ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Peer support has been shown to support personal recovery from mental illness. It is unclear whether the effects of peer support across different mental illnesses depend on the organizational setting. The authors reviewed the effectiveness of peer support for both personal recovery and clinical recovery of adults with any mental illness and evaluated the effectiveness of peer support in different settings. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. A meta-analysis of outcomes of personal and clinical recoveries at the end of interventions was conducted. RESULTS: In total, 49 RCTs with 12,477 participants with any mental illness were included. Most of the trials had a high risk for bias. Results of the meta-analysis indicated that peer support in general had a small positive effect on personal recovery (standard mean difference [SMD]=0.20; 95% CI=0.11-0.29) and decreased anxiety symptoms (SMD=-0.21; 95% CI=-0.40 to -0.02), with most trials evaluating peers added to mental health-related hospital services. No data for peers in established service roles were available for the meta-analysis. Peer-designed interventions developed to be provided independently of hospital services and delivered in community settings had a modest effect on self-advocacy. A small nonsignificant effect on personal recovery for peer support delivered online was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The effect on personal recovery from mental illness was most evident in peer support added to hospital services. High-quality RCTs with comparable cocreated interventions and clear descriptions of mechanisms of change are needed to further investigate peer support efficacy.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services , Adult , Humans , Mental Disorders/therapy , Counseling , AnxietyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Functional gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms can develop into persistent states often categorised as the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In the severe end of the GI symptom continuum, other coexisting symptoms are common. We aimed to investigate the GI symptom continuum in relation to mortality and development of GI diseases, and to examine if coexisting symptoms had an influence on the outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A longitudinal population-based study comprising two 5-year follow-up studies: Dan-Monica1 (1982-1987) and Inter99 (1999-2004). IBS was defined according to a population-based IBS definition. The pooled cohort (n = 7278) was followed until December 2013 in Central Registries. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent had no GI symptoms, 39% had GI symptoms but never fulfilled the IBS definition, 8% had fluctuating IBS and 2% had persisting IBS. There was no significant association between symptom groups and mortality (p = 0.47). IBS and GI symptoms with abdominal pain were significantly associated with development of GI diseases. Only GI symptoms with abdominal pain were associated with development of severe GI diseases (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: [1.06-1.79]). There were no statistically significant interactions between symptom groups and coexisting symptoms in relation to the two outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: GI diseases were seen more frequently, but IBS was not associated with severe GI diseases or increased mortality. Clinicians should be more aware when patients do not fulfil the IBS definition, but continue to report frequent abdominal pain. Coexisting symptoms did not influence mortality and development of GI diseases.
