ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Hamate fractures are infrequent and often overlooked wrist injuries. Our objective is to present the Shish-Kebab method, a surgical approach utilized in the treatment of intra-articular Hamate body fractures occurring concurrently with fourth metacarpal base fractures and dislocations. METHODS: This study was conducted at a single-center using a prospective design. It included patients aged 16-65 with Kim Type IIB fractures affecting the dominant side. Patients with the same features of fracture and carpometacarpal (CMC) instability findings were divided into two groups according to the success of the closed reduction procedure. In the conservative group (8 patients), all fractures and instability findings were successfully resolved with closed reduction and a short arm plaster cast. The surgical group (8 patients), comprising those requiring open reduction and internal fixation, underwent the application of the 'shish kebab' method. RESULTS: At the 6th and 12th week follow-ups, no significant differences were observed between the groups concerning pVAS and QuickDash scores. However, upon examining the QuickDash scores, a statistically significant difference emerged between the 6th and 12th weeks within both the conservative (p = 0.017) and surgical (p = 0.012) groups in the intragroup analysis. Grip strength, measured as 83.78% of the contralateral side in the surgical group and 79.51% in the conservative group, did not exhibit a statistically significant difference (p = 0.462). CONCLUSION: In the management of Hamate body intra-articular fractures and accompanying fourth metacarpal base fracture dislocations, good clinical results can be achieved with the 'Shish-Kebab' method in cases where closed reduction is unsuccessful.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: This study was designed to compare mirror therapy and visual feedback with the control group in adhesive capsulitis patients. Methods: Thirty-six patients, divided into three groups as mirror therapy, visual feedback and control for 15 sessions of treatment. Evaluations were made before treatment, at 6th and 10th weeks. Bilateral glenohumeral exercise was performed at the end of each session with the affected extremity behind the mirror in the mirror group, with both upper extremities in front of the mirror in the visual feedback group, and without the mirror in the control group. Results: There were statistically significant differences between the mirror therapy and visual feedback in terms of pain severity change, and the visual feedback was superior to the change in pain severity compared to the control. Visual feedback showed significant improvement in mean change from baseline to week 10 in shoulder pain and disability index scores compared to control (p = 0.012). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of modified constant score, proprioception and shoulder range of motion. Conclusion: It was determined that the exercises performed by seeing the affected extremity in the mirror were more effective than mirror therapy and control group.
