Screening of the ryanodine 1 gene for malignant hyperthermia causative mutations by high resolution melt curve analysis.

BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia (MH) can be determined by performing an in vitro (muscle) contracture test (IVCT) or by identifying a known MH causative mutation in the ryanodine receptor 1 gene (RYR1). Genetic diagnosis has an advantage over IVCT because it is less invasive. Direct sequencing of the very large RYR1 coding region (15.117 bases) is a laborious and expensive task. In this study, we applied the High Resolution Melting (HRM) curve analysis as a tool to screen the entire coding region of the gene. METHODS: Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples in a cohort of 16 MH-susceptible patients diagnosed by the IVCT. The total coding region of RYR1 was divided and amplified by polymerase chain reaction in 131 DNA fragments and the melting profiles were compared with those of control samples. HRM curves were evaluated by Rotor-Gene Q software and visual inspection. Fragments showing aberrant melting profiles were sequenced to identify the underlying sequence variation. RESULTS: A subset of 520 of 2520 DNA fragments (21%) showed significantly aberrant melting profiles. Upon sequencing, 131 known polymorphisms and 17 known or suspected mutations were found in 13 of 16 MH-susceptible patients (81%). Thus, the workload of sequencing was reduced by 79%. CONCLUSION: HRM curve analysis is a sensitive and cost-effective tool for the identification of nucleotide sequence variants in complex genes such as the RYR1 gene.

Receptor oligomerization and beyond: a case study in bone morphogenetic proteins.

BACKGROUND: Transforming growth factor (TGF)beta superfamily members transduce signals by oligomerizing two classes of serine/threonine kinase receptors, termed type I and type II. In contrast to the large number of ligands only seven type I and five type II receptors have been identified in mammals, implicating a prominent promiscuity in ligand-receptor interaction. Since a given ligand can usually interact with more than one receptor of either subtype, differences in binding affinities and specificities are likely important for the generation of distinct ligand-receptor complexes with different signaling properties. RESULTS: In vitro interaction analyses showed two different prototypes of binding kinetics, 'slow on/slow off' and 'fast on/fast off'. Surprisingly, the binding specificity of ligands to the receptors of one subtype is only moderate. As suggested from the dimeric nature of the ligands, binding to immobilized receptors shows avidity due to cooperative binding caused by bivalent ligand-receptor interactions. To compare these in vitro observations to the situation in vivo, binding studies on whole cells employing homodimeric as well as heterodimeric bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) mutants were performed. Interestingly, low and high affinity binding sites were identified, as defined by the presence of either one or two BMP receptor (BMPR)-IA receptor chains, respectively. Both sites contribute to different cellular responses in that the high affinity sites allow a rapid transient response at low ligand concentrations whereas the low affinity sites facilitate sustained signaling but higher ligand concentrations are required. CONCLUSION: Binding of a ligand to a single high affinity receptor chain functioning as anchoring molecule and providing sufficient complex stability allows the subsequent formation of signaling competent complexes. Another receptor of the same subtype, and up to two receptors of the other subtype, can then be recruited. Thus, the resulting receptor arrangement can principally consist of four different receptors, which is consistent with our interaction analysis showing low ligand-receptor specificity within one subtype class. For BMP2, further complexity is added by the fact that heterooligomeric signaling complexes containing only one type I receptor chain can also be found. This indicates that despite prominent ligand receptor promiscuity a manifold of diverse signals might be generated in this receptor limited system.

Structure analysis of bone morphogenetic protein-2 type I receptor complexes reveals a mechanism of receptor inactivation in juvenile polyposis syndrome.

Bone morphogenetic proteins regulate many developmental processes during embryogenesis as well as tissue homeostasis in the adult. Signaling of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) is accomplished by binding to two types of serine/threonine kinase transmembrane receptors termed type I and type II. Because a large number of ligands signal through a limited number of receptors, ligand-receptor interaction in the BMP superfamily is highly promiscuous, with a ligand binding to various receptors and a receptor binding many different BMP ligands. In this study we investigate the interaction of BMP-2 with its two high affinity type I receptors, BMP receptors IA (BMPR-IA) and BMPR-IB. Interestingly, 50% of the residues in the BMP-2 binding epitope of the BMPR-IA receptor are exchanged in BMPR-IB without a decrease in binding affinity or specificity for BMP-2. Our structural and functional analyses show that promiscuous binding of BMP-2 to both type I receptors is achieved by inherent backbone and side-chain flexibility as well as by variable hydration of the ligand-receptor interface enabling the BMP-2 surface to adapt to different receptor geometries. Despite the high degree of amino acid variability found in BMPR-IA and BMPR-IB binding equally to BMP-2, three single point missense mutations in the ectodomain of BMPR-IA cannot be tolerated. In juvenile polyposis syndrome these mutations have been shown to inactivate BMPR-IA. On the basis of our biochemical and biophysical analyses, we can show that the mutations, which are located outside the ligand binding epitope, alter the local or global fold of the receptor, thereby inactivating BMPR-IA and causing a loss of the BMP-2 tumor suppressor function in colon epithelial cells.