Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
N S W Public Health Bull ; 21(9-10): 243-7, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21211478

ABSTRACT

The challenges of maintaining high influenza vaccination rates in health care workers have focused worldwide attention on mandatory measures. In 2007, NSW Health issued a policy directive requiring health care workers to be screened/vaccinated for certain infectious diseases. Annual influenza vaccine continued to be recommended but not required. This paper describes the views of NSW Health administrators and clinical leaders about adding influenza vaccination to the requirements. Of 55 staff interviewed, 45 provided a direct response. Of these, 23 supported inclusion, 14 did not and eight were undecided. Analysis of interviews indicated that successfully adding influenza vaccination to the current policy directive would require four major issues to be addressed: (1) providing and communicating a solid evidence base supporting the policy directive; (2) addressing the concerns of staff about the vaccine; (3) ensuring staff understand the need to protect patients; and (4) addressing the logistical challenges of enforcing an annual vaccination.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Mandatory Programs , Vaccination , Administrative Personnel , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Leadership , New South Wales , Time Factors
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 29(2): 111-5, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18179365

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a pandemic influenza preparedness drill on the rate of influenza vaccination among healthcare workers (HCWs). DESIGN: Before-after intervention trial. SETTING: The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC), a large, academic medical center, during 2005. SUBJECTS: Staff members at UIHC. METHODS: UIHC conducted a pandemic influenza preparedness drill that included a goal of vaccinating a large number of HCWs in 6 days without disrupting patient care. Peer vaccination and mobile vaccination teams were used to vaccinate HCWs, educational tools were distributed to encourage HCWs to be vaccinated, and resources were allocated on the basis of daily vaccination reports. Logit models were used to compare vaccination rates achieved during the 2005 vaccination drill with the vaccination rates achieved during the 2003 vaccination campaign. RESULTS: UIHC vaccinated 54% of HCWs (2,934 of 5,467) who provided direct patient care in 6 days. In 2 additional weeks, this rate increased to 66% (3,625 of 5,467). Overall, 66% of resident physicians (311 of 470) and 63% of nursing staff (1,429 of 2,255) were vaccinated. Vaccination rates in 2005 were significantly higher than the hospitalwide rate of 41% (5,741 of 14,086) in 2003. CONCLUSIONS: UIHC dramatically increased the influenza vaccination rate among HCWs by conducting a pandemic influenza preparedness drill. Additionally, the drill allowed us to conduct a bioemergency drill in a realistic scenario, use innovative methods for vaccine delivery, and secure administrative support for future influenza vaccination campaigns. Our study demonstrates how a drill can be used to improve vaccination rates significantly.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Health Personnel/psychology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Administrative Personnel/psychology , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hospitals, University , Humans , Immunization Programs , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient , Influenza, Human/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Personnel, Hospital/psychology
6.
JAMA ; 290(23): 3122-8, 2003 Dec 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14679275

ABSTRACT

Between late 2000 and the spring of 2003, the United States experienced shortages of vaccines against 8 of 11 preventable diseases in children. In response, the Department of Health and Human Services requested that the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) make recommendations on strengthening the supply of routinely recommended vaccines. The NVAC appointed a Working Group to identify potential causes of vaccine supply shortages, develop strategies to alleviate or prevent shortages, and enlist stakeholders to consider the applicability and feasibility of these strategies. The NVAC concluded that supply disruptions are likely to continue to occur. Strategies to be implemented in the immediate future include expansion of vaccine stockpiles, increased support for regulatory agencies, maintenance and strengthening of liability protections, improved communication among stakeholders, increased availability of public information, and a campaign to emphasize the benefits of vaccination. Strategies requiring further study include evaluation of appropriate financial incentives to manufacturers and streamlining the regulatory process without compromising safety or efficacy.


Subject(s)
Vaccines/supply & distribution , Drug Industry/economics , Drug Industry/standards , Federal Government , United States , Vaccination/standards , Vaccines/economics , Vaccines/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...