Position paper: recommendations for a digital mammography quality assurance program V4.0.

In 2001 the ACPSEM published a position paper on quality assurance in screen film mammography which was subsequently adopted as a basis for the quality assurance programs of both the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) and of BreastScreen Australia. Since then the clinical implementation of digital mammography has been realised and it has become evident that existing screen-film protocols were not appropriate to assure the required image quality needed for reliable diagnosis or to address the new dose implications resulting from digital technology. In addition, the advantages and responsibilities inherent in teleradiology are most critical in mammography and also need to be addressed. The current document is the result of a review of current overseas practice and local experience in these areas. At this time the technology of digital imaging is undergoing significant development and there is still a lack of full international consensus about some of the detailed quality control (QC) tests that should be included in quality assurance (QA) programs. This document describes the current status in digital mammography QA and recommends test procedures that may be suitable in the Australasian environment. For completeness, this document also includes a review of the QA programs required for the various types of digital biopsy units used in mammography. In the future, international harmonisation of digital quality assurance in mammography and changes in the technology may require a review of this document. Version 2.0 represented the first of these updates and key changes related to image quality evaluation, ghost image evaluation and interpretation of signal to noise ratio measurements. In Version 3.0 some significant changes, made in light of further experience gained in testing digital mammography equipment were introduced. In Version 4.0, further changes have been made, most notably digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) testing and QC have been addressed. Some additional testing for conventional projection imaging has been added in order that sites may have the capability to undertake dose surveys to confirm compliance with diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) that may be established at the National or State level. A key recommendation is that dosimetry calculations are now to be undertaken using the methodology of Dance et al. Some minor changes to existing facility QC tests have been made to ensure the suggested procedures align with those most recently adopted by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists and BreastScreen Australia. Future updates of this document may be provided as deemed necessary in electronic format on the ACPSEM's website ( https://www.acpsem.org.au/whatacpsemdoes/standards-position-papers and see also http://www.ranzcr.edu.au/quality-a-safety/radiology/practice-quality-activities/mqap ).

Technical developments in radiology in Australasia dating from 1977.

This article outlines the enormous technological advances that have taken place in the practice of radiology in Australasia in the 30 years since approximately 1977. These developments have led to significant improvements in image quality across all modalities, including even general radiography, which had as its genesis Roentgen's ground-breaking discovery of X-rays in 1895. However, nowhere has the development been more dramatic than in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This may be brought into stark reality by noting that the first MRI image of a human finger was produced in 1976 followed one year later by that of a human chest and the first MRI units were not installed in Australia and New Zealand until 1986 and 1991, respectively. The quality of these early images would be judged as laughable by today's standards where the impressive isotropic imaging that can be achieved at sub-millimetre level by both MRI and CT could not have been dreamed of 30 years ago. The review also highlights some challenges for the future of the medical physics profession.

Interim recommendations for a digital mammography quality assurance program.

In 2001 the ACPSEM published a position paper on quality assurance in screen film mammography which was subsequently adopted as a basis for the quality assurance programs of both the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) and of BreastScreen Australia. Since then the clinical implementation of digital mammography has been realised and it has become evident that existing screen-film protocols were not appropriate to assure the required image quality needed for reliable diagnosis or to address the new dose implications resulting from digital technology. In addition, the advantages and responsibilities inherent in teleradiology are most critical in mammography and also need to be addressed. The current document is the result of a review of current overseas practice and local experience in these areas. At this time the technology of digital imaging is undergoing significant development and there is still a lack of full international consensus about some of the detailed Quality Control tests that should be included in quality assurance (QA) programs. This document describes the current status in digital mammography QA and recommends test procedures that may be suitable in the Australasian environment. For completeness, this document also includes a review of the QA programs required for the various types of digital biopsy units used in mammography. In the future, international harmonisation of digital quality assurance in mammography and changes in the technology may require a review of this document. Accordingly, updates of this document will be provided as deemed necessary in electronic format on the ACPSEM's website (see http://www.acpsem.org.au/au/subgroup/radiology/RadiologySG_index.html).

Importance in optimization of multi-slice computed tomography scan protocols.

This paper reviews the reasons why multi-slice CT scanners may give patients higher dose than their single-slice predecessors and discusses the type of optimization of multi-slice scan protocols that may be undertaken to keep patient doses to acceptable levels without compromising image quality. It also provides estimates of patient effective dose values and dose length products for typical procedures and briefly discusses the implication that these dose values have for the induction of possible stochastic effects.

Patient doses in multi-slice CT and the importance of optimisation.

Substantive surveys of patient doses arising from CT examinations have been conducted in our Hospital. In the first instance doses were measured on a single-slice Siemens Plus 4 scanner. A similar survey was conducted initially following commissioning of a Siemens multi-slice Sensation scanner and subsequently after some effort was made to optimise scanning protocols. Doses are reported in terms of dose-length products (DLPs) and as effective doses. The optimisation process on the multi-slice scanner resulted in a reduction in DLP values by between 14% and 58%. With two exceptions, significantly lower or comparable DLP values were obtained when meaningful comparisons were made with results previously obtained with the single-slice scanner. Specific results for the multi-slice scanner in terms of the median DLP in mGy.cm (and median effective dose in mSv) are: routine brain, 660 (1.5); routine chest, 195 (4.0); chest with portal liver phase, 370 (7.2); routine chest with high resolution component, 250 (5.1); chest/abdomen/pelvis with contrast, 560 (11.0); routine abdomen without contrast, 145 (2.4); routine abdomen with contrast 215 (3.6); routine abdomen/pelvis without contrast, 230 (4.4); routine abdomen/pelvis with contrast, 345 (6.3); abdomen/pelvis triple phase, 715 (13.3); renal scan, 260 (4.6); lumbar spine, 445 (7.2); cerebral angiography, 240 (0.58); pulmonary angiography, 165 (3.4); aortic angiography, 305 (5.7). Based on the survey findings possible values for CT examination local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) are suggested.