Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pract Midwife ; 16(7): 16-7, 20, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23909197

ABSTRACT

The National Diet and Nutrition Survey (Bates et al 2011) show adult females have low levels of vitamin D. Many women in midwives' care may be vitamin D deficient. The aim of this article is to update midwives' knowledge of vitamin D in line with their statutory role as a midwife, so they can recognise deficiency and make women aware of the consequences for themselves and their baby.


Subject(s)
Midwifery/methods , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Prenatal Care/methods , Vitamin D Deficiency/prevention & control , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Cholecalciferol/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Ergocalciferols/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Nurse's Role , Nutritional Status , Pregnancy , Sunlight , United Kingdom , Vitamin D Deficiency/nursing
2.
Midwifery ; 21(3): 267-77, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16024148

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate women's perceptions of their experiences of vaginal examinations in labour. DESIGN: A prospective, analytic survey design using anonymised, self-completion, postal questionnaires. SETTING: A multi-centre study conducted in 2002 in three midwifery units in Cambridgeshire, England. PARTICIPANTS: An unselected, consecutive sample of 104 primiparae expected to deliver their first baby in hospital after an uneventful pregnancy at 37 weeks or over, with the fetal head presenting, of whom 73 finally took part; the response rate was 70%. FINDINGS: On the basis of a 20-item Likert-type scale, a notional satisfaction index score of 74% was calculated. This was based on 1435 items of ordinal data, suggesting an encouraging measure of contentment with the privacy, dignity, sensitivity, support and frequency with which vaginal examinations in labour were managed. However, there was some scope for improvement in areas such as associated pain, opportunities to refuse examinations and more detailed information-giving. No statistically significant differences in women's perceptions could be demonstrated in the three midwifery units in relation to the numbers of vaginal examinations carried out in labour or the women's perceptions of their care by health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence based on the women's perceptions indicates that 53% of women were more than satisfied with the conduct of their vaginal examinations in labour; a further 44% were satisfied; and the remaining 3% were less than satisfied.


Subject(s)
Labor, Obstetric , Midwifery/standards , Mothers , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Physical Examination , Vagina , Adult , England , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Labor, Obstetric/psychology , Mothers/psychology , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Nurse-Patient Relations , Physical Examination/nursing , Physical Examination/psychology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Research Design , Surveys and Questionnaires , Women's Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...