ABSTRACT
Background: Malposition of the femoral tunnel during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction may increase the risk of recurrence of patellar dislocation due to isometric changes during flexion and extension. Different methods have been described to identify the MPFL isometric point using fluoroscopy. However, femoral tunnel malposition was found to be the cause of 38.1% of revisions due to patellar redislocation. This high rate of malposition has raised the question of individual anatomical variability. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 80 native knees using the CLASS (MRI-generated Compressed Lateral and anteroposterior Anatomical Systematic Sequence) algorithm to identify the femoral MPFL insertion. The insertions were identified on the MRI views by 2 senior orthopaedic surgeons in order to assess the reliability and reproducibility of the method. The distribution of the MPFL insertion locations was then described in a 2-plane coordinate system and compared with MPFL insertion locations identified with other methods in previously published studies. Results: The CLASS MPFL footprint was located 0.83 mm anterior to the posterior cortex (line 1) and 3.66 mm proximal to the Blumensaat line (line 2). Analysis demonstrated 0.90 and 0.89 reproducibility and 0.89 and 0.80 reliability of the CLASS method to identify the anatomical femoral MPFL insertion point. The distribution did not correlate with previously published data obtained with other methods. The definitions of the MPFL insertion point in the studies by Schöttle et al. and Fujino et al. most closely approximated the CLASS location in relation to the posterior femoral cortex, but there were significant differences between the CLASS method and all 4 previously published methods in relation to the proximal-distal location. When we averaged the distances from line 1 and line 2, the method that came closest to the CLASS method was that of Stephen et al., followed by the method of Schöttle et al. Conclusions: The CLASS algorithm is a reliable and reproducible method to identify the MPFL femoral insertion from MRI views. Measurement using the CLASS algorithm shows substantial individual anatomical variation that may not be adequately captured with existing measurement methods. While further research must target translation of this method to clinical use, we believe that this method has the potential to create a safe template for sagittal fluoroscopic identification of the femoral tunnel during MPFL surgical reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hip dysplasia is a complex static-dynamic pathology leading to chronic joint instability and osteoarthritis. Because our understanding of the underlying pathomorphologies of hip dysplasia, both on the macro and micro levels, has evolved, an updated definition is needed. QUESTION: What is the definition of hip dysplasia in 2023? METHODS: By summarizing and reviewing relevant literature, we provide an up-to-date definition of hip dysplasia with a guide to appropriately making the diagnosis. RESULTS: In addition to the pathognomonic parameters, supportive and descriptive indicators, as well as secondary changes are used to fully characterize instability inherent in hip dysplasia. The primary diagnostic tool is always the plain anteroposterior pelvis radiograph, which can be supplemented by additional investigations (MRI of the hip with intraarticular contrast agent; CT) if necessary. CONCLUSION: The complexity, subtlety, and diversity of the pathomorphology of residual hip dysplasia requires careful, multilevel diagnosis and treatment planning in specialized centers.
Subject(s)
Hip Dislocation, Congenital , Hip Dislocation , Humans , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Acetabulum/pathology , Hip Dislocation/diagnosis , Osteotomy , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnosisABSTRACT
CASE: Nondisplaced lateral compression type 1 fractures of the pelvic ring are usually treated nonoperatively. We describe a case of nonunion after conservative treatment of such a fracture in a healthy 59-year-old female patient due to the interposition of a tension-free vaginal tape in the fracture gap. An anterior intrapelvic approach with plate osteosynthesis was used to stabilize the fracture once the tape was removed from the fracture gap. After 3 months, the fractures had healed and the patient was pain-free. CONCLUSIONS: Previous urogynecologic interventions should be routinely inquired about and considered in anterior pelvic ring injuries.
