. Atorvastatin group showed significant decrease in the serum level of oxidative stress marker (MDA). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: : Both candesartan and atorvastatin showed anti-inflammatory effect and immunomodulatory effects leading to improvement in clinical status and disease activity in RA patients. However, atorvastatin was superior to candesartan through its anti-oxidant effect.

A Clinical Study Evaluating the Effects of Fluvastatin on Serum Osteoprotegerin Levels in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

Osteoprotegerin (OPG), a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family, has been identified as a critical regulator of bone resorption. Considering the possible role of OPG in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and in the osteoclastogenesis suppression effects of statins, the present study aims to investigate the effects of fluvastatin on serum levels OPG and disease activity score (DAS) in patients with RA. Forty patients with RA were randomized in a placebo-controlled trial to receive 40 mg fluvastatin or placebo as an adjunct to existing disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy (methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine). Patients were followed up over 12 weeks. OPG and disease activity variables were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. After 12 weeks, the OPG level was significantly increased in the fluvastatin group compared to the placebo group. DAS-28 was significantly decreased in the fluvastatin group compared to the placebo group. C-reactive protein (CRP), morning stiffness, swollen joint count (SJC), and tender joint count (TJC) were significantly decreased in the fluvastatin group compared to the placebo group; however, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), modified health assessment questionnaire (MHAQ), and visual analogue screen (VAS) were not changed significantly. In conclusion, fluvastatin administration could increase the OPG levels and improve disease activity variables in patients with RA. Therefore, fluvastatin may serve a potential benefit in the treatment of RA patients.

Evaluation of the anti-osteoporotic effects of metformin and sitagliptin in postmenopausal diabetic women.

Osteoporosis is the most important metabolic bone disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. Several studies have documented that metformin is osteogenic in vitro. In contrast, others showed no effect of metformin on the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Incretin hormones have received much attention because of their beneficial effects beyond glycemia, including on bone health. The study evaluated the anti-osteoporotic effect of metformin and sitagliptin in postmenopausal diabetic women. Forty postmenopausal diabetic women were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group 1 received metformin (Glucophage(®) 500 mg) 1 tablet twice daily, and group 2 received sitagliptin (Januvia(®) 100 mg) 1 tablet/day, for 12 weeks. Fasting blood and urine samples were collected for measurement of serum total alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin, and urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD). Laboratory tests were measured at baseline, after 4 and 8 weeks, and at the end of the study. Bone mineral density of the anterior posterior lumbar spine was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12 weeks of the intervention. In the metformin-treated group, the mean values for all markers of bone turnover at 12 weeks of treatment were not significantly different from baseline. In group 2, the mean serum total ALP was significantly decreased, serum osteocalcin levels were non-significantly decreased gradually by 10% at 12 weeks, while urinary DPD decreased significantly and was then maintained at 28% decrease at 12 weeks. In conclusion, metformin is neither osteogenic nor has anti-osteoporotic effect, while sitagliptin could positively regulate bone metabolism.

Alpha-lipoic acid improves subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress plays an important role in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is a powerful antioxidant that may have a protective role in diabetic cardiac dysfunction. AIM: We investigated the possible beneficial effect of alpha-lipoic acid on diabetic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in children and adolescents with asymptomatic type 1 diabetes (T1D). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty T1D patients (aged 10-14) were randomized to receive insulin treatment (n = 15) or insulin plus alpha-lipoic acid 300 mg twice daily (n = 15) for four months. Age and sex matched healthy controls (n = 15) were also included. Patients were evaluated with conventional 2-dimensional echocardiographic examination (2D), pulsed tissue Doppler (PTD), and 2-dimensional longitudinal strain echocardiography (2DS) before and after therapy. Glutathione, malondialdhyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), Fas ligand (Fas-L), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), and troponin-I were determined and correlated to echocardiographic parameters. RESULTS: Diabetic patients had significantly lower levels of glutathione and significantly higher MDA, NO, TNF-alpha, Fas-L, MMP-2, and troponin-I levels than control subjects. The expression of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was also increased in diabetic patients. Significant correlations of mitral e'/a' ratio and left ventricular global peak systolic strain with glutathione, MDA, NO, TNF-alpha, and Fas-L were observed in diabetic patients. Alpha-lipoic acid significantly increased glutathione level and significantly decreased MDA, NO, TNF-alpha, Fas-L, MMP-2, troponin-I levels, and TGF-beta gene expression. Moreover, alpha-lipoic acid significantly increased mitral e'/a' ratio and left ventricular global peak systolic strain in diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that alpha-lipoic acid may have a role in preventing the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy in type 1 diabetes.

Effects of three different fibrates on intrahepatic cholestasis experimentally induced in rats.

Background. Activation of PPAR α modulates cholesterol metabolism and suppresses bile acid synthesis. This study aims to evaluate the effect of PPAR α agonists, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, and gemfibrozil, on acute cholestasis induced by ethinylestradiol (EE) plus chlorpromazine (CPZ) in rats. Method. 100 male albino rats (150-200 gm) were divided randomly into 10 equal groups. Control group received 1% methylcellulose vehicle; disease group received CPZ plus EE for 5 consecutive days; four groups received either ursodeoxycholic acid, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, or gemfibrozil for 7 days; 2 days before EE + CPZ, three other groups received one of the three fibrates after GW6471, a selective PPAR α antagonist in addition to EE + CPZ. The final group received GW6471 alone. Results. The three fibrates showed marked reduction (P < 0.05) in serum levels of ALP, GGT, ALT, AST, total bile acids, bilirubin, TNF α , and IL-1 ß and in hepatic malondialdehyde level as well as a significant increase in bile flow rate (P < 0.05) in addition to improvements in histopathological parameters compared to diseased group. In groups which received GW6471, these effects were completely abolished with fenofibrate and partially blocked with bezafibrate and gemfibrozil. Conclusion. Short-term administration of fibrates to EE/CPZ-induced intrahepatic cholestatic rats exerted beneficial effects on hepatocellular damage and apoptosis. Fenofibrate anticholestatic effect was solely PPAR α dependent while other mechanisms played part in bezafibrate and gemfibrozil actions.

Antifibrotic effect of aloe vera in viral infection-induced hepatic periportal fibrosis.

AIM: To investigate the anti-oxidative and anti-fibrotic effects of aloe vera in patients with liver fibrosis. METHODS: Aloe vera high molecular weight fractions (AHM) were processed by patented hyper-dry system in combination of freeze-dry technique with microwave and far infrared-ray radiation. Fifteen healthy volunteers as the control group and 40 patients were included. The patients were randomly subdivided into two equal groups: the conventional group was treated with placebo (starch), and AHM group was treated with 0.15 gm/d AHM, both for 12 consecutive weeks. The patients were investigated before and after treatment. Serum activity of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), hyaluronic acid (HA), transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) and matrixmetalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) were determined. The reduced glutathione (GSH) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in liver were assayed and the expression of hepatic α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) was identified by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: At the start of the study, the hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed fibro-proliferated bile ductules, thick fibrous septa and dense inflammatory cellular infiltration in the patients before treatment. The use of AHM for 12 wk significantly ameliorated the fibrosis, inhibited the inflammation, and resulted in minimal infiltration and minimal fibrosis compared to the conventional group. The enzyme activities of the liver (ALT, AST and ALP) were attenuated after treatment in both groups, and the decrease in the AHM group was more significant as compared with the conventional group. Similar to the AST, the MDA levels were significantly higher before treatment, and were attenuated after treatment in both groups. In contrast, the hepatic glutathione content in the patients were decreased significantly in the AHM group compared to the controls. The serum levels of the fibrosis markers (HA, TGF-ß and MMP-2) were also reduced significantly after treatment. The expression of α-SMA was modified in patients before and after treatment as compared with the normal controls. In the conventional group, there was only thin and incomplete parenchymal α-SMA positive septum joining the thickened centrilobular veins, while in the AHM group, few α-SMA positive cells were present in sinusoid and lobule after treatment. CONCLUSION: Oral supplementation with AHM could be helpful in alleviating the fibrosis and inflammation of hepatic fibrosis patients.

Effect of clarithromycin and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of montelukast in human volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, is used in the treatment of asthma. The objective of the study reported here was to determine whether multiple doses of clarithromycin or fluconazole affect the pharmacokinetics of montelukast. METHODS: This was a four-phase cross-over study with a washout period of 2 weeks between phases. In phase 1, 12 volunteers received a single oral dose of 10 mg montelukast. In phase 2, the volunteers received a single, oral dose of 1,000 mg clarithromycin once daily for 2 days, followed by, on day 3, a single oral dose of 10 mg montelukast co-administered with clarithromycin. In phase 3, a single oral dose of 50 mg fluconazole was given once daily for 6 days, followed by, on day 7, a single oral dose of 10 mg montelukast co-administered with 50 mg fluconazole. In the last phase (phase 4), a single oral dose of 150 mg fluconazole was given once daily for 6 days, followed by, on day 7, a single oral dose of 10 mg montelukast co-administered with 150 mg fluconazole. The plasma concentration of montelukast was measured by high performance liquid chromatography for 24 h. RESULTS: Following clarithromycin co-administration, the area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity ( AUC(0-∞)) of montelukast increased by 144% [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.03-2.86]. The co-administration of a single oral dose of 150 and 50 mg fluconazole decreased the montelukast AUC(0-∞) by 30.7 (90% CI 0.53-0.81) and 38.8% (90% CI 0.57-0.69), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin increased the plasma concentrations of montelukast whereas fluconazole reduced the plasma concentrations of montelukast. The mechanism of the interaction is probably due to interference of the interacting drugs with transporters mediating the uptake of montelukast.