Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arthropod Struct Dev ; 50: 43-52, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30974153

ABSTRACT

Naupliar development in copepods includes the generation of usually five pairs of post-mandibular segments. Since copepod nauplii show no outer body articulation, the only indication of larval segmentation is the expression of limb buds. Yet, in copepods the timing and sequence of limb bud expression in larval development varies to a large degree. In harpacticoid nauplii for instance, the 1st maxillae are formed at an early naupliar stage. By contrast, the four remaining pairs of limb buds frequently appear simultaneously with the last naupliar stage. The complete process of larval segment formation takes place under the body surface and has never been described in detail. To broaden our knowledge of early segmentation in copepods, we here describe the segmentation of the harpacticoid nauplius Tigriopus californicus by analysing the expression of the segment marker Engrailed and uncover the sequential addition of seven post-mandibular segments. The stripe formation and arrangement of labelled cells corresponds largely to those of other crustaceans studied in this respect. Together with a morphological approach using histology, SEM, and 3D-reconstructions based on CLSM we solve the so far controversial identity of the external limb buds in the final naupliar stage. In contrast to previous studies, we can show that all limb pairs from the 1st maxillae to the 3rd thoracopods are formed. Yet, the anlage of the maxilliped (1st thoracopod) remains hidden underneath the cuticle being never externally expressed in the nauplius.


Subject(s)
Body Patterning , Copepoda/growth & development , Animals , Arthropod Proteins/genetics , Arthropod Proteins/metabolism , Body Patterning/genetics , Copepoda/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Larva/genetics , Larva/growth & development , Microscopy, Confocal , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
2.
Dev Genes Evol ; 228(2): 119-129, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29651555

ABSTRACT

Arthropod early neurogenesis shows distinct patterns that have been interpreted in an evolutionary framework. For instance, crustaceans and Hexapoda form the taxon Tetraconata and share the differentiation of specific neural precursors, the neuroblasts, a character which sets them apart from Chelicerata and Myriapoda. Neuroblasts are relatively large stem cells that generate ganglion mother cells by asymmetric divisions. Ganglion mother cells typically divide once to give rise to neurons and glia cells. In hexapods, neuroblasts segregate from the neuroectoderm before they begin their characteristic proliferative activity. In the crustaceans studied so far, neuroblasts remain in the neuroectoderm. Yet, detailed studies on early neurogenesis of crustaceans at the cellular level are largely restricted to some malacostracan and branchiopod species. Crustaceans are very diverse and likely paraphyletic with respect to hexapods. Hence, knowledge about neural differentiation in other crustacean taxa might contribute to the understanding of evolution of neurogenesis in Tetraconata. Here, we describe the early neurogenesis during naupliar development of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. We show that neuroblasts are present that generate ganglion mother cells, which in turn divide to give rise to neurons of the ventral nerve cord. These two neural precursor cell types and their specific arrangement correspond to what has been found in other crustaceans. One obvious difference concerns the relative size of the neuroblasts, which are not much larger than their progeny. Our results complement the picture of neural differentiation in crustaceans and suggest that superficially located neuroblasts are likely the ancestral condition in Tetraconata.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Copepoda/growth & development , Copepoda/physiology , Neurogenesis , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Cells, Cultured , Copepoda/embryology , Copepoda/genetics , Larva/growth & development , Larva/physiology , Neural Stem Cells/cytology , Neural Stem Cells/physiology , Phylogeny
3.
J Med Genet ; 49(7): 437-41, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22717651

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is an autosomal dominant skeletal disorder characterised by hypoplastic or absent clavicles, increased head circumference, large fontanels, dental anomalies and short stature. Although CCD is usually caused by mutations leading to haploinsufficiency of RUNX2, the underlying genetic cause remains unresolved in about 25% of cases. METHODS: Array comparative genomic hybridisation was performed to detect copy number variations (CNVs). Identified CNVs were characterised by quantitative PCR and sequencing analyses. The effect of candidate genes on mineralisation was evaluated using viral overexpression in chicken cells. RESULTS: In 2 out of 16 cases, the authors identified microduplications upstream of MSX2 on chromosome 5q35.2. One of the unrelated affected individuals presented with a phenocopy of CCD. In addition to a classical CCD phenotype, the other subject had a complex synpolydactyly of the hands and postaxial polydactyly of the feet which have so far never been reported in association with CCD or CNVs on 5q35.2. The duplications overlap in an ∼219 kb region that contains several highly conserved non-coding elements which are likely to be involved in MSX2 gene regulation. Functional analyses demonstrated that the inhibitory effect of Msx2 overexpression on mineralisation cannot be ameliorated by forced Runx2 expression. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that CNVs in non-coding regions can cause developmental defects, and that the resulting phenotype can be distinct from those caused by point mutations within the corresponding gene. Taken together, these findings reveal an additional mechanism for the pathogenesis of CCD, particularly with regard to the regulation of MSX2.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Duplication , Cleidocranial Dysplasia/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Phenotype , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Chickens , Child , Child, Preschool , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5/genetics , Cleidocranial Dysplasia/metabolism , Core Binding Factor Alpha 1 Subunit/genetics , Core Binding Factor Alpha 1 Subunit/metabolism , DNA Copy Number Variations , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Haploinsufficiency , Heterozygote , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Humans , Male , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Point Mutation , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Sequence Analysis, DNA
4.
PLoS Genet ; 7(12): e1002416, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22216011

ABSTRACT

Several highly conserved genes play a role in anterior neural plate patterning of vertebrates and in head and brain patterning of insects. However, head involution in Drosophila has impeded a systematic identification of genes required for insect head formation. Therefore, we use the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum in order to comprehensively test the function of orthologs of vertebrate neural plate patterning genes for a function in insect head development. RNAi analysis reveals that most of these genes are indeed required for insect head capsule patterning, and we also identified several genes that had not been implicated in this process before. Furthermore, we show that Tc-six3/optix acts upstream of Tc-wingless, Tc-orthodenticle1, and Tc-eyeless to control anterior median development. Finally, we demonstrate that Tc-six3/optix is the first gene known to be required for the embryonic formation of the central complex, a midline-spanning brain part connected to the neuroendocrine pars intercerebralis. These functions are very likely conserved among bilaterians since vertebrate six3 is required for neuroendocrine and median brain development with certain mutations leading to holoprosencephaly.


Subject(s)
Body Patterning/genetics , Brain/growth & development , Embryonic Development/genetics , Eye Proteins/genetics , Genes, Insect , Head/growth & development , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Tribolium/growth & development , Tribolium/genetics , Animals , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/genetics , Eye Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gene Knockdown Techniques/methods , Holoprosencephaly/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Humans , Mice , Mutation , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Neural Plate/growth & development , Organogenesis , RNA Interference , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid , Homeobox Protein SIX3
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL