ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to identify prognostic (associated with general outcome) and prescriptive (associated with differential outcome in two different settings) predictors of improvement in a naturalistic multi-center study on inpatient and day hospital treatment in major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: 250 inpatients and 250 day hospital patients of eight psychosomatic hospitals were assessed at admission, discharge and a 3-months follow-up. Primary outcome was defined as a reduction of depressive symptomatology from admission to discharge and from discharge to follow-up (QIDS-C, total score). Percent improvement scores at discharge and at follow-up were entered as dependent variables into two General Linear Models with a set of predictor variables and the respective interaction terms with treatment setting. The selection of predictor sets was guided by statistical methods of variable preselection (LASSO). RESULTS: Three variables were associated with less improvement from admission to discharge: the number of additional axis-I diagnoses, axis-II co-morbidity (SCID) and lower motivation (expert assessment). Social support (F-SozU) predicted symptom course between discharge and 3-month follow-up. Patients with no absent / sick days prior to admission showed a less favorable symptom course after discharge when treated as inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with co-morbidity show less improvement during the active treatment phase. Motivation can be considered a prerequisite for symptom reduction, whereas social support seems to be an important factor for the maintenance of treatment gains. The lack in prescriptive predictors found may point to the fact that inpatient and day hospital treatment have comparable effects for most subgroups of patients with MDD.
Subject(s)
Day Care, Medical , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Hospitalization , Inpatients , Adult , Comorbidity , Depression/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , Inpatients/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Psychophysiologic Disorders/therapy , Sick Leave , Social Support , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In major depression (MDD), hospital treatment is an option in more severe cases or if outpatient treatment failed. Psychosomatic hospitals in Germany provide treatment programs with multimodal psychotherapy, either in an inpatient or a day hospital setting. In the context of health care research, this study aimed (1) to compare characteristics of patients treated in psychosomatic day hospitals and inpatient units, (2) to compare the effectiveness of both treatment modalities. METHODS: A naturalistic design was chosen to achieve external validity. 604 consecutive patients were assessed at admission, discharge and a 3-month follow-up. Primary outcome was defined as a reduction of depressive symptomatology (QIDS-C), secondary outcomes comprise overall functioning and quality of life. For a comparison of effectiveness, inpatient and day hospital samples were matched according to known predictors of outcome. RESULTS: The few differences found between the inpatient and day hospital sample were related to severity of depression and physical impairment. Inpatients more often got antidepressant medication. Additionally, inpatients were treated significantly longer, due to a subgroup of patients with somatic co-morbidity. There were no differences when comparing effectiveness. LIMITATIONS: When comparing treatment effectiveness, possible bias cannot be ruled out. There was no randomization or untreated control group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a more severe depression and somatic co-morbidity, inpatient treatment might be preferred as compared to day hospital treatment. However, most patients can be treated in both settings.
