Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 39 Suppl 129(2): 83-87, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33200729

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the autoantibody profile in eosinophilic granulomatosis and polyangiitis (EGPA) patients. METHODS: 33 EGPA patients were tested for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), antinuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-alpha-enolase antibodies, and anti-eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) antibodies. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients and healthy subjects were tested as a control group. RESULTS: Anti-alpha-enolase antibodies were positive in 82% of EGPA patients at high titers. Although a high sensitivity was shown for an anti-alpha-enolase antibody titer above 1/100 (82%), the specificity for EGPA remained low (44%) (AUC=0.653, p=0.008). Anti-alpha-enolase antibodies predominated in males with EGPA (p=0.048) and were associated with skin involvement (p=0.040). Most of the EGPA patients positive for anti-alpha enolase antibodies (20 out of 27) had a negative indirect immunofluorescence test (IFT) for ANCA. ANCA were positive in 8 EGPA patients (24%) with a perinuclear pattern in all but one patient. The ANCA-target antigen was myeloperoxidase (MPO) and/or alpha-enolase. A usually fine-speckled ANA pattern was observed in 42% of the EGPA patients. RF was positive in 1 (6%) of the 18 EGPA patients tested. There was no association between the presence and levels of autoantibodies and EGPA disease activity. None of the patients and controls was positive for anti-EPO antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Alpha-enolase may be a target of autoimmunity in EGPA patients and shows usually negative ANCA IFT results.


Subject(s)
Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis , Microscopic Polyangiitis , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic , Humans , Male , Peroxidase , Phosphopyruvate Hydratase
4.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 56(9): 1533-1541, 2017 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28541581

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this multicentre study was to improve the clinical interpretation of PR3- and MPO-ANCAs as an adjunct for the diagnosis of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) by defining thresholds and test result intervals based on predefined specificities and by calculating test result interval-specific likelihood ratios (LRs). Methods: Eight different PR3- and MPO-ANCA immunoassays from seven companies were evaluated using 251 diagnostic samples from AAV patients and 924 diseased controls. Results: Thresholds for antibody levels were determined based on predefined specificities (95, 97.5, 99 and 100%) and used to delimit test result intervals. Test result interval-specific LRs were determined. For all assays, the LR for AAV increased with increasing antibody level. For all but one immunoassay, high antibodies levels (associated with LR >55) were found in a substantial fraction (>65%) of patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics analysis of a diagnostic approach in which positive results were confirmed by IIF or another immunoassay was not substantially higher than the AUC of performing immunoassay only. The highest AUC was found when immunoassay was combined with another immunoassay or with IIF. Conclusion: To diagnose AAV based on PR3- and MPO-ANCA, it is useful to define thresholds for antibody levels and to assign test result interval-specific LRs. Higher antibody levels are associated with a higher likelihood for disease. Such information improves clinical interpretation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/diagnosis , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic/blood , Myeloblastin/immunology , Peroxidase/immunology , Biomarkers/blood , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Likelihood Functions , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL