Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Neurocrit Care ; 27(1): 68-74, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28054291

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The neurological prognosis of patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is difficult to assess. GFAP is an astrocytic intermediate filament protein released into bloodstream in case of cell death. We performed a prospective study aiming to compare the predictive potential of GFAP after resuscitation to the more widely used biomarker neuron-specific enolase (NSE). METHODS: One hundred patients were included at 48 h (tolerance interval ±12 h) after cardiac arrest. A serum sample was collected immediately after study inclusion. We determined serum levels of GFAP and NSE by means of immunoassays. Primary outcome was the modified Glasgow outcome scale at 4 weeks. Values below four were considered as a poor functional outcome. RESULTS: Median GFAP levels in poor outcome (n = 61) and good outcome (n = 39) patients were 0.03 µg/L (interquartile range 0.01-0.07 µg/L) and 0.02 µg/L (0.01-0.03 µg/L; p = 0.014), respectively. GFAP revealed a sensitivity of 60.7% and a specificity of 66.7% to predict a poor functional outcome. All patients having a GFAP level >0.08 µg/L had a poor functional outcome. For NSE, sensitivity was 44.3% and specificity was 100.0% for predicting a poor outcome. Multivariate regression analysis revealed GFAP, NSE, and the Karnofsky index to be independent predictors of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The release patterns of GFAP and NSE after CPR show differences. GFAP levels above 0.08 µg/L were associated with a poor outcome in all cases, and patients with strongly elevated values (>3 µg/L) consistently had severe brain damage on brain imaging. Both biomarkers independently contribute to outcome prediction after CPR.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein/blood , Heart Arrest/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
2.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 141(5): 317-21, 2016 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26939100

ABSTRACT

Using bedside ultrasound in the emergency room includes point of care sonography (echoscopy) and several protocols (RUSH, FATE, etc.). The aim of these protocols is to evaluate the life threatening emergency care situation without interrupting the clinical work flow. This article also compares the definition of emergency care echocardiography and focused ultrasound of the heart. In addition this article gives an overview about compression sonography of veins. Examples are presented on how to use bedside ultrasound in clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Echocardiography , Emergency Service, Hospital , Point-of-Care Systems , Ultrasonography , Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Cooperative Behavior , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Heart Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Resuscitation , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Workflow , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...