Teacher Perspectives of Pediatric Neuropsychology and Supporting Children With Chronic Health Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to examine teachers' perceptions of neuropsychological reports broadly and their preparedness to support the educational needs of students with chronic health conditions. METHOD: Teachers were selected from across the United States using stratified random sampling. 280 teachers (76.2% female; 58.4% public school; 53.9% rural setting) completed an anonymous electronic survey via Qualtrics. RESULTS: Half of the teachers were familiar with neuropsychology and previously read a neuropsychological report, which the majority found useful with a preference toward shorter reports. Most found listed recommendations to be appropriate, but half of teachers identified limited resources as a barrier to implementation. Teachers reported limited education, training, and comfort for providing accommodations to children with chronic health conditions, which was significantly lower for cancer, congenital heart disease, and sickle cell disease. Older teachers, more years of experience, and special education teachers demonstrated significantly higher levels of education, training, and comfort. Frequency of implementing accommodations was significantly negatively correlated with perceived burden and positively correlated with perceived benefit across most accommodations. Teachers reported a preference for single-page handouts and speaking directly to neuropsychologists about the specific learning needs of students with chronic health conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight areas for future research and intervention regarding teacher's preparedness for working with children with chronic health groups and opportunities to improve communication between neuropsychologists and teachers to ultimately improve access to educational supports and overall quality of life of students with chronic health conditions.

Neurocognitive function and health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with CHD with pulmonary valve dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive impairment and quality of life are two important long-term challenges for patients with complex CHD. The impact of re-interventions during adolescence and young adulthood on neurocognition and quality of life is not well understood. METHODS: In this prospective longitudinal multi-institutional study, patients 13-30 years old with severe CHD referred for surgical or transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement were enrolled. Clinical characteristics were collected, and executive function and quality of life were assessed prior to the planned pulmonary re-intervention. These results were compared to normative data and were compared between treatment strategies. RESULTS: Among 68 patients enrolled from 2016 to 2020, a nearly equal proportion were referred for surgical and transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (53% versus 47%). Tetralogy of Fallot was the most common diagnosis (59%) and pulmonary re-intervention indications included stenosis (25%), insufficiency (40%), and mixed disease (35%). There were no substantial differences between patients referred for surgical and transcatheter therapy. Executive functioning deficits were evident in 19-31% of patients and quality of life was universally lower compared to normative sample data. However, measures of executive function and quality of life did not differ between the surgical and transcatheter patients. CONCLUSION: In this patient group, impairments in neurocognitive function and quality of life are common and can be significant. Given similar baseline characteristics, comparing changes in neurocognitive outcomes and quality of life after surgical versus transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement will offer unique insights into how treatment approaches impact these important long-term patient outcomes.

Sleep and neurobehavioral functioning in survivors of pediatric cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Sleep problems are a common late effect in survivors of pediatric cancer. Growing literature suggests deficits in sleep functioning may be related to more impairing neurobehavioral outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of parent reported sleep concerns in survivors of pediatric cancer, as well as evaluate the relationship between sleep and neurobehavioral functioning utilizing both parent and teacher input. METHODS: The study included parent-teacher dyads of 75 survivors of pediatric cancer between the ages of six and 17 who completed a clinical neuropsychological evaluation with embedded measures of neurobehavioral functioning and sleep, including excessive daytime sleepiness and snoring. Bivariate correlations and multiple linear regressions were conducted to evaluate the relationship between sleep and neurobehavioral functioning. RESULTS: No significant difference in parent reported sleep concerns was found with regard to demographic, diagnostic, or treatment variables. Daytime sleepiness was significantly elevated for 28% of the sample; snoring was not identified as a significant concern. Daytime sleepiness was significantly associated with worse neurobehavioral outcomes as reported by parents and teachers, including inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, peer difficulties, anxiety, depression, somatic complaints, and aggressive behaviors. Daytime sleepiness was not significantly related to report of learning problems. CONCLUSIONS: Results further support that daytime sleepiness, as reported by parents, impacts approximately one third of survivors of pediatric cancer and is associated with worse neurobehavioral outcomes across home and school environments. As a result, it is vital that sleep functioning is a target of assessment in annual survivorship care. Future longitudinal studies are needed to further delineate the directionality of the sleep-neurobehavioral relationship in survivors.

Visual Attention and Math Performance in Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: Attentional and academic difficulties, particularly in math, are common in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Of cognitive deficits experienced by survivors of childhood ALL, attention deficits may be particularly responsive to intervention. However, it is unknown whether deficits in particular aspects of attention are associated with deficits in math skills. The current study investigated relationships between math calculation skills, performance on an objective measure of sustained attention, and parent- and teacher-reported attention difficulties. METHOD: Twenty-four survivors of childhood ALL (Mage = 13.5 years, SD = 2.8 years) completed a computerized measure of sustained attention and response control and a written measure of math calculation skills in the context of a comprehensive clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Parent and teacher ratings of inattention and impulsivity were obtained. RESULTS: Visual response control and visual attention accounted for 26.4% of the variance observed among math performance scores after controlling for IQ (p < .05). Teacher-rated, but not parent-rated, inattention was significantly negatively correlated with math calculation scores. CONCLUSIONS: Consistency of responses to visual stimuli on a computerized measure of attention is a unique predictor of variance in math performance among survivors of childhood ALL. Objective testing of visual response control, rather than parent-rated attentional problems, may have clinical utility in identifying ALL survivors at risk for math difficulties.

[Formula: see text]Congenital heart disease: A primer for the pediatric neuropsychologist.

Congenital heart disease (CHD) affects millions of people worldwide, including over one million children in the United States. Approximately 25% of children born with CHD require intensive surgical intervention within the first year of life. Despite improved rates of survival into adulthood - rates that exceed 90% in the modern era - children and adolescents with CHD remain at risk for neurological injury and a range of neurobehavioral and psychosocial challenges that pose a threat to quality of life across the lifespan. Consequently, as experts in both clinical psychology and brain development, neuropsychologists are becoming increasingly involved in cardiac follow-up and monitoring to promote optimal developmental outcomes. The primary objective of this paper is to provide an evidence-based, clinically-oriented primer on CHD for pediatric neuropsychologists working with this growing population of survivors. Following an introduction to current standard-of-care guidelines for managing children and adolescents with CHD, we present an overview of brain development within the context of CHD, review neuropsychological outcomes, examine factors influencing variability in outcomes, and discuss implications and strategies for clinical assessment.