A Novel Way of Measuring Dual-Task Interference: The Reliability and Construct Validity of the Dual-Task Effect Battery in Neurodegenerative Disease.

BACKGROUND: Decreased automaticity is common among individuals with neurodegenerative disease and is often assessed using dual-task (DT) paradigms. However, the best methods for assessing performance changes related to DT demands remain inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability and validity of a novel battery of DT measures (DT Effect-Battery (DTE-B)) encompassing three domains: task-specific interference, task prioritization, and automaticity. METHODS: Data for this retrospective cross-sectional study included 125 participants with Parkinson's disease (PD), 127 participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 84 healthy older adults. Reliability analyses were conducted using a subset of each population. DTE-B measures were calculated from single and DT performance on the Timed Up and Go test and a serial subtraction task. Construct validity was evaluated via associations within the DTE-B and with theoretically supported measures as well as known-groups validity analyses. RESULTS: Good to excellent reliability was found for DTE-B measures of task interference (motor and cognitive DT effects) (ICCs≥.658) and automaticity (combined DT effect (cDTE)) (ICCs≥.938). Evidence for convergent validity was found with associations within the hypothesized constructs. Known-groups validity analyses revealed differences in the DTE-B among the healthy group and PD and AD groups (ps≤.001), excepting task prioritization (ps≥.061). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence to support the DTE-B as a reliable measure of multiple constructs pertinent to DT performance. The cDTE demonstrated evidence to support its validity as a measure of automaticity. Further investigation of the utility of the DTE-B in both PD and AD, as well as other populations, is warranted.

Health Promotion and Wellness in Neurologic Physical Therapy: Strategies to Advance Practice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neurologic physical therapy (PT) can assist people with neurologic conditions and injuries to optimize their health and well-being by addressing barriers at the individual, relationship, community, and societal levels. The purpose of this special interest article is to provide consensus-driven strategies to address barriers to implementing health promotion and wellness (HPW)-related neurologic PT practice. SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS: Environmental scan, literature review, and expert input were used to determine barriers and develop strategies. Barriers include lack of time; low knowledge, self-efficacy, and awareness; client complexity; and lack of HPW resources; as well as concerns regarding payment and scope of practice. Four key strategies emerged: (1) develop and disseminate a consensus-based scope of practice for HPW in neurologic PT; (2) increase knowledge of resources related to HPW; (3) promote delivery models for HPW-related neurologic PT; and (4) encourage advocacy, community building and partnership along the continuum of care. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clinicians should practice to their full scope of HPW-related PT practice. This includes optimizing movement, including physical activity and fitness, as well as reinforcing the importance of healthy sleep, nutrition, stress, and smoking cessation. These activities address primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. Clinicians are encouraged to report their experiences with HPW-focused delivery models and outcomes. Additional research is needed to understand the full impact of HPW on PT practice (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A364).