Job mobility and job performance: beliefs about social and occupational (dis)advantages as mediators.

Background. Modern working conditions require an increased amount of spatial mobility from employed personnel. Research suggests that different types of job mobility might exert negative effects on well-being and health, and additionally have different costs and benefits for the work and the social domains. Methods. Using data from 3191 members of the German Armed Forces, we investigated the effects of four different types of job mobility (long-distance commuters, overnighters, residential mobiles and multi-mobiles) in contrast to non-mobiles on employees' subjective job performance as an occupationally relevant outcome. Moreover, we expected beliefs about social and occupational advantages and disadvantages to mediate the effects of job mobility on subjective job performance. Results. A single concrete event during relocation had fewer negative consequences compared to the effects of circular mobility or multi-mobility. Moreover, beliefs about occupational and social advantages and disadvantages were differently associated with the different types of job mobility and partially mediated the direct effects of job mobility on job performance. Conclusions. Not all types of job mobility are an impairment and extra-organizational stress. Rather, the evaluation and perception of occupational and social (dis)advantages is crucial for the effects of different types of job mobility on organizational relevant outcomes.

Sporting activity, prevalence of overweight, and risk factors: cross-sectional study of more than 12 500 participants aged 16 to 25 years.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies show that habits detrimental to health are becoming established ever earlier in life. Because most of these investigations focus on adolescents up to the age of 18 years, it is largely unknown whether and to what extent negative behavioral modifications are intensified in young adults. METHODS: Within the cross-sectional study "Fit fürs Leben" (Fit for Life) 12 835 volunteers aged 16 to 25 years were anthropometrically investigated and interviewed about their lifestyle and habits (sporting activity, nutrition and health-related behavior). RESULTS: Data on anthropometric (BMI, waist circumference, body fat) and health-relevant (lack of exercise, smoking) characteristics as well as the frequency of cardiovascular risk factors show a clear increase in unhealthy attributes, particularly among those aged 20 to 25 years. Fifty percent of 25-year-old men are overweight, 60% smoke, and around one third do not participate in sport. Although only one quarter of women aged 16 to 25 years are overweight, women engage in sport much less frequently. Only one quarter of all study participants display none of the investigated cardiovascular risk factors. DISCUSSION: The health-detrimental tendencies increase considerably after the age of 20. Efficient cross-institutional prevention campaigns are urgently necessary to promote and continually support a health-conscious life-style.