Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 3(8): e0001687, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37619213

ABSTRACT

Though many studies on COVID have been published to date, data on COVID-19 epidemiology, symptoms, risk factors and severity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICS), such as Afghanistan are sparse. To describe clinical characteristics, severity, and outcomes of patients hospitalized in the MSF COVID-19 treatment center (CTC) in Herat, Afghanistan and to assess risk factors associated with severe outcomes. 1113 patients were included in this observational study between June 2020 and April 2022. Descriptive analysis was performed on clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of patients. Univariate description by Cox regression to identify risk factors for an adverse outcome was performed. Adverse outcome was defined as death or transfer to a level 3 intensive care located at another health facility. Finally, factors identified were included in a multivariate Cox survival analysis. A total of 165 patients (14.8%) suffered from a severe disease course, with a median time of 6 days (interquartile range: 2-11 days) from admission to adverse outcome. In our multivariate model, we identified male gender, age over 50, high O2 flow administered during admission, lymphopenia, anemia and O2 saturation < = 93% during the first three days of admission as predictors for a severe disease course (p<0.05). Our analysis concluded in a relatively low rate of adverse outcomes of 14.8%. This is possibly related to the fact that the resources at an MSF-led facility are higher, in terms of human resources as well as supply of drugs and biomedical equipment, including oxygen therapy devices, compared to local hospitals. Predictors for severe disease outcomes were found to be comparable to other settings.

2.
PLoS One ; 12(3): e0165270, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28282377

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has been providing healthcare in Afghanistan since 1981 including specialized health services for trauma patients in Kunduz Trauma Center (KTC) from 2011. On October 3rd, 2015, a US airstrike hit the KTC, killing 42 people including 14 MSF staff. This study aims to demonstrate the impact on healthcare provision, after hospital destruction, by assessing the extent of care provided for trauma and injuries by the MSF KTC and to report on treatment outcomes from January 2014 to June 2015, three months prior to the bombing. METHODS: This is a descriptive, retrospective review of hospital records. All patients with traumatic injuries registered in the Emergency Department (ED) or hospitalized in In-Patients Department (IPD) and/or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of KTC between January 2014 and June 2015 were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 35647 patients were registered in KTC during the study period. 3199 patients registered in the ED were children aged <5 years and 310 of them were admitted including 47 to the ICU. 77.5% patients were from Kunduz province and the remaining were from other provinces. The average length of stay was 7.3 days and 3.3 days while the bed occupancy rate was an average 91.1% and 75.8% in IPD and ICU, respectively. Of 4605 IPD patients, 105 (2.3%) developed complications. Among those admitted to the ICU, 12.6% patients died. About one-third surgical interventions were carried out on an urgent basis and the major proportion (45.8%) of surgical procedures was wound surgery followed by orthopedic surgery (27.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high burden of traumatic injuries in Kunduz province and MSF Trauma Center's contribution to saving lives, preventing disabilities and alleviating suffering among adults and children within the region. The bombing and destruction of KTC has resulted in a specific gap in critical healthcare services for the local communities in the health system of this war-ravaged region. This suggests the urgent need for reconstruction and re-opening of the center.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Afghanistan , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Centers , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Young Adult
3.
Surgery ; 160(5): 1414-1421, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27407057

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: On October 3, 2015, a United States airstrike hit Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) Trauma Centre in Kunduz, Afghanistan. Our aim was to describe the care provided and estimate the health burden averted by surgical care at the hospital. We also report the benefit rendered by the Trauma Centre to the health of the local population prior to its destruction. METHODS: All operations performed in an operating theater at the Trauma Centre from its opening on August 30, 2011, to August 31, 2015, were described. Disability-adjusted life years averted by operative care over the same period were estimated. RESULTS: The Trauma Centre performed 13,970 operations, which included 17,928 procedures for 6,685 patients. The median age of patients who required operative intervention was 21 years (interquartile range 12-34 years). More than 85% of patients were men (12,034 patients; 86%). Of the 6,685 patients who required operative care, 4,387 suffered unintentional, non-violence-related injuries (66%), while 2,276 suffered violence-related injuries (34%). The perioperative death rate at the facility decreased from 7.2 deaths per 1,000 operations in 2011 to 1.3 deaths in 2015 (P = .03). More than 154,250 disability-adjusted life years were averted by operative care (95% confidence interval 153,042-155,465). CONCLUSION: The health burden averted by the surgical care provided at the Trauma Centre was large; it is critically felt by those still living in the region. Access to essential trauma care for all victims of armed conflict is a human right; as directed by International Humanitarian Law, we must guarantee special protection for the wounded, sick, and medical personnel and facilities during war.


Subject(s)
Medical Missions/organization & administration , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Afghanistan , Child , Child, Preschool , Developing Countries , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...