Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Neuroradiol ; 33(2): 405-414, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36264354

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion (iPCAO) represent up to 6% of all acute ischemic stroke patients. Acute revascularization therapies for these patients were not tested in randomized controlled trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of iPCAO patients who undergo endovascular treatment (EVT). METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, Scopus (inception-03/2022) was conducted for studies reporting 3­month outcome, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and/or successful recanalization in iPCAO patients who underwent EVT. Random effect meta-analyses for pooled proportions were calculated. Double-arm meta-analyses for comparison of outcomes of iPCAO patients treated with EVT with age-, sex- and NIHSS-matched iPCAO patients treated with best medical treatment only were performed. RESULTS: Fifteen studies reporting a total of 461 iPCAO patients who underwent EVT were included. Excellent and favorable 3­month outcome proportions were 36% (95% confidence interval, CI 20-51%) and 57% (95% CI 40-73%), respectively. The 3­month mortality was 9% (95% CI 5-13), sICH occurred in 1% (95% CI 0-2%), successful recanalization was achieved in 79% (95% CI 71-86%). No significant differences in favorable and excellent 3­month outcomes, 3­month mortality and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were found between the groups of patients who underwent EVT and the group of patients who received best medical treatment only. CONCLUSION: These results support the feasibility and safety of EVT in iPCAO, but do not show an outcome benefit with EVT compared to best medical treatment. Randomized trials are needed to evaluate treatment benefit of EVT in these patients.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Endovascular Procedures , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Humans , Stroke/therapy , Brain Ischemia/therapy , Thrombectomy/methods , Ischemic Stroke/etiology , Posterior Cerebral Artery , Treatment Outcome , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Intracranial Hemorrhages/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Muscle Nerve ; 66(3): 329-335, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35765722

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Ultrasonography of the cranial nerves has recently gained attention for assessment of inflammatory, compressive, or degenerative neuropathies. However, sonographic reference values of cranial nerves have received less attention than those of peripheral nerves. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to provide current evidence of sonographic reference values for cranial nerve size. METHODS: By searching Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that reported ultrasound measurements of the facial, spinal accessory, and hypoglossal nerves in healthy adults. We included studies that reported either the sonographic cross-sectional area (CSA) or the nerve diameter; the included nerves were subgrouped according to the site of nerve measurement. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with a total of 661 participants and 1437 ultrasound nerve measurements met the inclusion criteria. The anatomical sites for each nerve were combined to provide single-nerve mean measurements. We found an overall mean nerve diameter of 0.80 mm for the facial nerve, 0.63 mm for the spinal accessory nerve, and 1.82 mm2 for hypoglossal nerve CSA. DISCUSSION: This meta-analysis provides reference values for the diameter and cross-sectional area of the facial, spinal accessory, and hypoglossal nerves at different sites, which can be used as guidance in clinical practice to detect pathological changes in cranial nerve size in cranial neuropathies. We recommend further validation in large-scale studies as well as standardization of the scanning protocols.


Subject(s)
Accessory Nerve , Peripheral Nerves , Adult , Humans , Hypoglossal Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Nerves/diagnostic imaging , Reference Values , Ultrasonography
3.
Cells ; 11(4)2022 02 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35203250

ABSTRACT

Inclusion body myositis (IBM) is a slowly progressive muscle weakness of distal and proximal muscles, which is diagnosed by clinical and histopathological criteria. Imaging biomarkers are inconsistently used and do not follow international standardized criteria. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic value of muscle ultrasound (US) in IBM compared to healthy controls. A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science was performed. Articles reporting the use of muscle ultrasound in IBM, and published in peer-reviewed journals until 11 September 2021, were included in our study. Seven studies were included, with a total of 108 IBM and 171 healthy controls. Echogenicity between IBM and healthy controls, which was assessed by three studies, demonstrated a significant mean difference in the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) muscle, which had a grey scale value (GSV) of 36.55 (95% CI, 28.65-44.45, p < 0.001), and in the gastrocnemius (GC), which had a GSV of 27.90 (95% CI 16.32-39.48, p < 0.001). Muscle thickness in the FDP showed no significant difference between the groups. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US in the differentiation between IBM and the controls were 82% and 98%, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.612. IBM is a rare disease, which is reflected in the low numbers of patients included in each of the studies and thus there was high heterogeneity in the results. Nevertheless, the selected studies conclusively demonstrated significant differences in echogenicity of the FDP and GC in IBM, compared to controls. Further high-quality studies, using standardized operating procedures, are needed to implement muscle ultrasound in the diagnostic criteria.


Subject(s)
Myositis, Inclusion Body , Forearm/diagnostic imaging , Forearm/pathology , Humans , Muscle Weakness , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Myositis, Inclusion Body/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...