Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 35
Filter
2.
J Occup Med Toxicol ; 16(1): 36, 2021 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34465347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The project "ARMIHN" (Adaptive Resiliency Management in Port) focuses on strengthening the capability to act in a mass casualty incident (MCI) due to an outbreak of infectious diseases (MCI-ID). In addition to the current threat from the COVID-19 pandemic and associated outbreaks on cruise ships, previous MCI-ID were especially caused by pathogens such as Influenza virus or Norovirus. The first step was, to get an overview of processes and resources using the example of the Port of Hamburg, and to show the associated interaction of involved parties. This will serve as a basis for developing an operational strategy and offers the opportunity to optimize current work processes. METHODS: A selective literature research using specified key words was performed and existing MCI concepts were received from local authorities. Identified structures and processes were analyzed in a multiple step process and also brought together through discussions in workshops with involved organizations and other experts. Additionally, the distances between the nearest rescue stations and selected hospitals from the Port of Hamburg were analyzed. RESULTS: The current available concepts are proven, but an adaptation to an MCI-ID shows opportunities for a further cross-organizational development. The organizational structure of an MCI-ID in the Port of Hamburg was described, including a large number of involved organizations (n = 18). There are 17 involved fire and rescue stations and the port can be reached from these locations within 6 to 35 min. Based on their specialist expertise, 14 of the 31 listed clinics were selected. CONCLUSION: The purpose of the study was to provide an analysis of the current situation and show how involved parties would cope an MCI. A description of processes and resources at the Port of Hamburg will be used when designing a management plan for responding to an MCI-ID.

3.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34456517

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A pandemic is a particular medical challenge for seafarers traveling without a physician on board. At the same time the global fight against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has to rely on resilient merchant shipping in order to maintain the flow of goods. For infection prevention and management on board, those responsible need a portfolio of protective measures that can be used on ships. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: The overview examines the question of which technical, organizational and personal protective measures can be used on a merchant ship in order to prevent or cope with COVID-19 outbreaks on board. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Guidelines, information and occupational health and safety standards from the maritime setting, but also from many other work areas, were examined in order to facilitate a variable use by those responsible (e.g. according to ship size, equipment, weather, operating status, work requirements, contact with external persons, medical problems). RESULTS: A handout was compiled that contains specific technical, organizational and personal protective measures for crews, explaining their use in a maritime context. Possible safety barriers, options to combine them and an appropriate timing are explained in a target group-oriented manner. CONCLUSION: A great variety of protective measures derived from occupational medical literature and the experience of the port medical service in Hamburg can also be implemented on the high seas. In pandemic times, merchant ships should be equipped with foresight (e.g. with rapid diagnostic tests) and those responsible should be authorized to use effective infection control measures adapted to the situation on board. Seafarers should receive priority vaccination offers regardless of their national origin.

4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34068311

ABSTRACT

The confined environment of a ship promotes the transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) due to close contact among the population on board. The study aims to provide an overview of outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 on board of cruise, navy or cargo ships, to identify relevant outbreak management techniques, related problems and to derive recommendations for prevention. Four databases were searched. The study selection included reports about seroprevalences or clinically/laboratory confirmed infections of SARS-CoV-2 on board ships between the first of January, 2020 and the end of July, 2020. A total of 37 studies were included of whom 33 reported outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 on cruise ships (27 studies referred to the Diamond Princess). Two studies considered outbreaks on the Grand Princess, three studies informed about Nile River cruises and one study about the MS Westerdam (mention of multiple outbreaks possible in one study). Additionally, three studies reported outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 on navy vessels and one study referred to a cargo ship. Problems in handling outbreaks resulted from a high number of asymptomatic infections, transportation issues, challenges in communication or limited access to health care. Responsible operators need to implement infection control measures which should be described in outbreak management plans for ships to prevent transmission risks, including, e.g., education, testing strategies, communication lines, social distancing and hygiene regulations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ships , Disease Outbreaks , Government Agencies , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
5.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 174, 2020 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32131766

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The European Guidelines for breast cancer screening suggest that the impact of population-based mammography screening programmes (MSP) may be assessed using the relative reduction in the incidence of advanced breast cancer (ABC, that is, stage UICC II and higher) as a surrogate indicator of screening effectiveness. METHODS: This prospective, population register-based study contained individual data of 1,200,246 women (aged 50-69 years) who attended the initial prevalence screening between 2005 and 2009. Of them, 498,029 women returned for the regular (i.e., within 24 months) first subsequent, and 208,561 for the regular second subsequent incidence screenings. The incidence rate of ABC was calculated for the 24-months period following, but not including, the initial screening by incorporating all interval ABCs and all ABCs detected at the regular first incidence screening; the ABC rate for the second 24-months period was determined in the same way, including ABCs detected in the interval after the first and, respectively, at the second incidence screening. The relative reduction in the ABC incidence was derived by comparing the age-standardized rates in these two periods with an age-standardized reference incidence rate, observed in the target population before the MSP implementation. The strengths and weaknesses of this particular study design were contrasted with a recently published checklist of main methodological problems affecting studies of the effect of MSP on ABC incidence. RESULTS: The age-standardized ABC incidence rate was 291.6 per 100,000 women for the 24-months period subsequent to the initial screening, and 275.0/100,000 for the 24-months period following the first subsequent screening. Compared to the 2-year incidence of 349.4/100,000 before the start of the MSP, this amounted to a relative reduction of 16.5 and 21.3%, respectively, in the incidence of ABC among regular MSP participants. CONCLUSIONS: The design employed in this study avoids some of the substantial methodological limitations that compromised previous observational studies. Nevertheless, specific limitations prevail that demand a cautious interpretation of the results. Therefore, the study findings, indicating a reduction in ABC for regular MSP participants, need to be followed with respect to potential impacts on breast cancer mortality rates.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Mammography/methods , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prospective Studies , Registries
6.
Radiology ; 286(2): 424-432, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29106821

ABSTRACT

Purpose To compare detection rates of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), classified according to nuclear grade, between the prevalence round (baseline screening) and two subsequent screening rounds of a population-based digital mammography screening program, to assess differences over time. Materials and Methods The cancer registry provided data for 1970 graded pure DCIS cases from 16 screening regions of the prevalence round (baseline screening, from 2005 to 2008), first subsequent round, and second subsequent round; the interval between all screening rounds was 22-30 months. Age-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the grade-specific detection rates between the prevalence round (reference) and subsequent screening rounds. Results Over all screening rounds, cancer detection rates were lowest for low-grade DCIS (range, 0.11 [58 of 508 817 patients] to 0.25 [178 of 713 867 patients] per 1000 women screened) and highest for high-grade DCIS (range, 0.53[271 of 508 817 patients] to 0.59 [237 of 398 944 patients] per 1000 women screened). Detection rates for low-grade DCIS were significantly lower in the first (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, P < .001) and second (OR = 0.57, P < .001) subsequent screening rounds compared with that in the prevalence round; the relative reduction of detection rates of intermediate-grade DCIS was less pronounced (OR = 0.79, P = .006 and OR = 0.76, P = .003, respectively). Conversely, the detection rate of high-grade DCIS remained at the high level found in the prevalence screening (OR = 0.89, P = .143 and OR = 0.97, P = .700, respectively). Conclusion The findings demonstrate persistently high detection rates of high-grade DCIS in two consecutive subsequent screening rounds compared with the prevalence round; conversely, rates of low-grade DCIS and, less markedly, intermediate-grade DCIS decreased in subsequent rounds. Grade-related changes of DCIS detection are suggestive of distinct dynamics of lesion progression. © RSNA, 2017 An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on November 10, 2017.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/prevention & control , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/prevention & control , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Calcinosis/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Disease Progression , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Female , Humans , Mammography/standards , Mass Screening/standards , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
7.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 24(1): 84-91, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27587188

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Regular exercise lowers the risk of cardiovascular death in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. We aimed to investigate regular exercise behaviour and intention in relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression in CHD patients across Europe. DESIGN: This study was based on a multicentre cross-sectional survey. METHODS: In the EUROpean Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE) III survey, 8966 CHD patients <80 years of age from 22 European countries were interviewed on average 15 months after hospitalisation. Whether patients exercised or intended to exercise regularly was assessed using the Stages of Change questionnaire in 8330 patients. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Total physical activity was measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in patients from a subset of 14 countries. RESULTS: Overall, 50.3% of patients were not intending to exercise regularly, 15.9% were intending to exercise regularly, and 33.8% were exercising regularly. Patients with severe symptoms of depression less frequently exercised regularly than patients with symptoms in the normal range (20.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14.8-26.8 vs 36.7%, 95% CI 29.8-44.2). Among patients not exercising regularly, patients with severe symptoms of depression were less likely to have an intention to exercise regularly (odds ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.85). Symptoms of anxiety did not affect regular exercise intention. In sensitivity analysis, results were consistent when adjusting for total physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Lower frequency of regular exercise and decreased likelihood of exercise intention were observed in CHD patients with severe depressive symptoms. Severe symptoms of depression may preclude CHD patients from performing regular exercise.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , Cardiac Rehabilitation/methods , Coronary Disease/rehabilitation , Depression/psychology , Exercise Therapy , Health Behavior , Intention , Self Care , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/physiopathology , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Disease/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/physiopathology , Europe , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Surveys , Humans , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Primary Prevention , Retrospective Studies , Secondary Prevention , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 44: 44-51, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27470937

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mammography screening programs (MSPs) aim to detect early-stage breast cancers in order to decrease the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancers and to reduce breast cancer mortality. We analyzed the time trends of advanced-stage breast cancer incidence rates in the target population before and after implementation of the MSP in a region of northwestern Germany. METHODS: The MSP in the Münster district started in October 2005. A total of 13,874 women with an incident invasive breast cancer (BC) was identified by the population-based epidemiological cancer registry between 2000 and 2013 in the target group 50-69 years. Multiple imputation methods were used to replace missing data on tumor stages (10.4%). The incidence rates for early-stage (UICC I) and advanced-stage (UICC II+) BC were determined, and Poisson regression analyses were performed to assess trends over time. RESULTS: The incidence rates for UICC I breast cancers increased during the step-up introduction of the MSP and remained elevated thereafter. By contrast, after increasing from 2006 to 2008, the incidence rates of UICC II+ breast cancers decreased to levels below the pre-screening period. Significantly decreasing UICC II+ incidence rates were limited to the age group 55-69 years and reached levels that were significantly lower than incidence rates in the pre-screening period. DISCUSSION: The incidence rates of advanced-stage breast cancers decreased in the age groups from 55 years to the upper age limit for screening eligibility, but not in the adjacent age groups. The findings are consistent with MSP lead time effects and seem to indicate that the MSP lowers advanced-stage breast cancer rates in the target population.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/methods , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Germany , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged
9.
Radiology ; 278(3): 707-13, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26505802

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between age at screening and detection rates for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) separately for different nuclear grades after introduction of a population-based digital mammography screening program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study was approved by the ethics board and did not require informed consent. In 733 905 women aged 50-69 years who participated in a screening program for the first time in 2005-2008 (baseline examinations were performed with digital mammography), DCIS detection rates were determined for 5-year age groups (detection rates per 1000 women screened) to distinguish high-, intermediate-, and low-grade DCIS. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare detection rates between age groups by adjusting for screening units (P < .05). RESULTS: There were 989 graded DCIS diagnoses among 733 905 women (detection rate, 1.35‰): 419 diagnoses of high-grade DCIS (detection rate, 0.57‰), 388 diagnoses of intermediate-grade DCIS (detection rate, 0.53‰), and 182 diagnoses of low-grade DCIS (detection rate, 0.25‰). Detection rate for types of DCIS combined increased significantly across age groups (50-54 years, detection rate of 1.15‰ [254 of 220 985 women]; 55-59 years, detection rate of 1.23‰ [218 of 177 782 women]; 60-64 years, detection rate of 1.34‰ [201 of 150 415 women]; and 65-69 years, detection rate of 1.71‰ [316 of 184 723 women]; P < .001). Of note, the detection rate for high-grade DCIS showed a significant increase with age (odds ratio, 1.18 per 5-year age group; P < .0001). The increase was lower for intermediate-grade DCIS (odds ratio, 1.11; P = .016) and not significant for low-grade DCIS (P = .10). CONCLUSION: Total DCIS detection rates increase with age, mostly because of an increase in high- and intermediate-grade DCIS, which are precursor lesions that carry a higher risk for transition to more aggressive invasive breast cancer than low-grade DCIS.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/methods , Mass Screening , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/epidemiology , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Registries , Retrospective Studies
11.
Breast ; 24(3): 191-6, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25687106

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Program sensitivity (PS), i.e., the ratio of screen-detected cancers divided by the sum of screen-detected plus interval cancers, is a major outcome in population-based mammography screening programs (MSP). This study evaluated PS within the digital MSP in Germany focussing on the impact of age and histological subtype. METHODS: Data of 838,579 first-time participants aged 50-69 years who were screened in 2005-2008 were linked with cancer registry data from Germany's most populous state, North Rhine-Westphalia. Invasive breast cancers and ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) were detected either at screening or during the 24 month post-screening interval. PS was evaluated with respect to age at screening, in-situ or invasive cancer and histological characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 6767 cancers were detected at screening and 1884 cancers were diagnosed during the post-screening interval. The overall PS amounted to 78.2% and increased from 72.1% at age 50-54 years to 82.4% at age 65-69 years (p for trend <0.0001). PS was higher for non-lobular (79.1%) than lobular carcinomas (72.1%, p < 0.0001). The highest PS was observed in DCIS across all ages (>90%), while PS was lowest among participants aged 50-54 years with invasive breast cancer (67.7%), particularly among those with lobular subtype (62.8%). Interval cancers showed generally more advanced tumour stages. CONCLUSIONS: While overall PS was high, differences across subgroups indicated that youngest screening participants are at higher risk of interval cancer. Age-adapted recall and assessment strategies in younger participants may need to be considered to improve PS in younger women.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Lobular/diagnostic imaging , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Program Evaluation/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Lobular/epidemiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Mammography/methods , Middle Aged , Registries , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 22(10): 1354-62, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25139770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous cross-sectional surveys in different European countries within the EUROASPIRE programme demonstrated a high prevalence of modifiable risk factors, unhealthy lifestyles and inadequate drug treatment in coronary heart disease patients. Comparable data for ischaemic stroke patients is lacking. METHODS: A stroke-specific study module was added to the EUROASPIRE III core survey. This cross-sectional multicentre survey included consecutive patients with first-ever ischaemic stroke from four European countries. Data were obtained from medical records, patient interviews and patient examinations within 6-36 months after the stroke event. Control of modifiable risk factors after stroke was evaluated against contemporary European guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 881 patients was recruited. Median age was 66 years, 37.5% were female; average time from the stroke event to interview was 550 days. At the time of the interview, 17.6% of stroke patients smoked cigarettes, 35.5% had a body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2), 62.4% showed elevated blood pressure and 75.7% exhibited elevated LDL cholesterol levels. Antiplatelet drugs or oral anticoagulants were used by 87.2%, antihypertensive medication by 84.4% and statins by 56.8% of stroke patients. Among patients using antihypertensive drugs and lipid-lowering medication at the time of the interview, 34.3% and 34.4%, respectively, achieved target blood pressure and total cholesterol values according to current European guidelines. CONCLUSION: The EUROASPIRE III stroke-specific module shows that secondary prevention and risk factor control in patients after ischaemic stroke need to be improved in four European centres at the time of the study since about half of patients are not achieving risk factor targets defined in European guidelines.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , Brain Ischemia/therapy , Secondary Prevention/methods , Stroke/therapy , Aged , Brain Ischemia/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Guideline Adherence , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prevalence , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Risk Reduction Behavior , Secondary Prevention/standards , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking Cessation , Smoking Prevention , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Weight Loss
13.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 22(9): 1212-9, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25516535

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Readiness for smoking cessation is an important predictor of quit attempts and cessation success. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and correlates of readiness for smoking cessation in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. DESIGN: The EUROpean Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events III (EUROASPIRE III) survey is a cross-sectional study conducted in 2006-2007 among CHD patients <80 years of age from 22 European regions. METHODS: Patients were interviewed on average 15 months after hospital admission for an acute coronary event or procedure. Readiness for smoking cessation was assessed using the smoking stages of change (SSC) short form questionnaire. Breath carbon monoxide was measured to validate self-reported non-smoking. RESULTS: Among 2585 patients who were smoking prior to hospital admission, 25.6%, 16.8%, 8.1%, 5.6% and 44.0% were in the precontemplation (no intention to quit), contemplation (thinking of quitting), preparation (planning to quit), action (having quit within six months) and maintenance (having quit more than six months ago) stages, respectively. Significant multivariable correlates of advancement in SSC showed positive associations of older age and attended cardiac rehabilitation and negative associations of severe depressive symptoms, longer smoking duration and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure. CONCLUSIONS: One-quarter of CHD patients across Europe who were smoking prior to hospitalisation have no intention to quit, and an additional quarter is thinking of quitting or planning to quit. Patients who are younger, do not attend cardiac rehabilitation, have severe depressive symptoms, have been smoking for longer periods of time and are exposed to ETS may need to be specifically targeted in cessation interventions.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/rehabilitation , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Compliance , Risk Reduction Behavior , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking Prevention , Age Factors , Aged , Breath Tests , Carbon Monoxide/analysis , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Disease/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Intention , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
14.
Eur Heart J ; 35(9): 590-8, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24334711

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Passive smoking is the inhalation of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). We aimed to describe the frequency of passive smoking among patients with CHD and to investigate the association between ETS exposure and smoking cessation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The EUROASPIRE III survey was conducted in 2006-07 among CHD patients up to 80 years of age from 22 European regions. Patients were interviewed and examined on average 15 months after hospital admission for CHD. Information was obtained on smoking prior to hospital admission, smoking at interview, and ETS exposure at home, at work, and at other locations. Breath carbon monoxide was measured to validate self-reported non-smoking. Among 8729 patients, 6060 (69.4%) were non-smokers prior to hospital admission, of whom 10.3% reported ETS exposure at home, 7.2% at work, and 13.8% at other locations. Overall, 24.2% of non-smokers were exposed to ETS at any place. Among the 2669 patients who were smoking prior to hospital admission, the likelihood of cessation at interview was lower in those with ETS exposure at home than in those without [25.3 vs. 58.1%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.33]. This finding applied also to ETS exposure at work (32.2 vs. 52.7%; adjusted OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.76) and at other locations (38.0 vs. 52.8%; adjusted OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.84). CONCLUSION: A noteworthy proportion of non-smokers with CHD are exposed to ETS. Passive smoking may jeopardize smoking cessation among CHD patients.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
15.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 20(2): 331-40, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22396247

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients: (1) differences in the prevalence of depression and anxiety between samples selected from 22 countries; (2) the association of depression and anxiety with age, education, diagnostic category, favourable behaviours, use of cardioprotective drugs, and reaching the secondary prevention treatment targets. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study group consisted of 8580 patients from 22 European countries examined at least 6 months after hospitalization due to CHD. Depression and anxiety were assessed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Prevalence of depression (HADS depression score ≥ 8) varied from 8.2% to 35.7% in men and from 10.3% to 62.5% in women. Prevalence of anxiety (HADS anxiety score ≥ 8) varied from 12.0% to 41.8% in men and from 21.5% to 63.7% in women. Older age, female sex, low education, and no history of invasive treatment were associated with more frequent depression and anxiety. Depression and anxiety were associated with less frequent modification of lifestyle. Depression was related with body mass index, waist circumference, fasting glucose, and more frequent self-reported diabetes but not with reaching the treatment targets for blood pressure and lipids. CONCLUSIONS: High prevalence of depression and anxiety in CHD patients, and relation with less frequent lifestyle modification, call to integrate methods of identification and minimizing unfavourable effects of depression and anxiety into the cardiac rehabilitation and prevention programmes.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Coronary Disease/therapy , Depression/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/psychology , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Chi-Square Distribution , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Disease/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/psychology , Educational Status , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Health Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Risk Reduction Behavior , Secondary Prevention , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
16.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 109(17): 303-10, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22611443

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Target values for cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) are stated in guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. We studied secular trends in risk factors over a 12-year period among CHD patients in the region of Münster, Germany. METHODS: The cross-sectional EUROASPIRE I, II and III surveys were performed in multiple centers across Europe. For all three, the Münster region was the participating German region. In the three periods 1995/96, 1999/2000, and 2006/07, the surveys included (respectively) 392, 402 and 457 ≤ 70-year-old patients with CHD in Münster who had sustained a coronary event at least 6 months earlier. RESULTS: The prevalence of smoking remained unchanged, with 16.8% in EUROASPIRE I and II and 18.4% in EUROASPIRE III (p=0.898). On the other hand, high blood pressure and high cholesterol both became less common across the three EUROASPIRE studies (60.7% to 69.4% to 55.3%, and 94.3% to 83.4% to 48.1%, respectively; p<0.001 for both). Obesity became more common (23.0% to 30.6% to 43.1%, p<0.001), as did treatment with antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs (80.4% to 88.6% to 94.3%, and 35.0% to 67.4% to 87.0%, respectively; p<0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: The observed trends in cardiovascular risk factors under-score the vital need for better preventive strategies in patients with CHD.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Forecasting , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/trends
18.
J Hypertens ; 29(8): 1641-8, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21720270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure management is a key issue among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The present study aimed to identify particular patient groups that may need to be specifically targeted in secondary prevention of CHD. METHODS: EUROASPIRE III is a cross-sectional study conducted in 2006-2007 among patients up to 80 years of age hospitalized for CHD. Patients from 76 centres in 22 European regions were examined on average 15 months after hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate factors associated with blood pressure control and knowledge of target blood pressure using the cut-point of less than 140/90 mmHg. RESULTS: Among 7649 patients using antihypertensive medication 50.4% achieved blood pressure control and 49.4% provided accurate knowledge of target blood pressure. Obese patients were less likely to show controlled blood pressure [odds ratio (OR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.80] and accurate knowledge of blood pressure target values (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.90). Dyslipidaemia was negatively associated with blood pressure control and accurate target knowledge. Patients with diabetes mellitus less frequently achieved blood pressure control (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-0.99). Accurate knowledge of target blood pressure was positively related to blood pressure control (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.24). Patients who received advice by a health professional to reduce salt intake, to reduce weight, and to increase physical activity more frequently showed accurate knowledge of blood pressure target values. CONCLUSION: Blood pressure control and knowledge of target blood pressure are inappropriate in the European high-risk population of coronary patients. Particularly CHD patients with obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia need better management and control of elevated blood pressure.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/physiology , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Surveys , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Communication , Comorbidity , Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Disease/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe , Female , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Physician-Patient Relations , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
19.
Heart ; 96(21): 1744-9, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20956490

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare gender-related lifestyle changes and risk factor management after hospitalisation for a coronary event or revascularisation intervention in Europe. METHOD: The EUROASPIRE III survey was carried out in 22 European countries in 2006-2007. Consecutive patients having had a coronary event or revascularisation before the age of 80 were identified. A total of 8966 patients (25.3% women) were interviewed and underwent clinical and biochemical tests at least 6 months after hospital admission. Trends in cardiovascular risk management were assessed on the basis of the 1994-1995, 1999-2000 and 2006-2007 EUROASPIRE surveys. RESULTS: Female survey participants were generally older and had a lower educational level than male participants (p<0.0001). The prevalences of obesity (p<0.0001), high blood pressure (BP) (p=0.001), elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (p<0.0001) and diabetes (p<0.0001) were significantly higher in women than in men, whereas current smoking (p<0.0001) was significantly more common in men. The use of antihypertensive and antidiabetic drugs (but not that of other drugs) was more common in women than in men. However, BP (p<0.0001), LDL-cholesterol (p<0.0001) and HbA1c (p<0.0001) targets were less often achieved in women than in men. Between 1994 and 2007, cholesterol control improved less in women than in men (interaction: p=0.009), whereas trends in BP control (p=0.32) and glycaemia (p=0.36) were similar for both genders. CONCLUSION: The EUROASPIRE III results show that despite similarities in medication exposure, women are less likely than men to achieve BP, LDL-cholesterol and HbA1c targets after a coronary event. This gap did not appear to narrow between 1994 and 2007.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Sex Factors , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Coronary Disease/complications , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Disease/therapy , Diabetes Complications/drug therapy , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Educational Status , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/complications , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Hypercholesterolemia/therapy , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/therapy , Risk Factors , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
20.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil ; 17(4): 447-54, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20485181

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Several studies have reported increasing obesity rates in the general population. Using data from the EUROASPIRE III survey, we investigated as to what extent the obesity epidemic affects the high priority group of coronary heart disease patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 8924 patients, who had experienced a recent coronary acute event, from 22 countries in Europe participating in the EUROASPIRE III study were gathered in 2006-2007. Eight centres had also participated in the earlier two EUROASPIRE surveys carried out in 1994-1995 and 1999-2000. In these eight centres, obesity prevalence in coronary patients had increased from 25 to 38% during the past decade. The most recent survey shows that obesity is more prevalent in women (45 vs. 32% in men) and is a major health problem across all the 22 countries. Only 18% of all the patients were found to reach a body mass index below 25 kg/m whereas 53% were diagnosed with central obesity. Since their hospital discharge, only half of the obese patients reported to have followed the dietary recommendations and 48% reported engagement in more physical activity. Only 13% of the patients who were overweight at the time of the coronary event reached the target of >or=5% weight loss whereas 21% of them presented with a weight gain of 5% or more. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of obesity is still increasing and reaching epidemic proportions in the high priority group of coronary patients all over Europe. Patients' awareness and current management of obesity seems inadequate. More intensive programs focusing on diet and especially physical activity are urgently required.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/therapy , Energy Intake , Exercise Therapy , Obesity/therapy , Overweight/therapy , Risk Reduction Behavior , Weight Loss , Aged , Body Mass Index , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Health Behavior , Health Care Surveys , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/diet therapy , Obesity/epidemiology , Overweight/diet therapy , Overweight/epidemiology , Patient Compliance , Patient Education as Topic , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...