Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 15(3): e0230413, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32187221

ABSTRACT

Prospective studies are key study designs when attempting to unravel health mechanisms that are widely applicable. Understanding the internal validity of a prospective study is essential to judge a study's quality. Moreover, insights in possible sampling bias and the external validity of a prospective study are useful to judge the applicability of a study's findings. We evaluated participation, retention, and associated factors of women in a multicenter prospective cohort (FemCure) to understand the study's validity.Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infected adult women, negative for HIV, syphilis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae were eligible to be preselected and included at three sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics in the Netherlands (2016-2017). The planned follow-up for participants was 3 months, with two weekly rectal and vaginal CT self-sampling and online questionnaires administered at home and at the clinic. We calculated the proportions of preselected, included, and retained (completed follow-up) women. Associations with non-preselection, noninclusion, and non-retention (called attrition) were assessed (logistic and Cox regression).Among the 4,916 women, 1,763 (35.9%) were preselected, of whom 560 (31.8%) were included. The study population had diverse baseline characteristics: study site, migration background, high education, and no STI history were associated with non-preselection and noninclusion. Retention was 76.3% (n = 427). Attrition was 10.71/100 person/month (95% confidence interval 9.97, 12.69) and was associated with young age and low education. In an outpatient clinical setting, it proved feasible to include and retain women in an intensive prospective cohort. External validity was limited as the study population was not representative (sampling bias), but this did not affect the internal validity. Selective attrition, however (potential selection bias), should be accounted for when interpreting the study results.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia trachomatis/pathogenicity , Adolescent , Adult , Chlamydia Infections/mortality , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 32(7): 851-856, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31688310

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Many individuals previously diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are likely to be lost to medical follow-up and, therefore, remain untreated despite new highly effective drug treatment, direct acting antivirals. We aim to identify and retrieve these chronic HCV-infected individuals to re-evaluate them and offer treatment. METHODS: Possible chronic HCV infections were identified from test results of the medical microbiological laboratory, notifications to the public health service, and the hospital registries over the past 15 years were checked in South Limburg, the Netherlands. Individuals were contacted based on the physician-patient relationship of the gastroenterologist or microbiologist (retrieval). Individuals were informed about the new treatment options, offered an HCV-RNA test, and if still positive, referred to the gastroenterologist for treatment (re-evaluation). RESULTS: In total, 689 individuals with a positive anti-HCV test in the past were identified, 308 (45%) were eligible for retrieval, 90 (29%) of them were retrieved, 34 (38%) of those retrieved were re-evaluated, 19 (56%) of those tested were HCV-RNA positive, and 12 (63%) of these individuals were offered treatment. CONCLUSION: During every step of the retrieval chain, many patients were lost. Nevertheless, with substantial effort, we were able to identify, retrieve, and positively re-evaluate a limited number of individuals with a possible chronic HCV infection who were lost to medical follow-up (19 patients). With this case-finding approach, we were able to prevent potential severe complications in these patients and contribute to a small step in the eradication of HCV in the Netherlands.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Humans , Mass Screening , Netherlands/epidemiology
3.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 25(4): 214-219, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31407603

ABSTRACT

Background: Pertussis testing is most important when transmission to vulnerable groups is likely. Patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of pertussis are prevalent in primary care, yet general practitioners' (GPs) reasons (not) to test for pertussis are largely unknown.Objectives: To evaluate GP-reported diagnostic practices for pertussis, reasons for (not) testing and intentions towards testing among GPs.Methods: A total of 594 Dutch GPs were invited by email to participate in a survey study including a questionnaire reflecting on their pertussis diagnostic practices, reasons for (not) testing and the intention to test for pertussis in the year of 2013. Intention to test was measured as the likelihood to test for eight clinical vignettes.Results: In total, 122 GPs (21%) completed the online questionnaire. Most GPs reported having diagnosed at least one pertussis case (84%) in the previous year. Of all GPs, 14% did not perform any pertussis tests in the last year. The most reported reason for testing was to confirm the clinical pertussis diagnosis (70%); the most reported reason for not testing was that the diagnostic test result does not influence treatment (70%). Overall, judging from the clinical vignettes, GPs reported being more likely to perform diagnostic testing based on symptoms than based on vulnerable groups at risk.Conclusion: In contrast to national guidelines, our results suggest that GPs report to test for pertussis mainly based on clinical symptoms rather than based on protecting vulnerable groups at risk.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Whooping Cough/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Intention , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands
4.
Ann Fam Med ; 16(1): 21-27, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29311171

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Both chronic hepatitis C (HCV) and B virus (HBV) infections are generally asymptomatic, and many remain undetected or are diagnosed at a late stage. Studies that evaluate best practice hepatitis testing strategies are needed to better detect this hidden population. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic yield (test uptake and rate of positive test results) of a combined public health and primary care birth cohort testing strategy in detecting hidden cases of HCV and HBV infections. We invited all patients aged between 40 and 70 years (n = 6,743) registered with 11 family practices serving 2 higher prevalence areas, or hotspots (ie, estimated HCV prevalence of 1%; national estimated prevalence is 0.1-0.4%), in the south of the Netherlands. RESULTS: Test uptake was 50.9% (n = 3,434 patients). No active or chronic HCV infection was detected: 0.00% (95% CI, 0.00%-0.11%). Positive test rates were 0.20% (95% CI, 0.08%-0.42%) for anti-HCV (n = 7), 0.26% (95% CI, 0.12%-0.50%) for hepatitis B surface antigen (n = 9), and 4.14% (95% CI, 3.49%-4.86%) for antihepatitis B core (n = 142). CONCLUSIONS: This best practice testing strategy was effective in achieving a high test uptake. It completely failed, however, to detect hidden chronic HCV infections and is not recommended for countries with a low prevalence of the disease.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B, Chronic/epidemiology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis C, Chronic/diagnosis , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Prospective Studies , Public Health
5.
PLoS One ; 13(1): e0191798, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29370254

ABSTRACT

Transmission routes of the hepatitis E virus (HEV) are under debate. Here, we studied possible sexual transmission by comparing HEV prevalence in a Dutch sexual high-risk population (n = 1,482) with that in a general population (n = 1,487) while assessing sociodemographic and sexual risk factors. Overall prevalence of anti-HEV IgG of 18.9% (n = 562) was, adjusting for confounders, similar between the two populations (p = 0.44). Prevalence was higher with each year's increase in age (adjusted OR: 1.03, 95%CI: 1.02-1.04, p<0.01), among men (adjusted OR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.02-1.50, p = 0.03) and among individuals diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections (adjusted OR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.02-2.49, p = 0.04). Our results only hint at the possibility of a sexual transmission route for HEV given higher rates in those with chlamydia and/or gonorrheal infections. Sexual transmission is not a dominant transmission route, as its prevalence was not higher for the sexual high-risk population than for the general population.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis E/epidemiology , Hepatitis E/transmission , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hepatitis E virus/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Sexual Behavior , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/transmission , Young Adult
6.
Euro Surveill ; 22(28)2017 Jul 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28749331

ABSTRACT

Pertussis is most severe among unvaccinated infants (< 1 year of age), and still leads to several reported deaths in the Netherlands every year. In order to avoid pertussis-related infant morbidity and mortality, pertussis surveillance data are used to guide pertussis control measures. However, more insight into the accuracy of pertussis surveillance and control, and into the range of healthcare and public health-related factors that impede this are needed. We analysed a unique combination of data sources from one Dutch region of 1.1 million residents, including data from laboratory databases and local public health notifications between 2010 and 2013. This large study (n = 12,090 pertussis tests) reveals possible misdiagnoses, substantial under-notification (18%, 412/2,301 laboratory positive episodes) and a delay between patient symptoms and notification to the local public health services (median 34 days, interquartile range (IQR): 27-54). It is likely that the misdiagnoses, under-notification and overall delay in surveillance data are not unique to this area of the Netherlands, and are generalisable to other countries in Europe. In addition to preventive measures such as maternal immunisation, based on current findings, we further recommend greater adherence to testing guidelines, standardisation of test interpretation guidelines, use of automatic notification systems and earlier preventive measures.


Subject(s)
Bordetella pertussis/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Disease Notification/methods , Mandatory Reporting , Primary Prevention/methods , Whooping Cough/diagnosis , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Disease Notification/standards , Female , Humans , Immunization , Incidence , Infant , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Sentinel Surveillance , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , United States Public Health Service , Whooping Cough/epidemiology , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Whooping Cough/transmission
7.
PLoS One ; 12(3): e0172383, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28278180

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite high vaccination coverage, pertussis incidence in the Netherlands is amongst the highest in Europe with a shifting tendency towards adults and elderly. Early detection of outbreaks and preventive actions are necessary to prevent severe complications in infants. Efficient pertussis control requires additional background knowledge about the determinants of testing and possible determinants of the current pertussis incidence. Therefore, the aim of our study is to examine the possibility of locating possible pertussis outbreaks using space-time cluster detection and to examine the determinants of pertussis testing and incidence using geographically weighted regression models. METHODS: We analysed laboratory registry data including all geocoded pertussis tests in the southern area of the Netherlands between 2007 and 2013. Socio-demographic and infrastructure-related population data were matched to the geo-coded laboratory data. The spatial scan statistic was applied to detect spatial and space-time clusters of testing, incidence and test-positivity. Geographically weighted Poisson regression (GWPR) models were then constructed to model the associations between the age-specific rates of testing and incidence and possible population-based determinants. RESULTS: Space-time clusters for pertussis incidence overlapped with space-time clusters for testing, reflecting a strong relationship between testing and incidence, irrespective of the examined age group. Testing for pertussis itself was overall associated with lower socio-economic status, multi-person-households, proximity to primary school and availability of healthcare. The current incidence in contradiction is mainly determined by testing and is not associated with a lower socioeconomic status. DISCUSSION: Testing for pertussis follows to an extent the general healthcare seeking behaviour for common respiratory infections, whereas the current pertussis incidence is largely the result of testing. More testing would thus not necessarily improve pertussis control. Detecting outbreaks using space-time cluster detection is feasible but needs to adjust for the strong impact of testing on the detection of pertussis cases.


Subject(s)
Spatial Regression , Spatio-Temporal Analysis , Whooping Cough/diagnosis , Whooping Cough/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Cluster Analysis , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
8.
PLoS One ; 10(9): e0135656, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26352611

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infections are a major cause for liver diseases. A large proportion of these infections remain hidden to care due to its mostly asymptomatic nature. Population-based screening and screening targeted on behavioural risk groups had not proven to be effective in revealing these hidden infections. Therefore, more practically applicable approaches to target screenings are necessary. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and spatial epidemiological methods may provide a more feasible basis for screening interventions through the identification of hotspots as well as demographic and socio-economic determinants. METHODS: Analysed data included all HCV tests (n = 23,800) performed in the southern area of the Netherlands between 2002-2008. HCV positivity was defined as a positive immunoblot or polymerase chain reaction test. Population data were matched to the geocoded HCV test data. The spatial scan statistic was applied to detect areas with elevated HCV risk. We applied global regression models to determine associations between population-based determinants and HCV risk. Geographically weighted Poisson regression models were then constructed to determine local differences of the association between HCV risk and population-based determinants. RESULTS: HCV prevalence varied geographically and clustered in urban areas. The main population at risk were middle-aged males, non-western immigrants and divorced persons. Socio-economic determinants consisted of one-person households, persons with low income and mean property value. However, the association between HCV risk and demographic as well as socio-economic determinants displayed strong regional and intra-urban differences. DISCUSSION: The detection of local hotspots in our study may serve as a basis for prioritization of areas for future targeted interventions. Demographic and socio-economic determinants associated with HCV risk show regional differences underlining that a one-size-fits-all approach even within small geographic areas may not be appropriate. Future screening interventions need to consider the spatially varying association between HCV risk and associated demographic and socio-economic determinants.


Subject(s)
Hepacivirus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Cluster Analysis , Female , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Humans , Least-Squares Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...