ABSTRACT
Background: In pre-clinical animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can rescue motor deficits and protect susceptible neuronal populations. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative to traditional invasive cervical VNS. This is the first report summarizing the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of repeated sessions of taVNS in participants with PD. Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and possible efficacy of taVNS for motor and non-motor symptoms in mild to moderate PD. Methods: This is a double-blind, sham controlled RCT (NCT04157621) of taVNS in 30 subjects with mild to moderate PD without cognitive impairment. Participants received 10, 1-h taVNS sessions (25 Hz, 200% of sensory threshold, 500 µs pulse width, 60 s on and 30 s off) over a 2-week period. Primary outcome measures were feasibility and safety of the intervention; secondary outcomes included the MDS-UPDRS, cognitive function and self-reported symptom improvement. Results: taVNS treatment was feasible, however, daily in-office visits were reported as being burdensome for participants. While five participants in the taVNS group and three in the sham group self-reported one or more minor adverse events, no major adverse events occurred. There were no group differences on blood pressure and heart rate throughout the intervention. There were no group differences in MDS-UPDRS scores or self-reported measures. Although global cognitive scores remained stable across groups, there was a reduction in verbal fluency within the taVNS group. Conclusions: taVNS was safe, and well-tolerated in PD participants. Future studies of taVNS for PD should explore at-home stimulation devices and optimize stimulation parameters to reduce variability and maximize engagement of neural targets.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This investigation examined whether aspects of attention and executive functioning differed between Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients with freezing of gait (FOG) based on responsiveness to dopamine. We also explored association of cognition with FOG severity and gait metrics. METHODS: Fifty-four individuals with PD completed the study protocol: 17 without freezing (PDC), 23 with dopa-responsive FOG (RFOG), and 14 with dopa-unresponsive (URFOG). Standardized neuropsychological tests assessed attention (focused and sustained), psychomotor speed, and set-switching (time and errors). FOG severity was measured using the new FOG Questionnaire (nFOG-Q). Metrics from timed up and go (TUG) tasks were obtained while "on" and "off" dopamine, with and without dual cognitive tasks. RESULTS: After controlling for clinical and demographic factors, analysis of covariance revealed a significant between-group difference for set-switching errors; planned contrasts revealed increased set-switching errors in URFOG relative to RFOG and PD control groups. Groups were not different in other cognitive domains. FOG severity was modestly associated with set-switching errors in RFOG but not URFOG. TUG performances while "on" were associated with set-switching errors in PD controls, and with focused attention in RFOG. CONCLUSION: PD patients with dopa-unresponsive FOG are more prone to set-switching errors than those who respond to treatment. Furthermore, executive function appears relevant to FOG severity only in patients who show dopamine response. Together, these findings suggest disruption of a common dopamine-mediated pathway for FOG and ability to monitor rules while alternating cognitive processes. Consideration of dopa-response could be useful in characterizing cohorts and treating FOG in PD.
