Hepatitis C virus transmission in a Dutch haemodialysis unit: detailed outbreak investigation using NS5A gene sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis is a risk factor for hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission. Two patients receiving haemodialysis in a Dutch dialysis unit in The Hague were found to seroconvert to HCV in December 2016 after the yearly routine control for blood-borne viruses. Following the presumed time of infection, three chronically infected HCV patients were identified as possible index cases. AIM: To confirm inter-patient transmission and to identify the source. METHODS: Molecular investigation and review of medical records were performed. FINDINGS: Both of the incident cases and one of the three possible index cases were demonstrated to be infected with HCV genotype 2b based on 5'UTR sequencing. Epidemiological relatedness between these viruses was further investigated by sequencing of the NS5A region. Phylogenetic analysis clearly identified the incident cases and the index case to represent a cluster distinct from unrelated controls with HCV genotype 2b. Detailed review of the medical records identified two possible incidents that might have resulted in the HCV transmission cases: contamination of the venous pressure-sensing port due to high venous pressures or incomplete compliance with infection control precautions of the unit staff during handling of two incidents, that occurred at the same time in a single haemodialysis session with the index patient as well as both incident cases present. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that detailed incident recording in combination with state-of-the-art molecular investigations such as sequencing of the NS5A region resulted in unravelling a set of two HCV transmissions that occurred at a haemodialysis unit.

Enterococcal surface protein contributes to persistence in the host but is not a target of opsonic and protective antibodies in Enterococcus faecium infection.

Enterococci are important nosocomial pathogens with multiple intrinsic and acquired resistances to antibiotics. In the past, the majority of infections were caused by Enterococcus faecalis; however, an increase in Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates has been observed in recent years. The enterococcal surface protein (Esp) is expressed on the surface of most E. faecium clinical isolates and has been shown to be involved in biofilm formation. Here, E. faecium E1162 and its previously created insertion-deletion mutant of the esp gene, E. faecium E1162Deltaesp, were compared in a mouse bacteraemia model. Anti-Esp serum was tested for its capacity to mediate opsonophagocytic killing of E1162 in vitro and to protect against E. faecium bacteraemia. The inactivation of esp attenuated E. faecium virulence with reduced numbers of bacteria recovered from the kidneys in animals infected with the mutant compared to the wild-type strain (P=0.035). Passive immunization with rabbit polyclonal serum raised against the recombinant N-terminal Esp protein did not protect mice against E. faecium bacteraemia (P>0.05). In contrast, mice passively immunized with polyclonal antiserum raised against lipoteichoic acid (LTA) from E. faecalis had lower numbers of E. faecium E1162 in the blood compared to mice immunized with normal rabbit serum. These results suggest that Esp contributes to E. faecium persistence in the host. However, in contrast to LTA, Esp does not seem to be a target for protective antibodies in E. faecium strain E1162 in mouse bacteraemia.

Pathogenesis and immunity in enterococcal infections.

Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium have emerged as multi-resistant nosocomial pathogens in immunocompromised and critically ill patients. Multi-resistant strains have acquired virulence genes resulting in hospital-adapted clones. The following review summarizes several proteins and carbohydrate- or glycoconjugates that have been identified as putative virulence factors involved in the pathogenesis of enterococcal infections and may be used as targets for alternative therapies. Several studies describing the host immune response against enterococci are also summarized.

Comparison of genotypic and phenotypic methods for species-level identification of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

To compare commonly used phenotypic methods with genotypic identification methods 47 clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS), 10 CONS ATCC strains, and a Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolate were identified using the API Staph ID test, BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System, and 16S rRNA gene and tuf gene sequencing. When necessary part of the sodA gene was sequenced for definitive identification. The results show that tuf gene sequencing is the best method for identification of CONS, but the API Staph ID test is a reasonably reliable phenotypic alternative. The performance of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for identification of CONS is poor. The present study also showed that although genotypic methods are clearly superior to phenotypic identifications, a drawback of sequence-based genotypic methods may be a lack of quality of deposited sequences in data banks. In particular, 16S rRNA gene sequencing suffers from the lack of high quality among sequences deposited in GenBank. Furthermore, genotypic identification based on 16S rRNA sequences has limited discriminating power for closely related Staphylococcus species. We propose partial sequencing of the tuf gene as a reliable and reproducible method for identification of CONS species.