Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(10): 1192-1194, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29779691

ABSTRACT

Innovative methods to ensure better compliance in hand hygiene are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to determine if WiFi-based hand hygiene dispenser-driven self-assessment systems (Wireless Fidelity, WiFi-dispenser) can support the work of infection control teams. Our results suggest that the continuous monitoring of dispenser usage can be a valuable addition to infection prevention and control programs, when used in a bundle in combination with conventional hand hygiene training.


Subject(s)
Hand Hygiene/instrumentation , Hand Hygiene/methods , Infection Control/standards , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Equipment and Supplies , Guideline Adherence , Hand Disinfection/methods , Hospitals, University , Humans
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 41(11): 1001-6, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23669298

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The anesthesia working area represents an environment with a high density of invasive and, thus, infection-prone procedures. The 2 primary goals of this study were (1) to perform a precise analysis of anesthesia-related hand hygiene (HH) procedures and (2) to optimize HH compliance. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, triphase before/after study to determine opportunities for and compliance with hand disinfection (World Health Organization definition) in an anesthesia working area. Standard operating procedures were optimized for invasive procedures during 2 predefined intervention periods to improve work flow practices. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty anesthesia procedures were evaluated with 12,142 indications for HH. Compliance significantly increased from 10% (465/4,636) to 30% (1,202/4,029) and finally to 55% (1,881/3,477; all P < .001) in phases I, II, and III, respectively. We identified a significant increase in the number of hand rubs performed during 1 anesthesia procedure (2 to 8, respectively; P < .001) in parallel with a significant decrease in number of opportunities needing a hand rub (24 to 14, respectively; P < .0001) because of improved work flow practices. Notably, the greatest improvement was seen before aseptic tasks (8% to 55%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first detailed data on anesthesia-related and indication-specific HH. Importantly, HH compliance improved significantly without a noticeable increasing workload.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Guideline Adherence/organization & administration , Hand Hygiene/methods , Humans , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...