Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA ; 327(24): 2403-2412, 2022 06 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35665794

ABSTRACT

Importance: Intraoperative handovers of anesthesia care are common. Handovers might improve care by reducing physician fatigue, but there is also an inherent risk of losing critical information. Large observational analyses report associations between handover of anesthesia care and adverse events, including higher mortality. Objective: To determine the effect of handovers of anesthesia care on postoperative morbidity and mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a parallel-group, randomized clinical trial conducted in 12 German centers with patients enrolled between June 2019 and June 2021 (final follow-up, July 31, 2021). Eligible participants had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 3 or 4 and were scheduled for major inpatient surgery expected to last at least 2 hours. Interventions: A total of 1817 participants were randomized to receive either a complete handover to receive anesthesia care by another clinician (n = 908) or no handover of anesthesia care (n = 909). None of the participating institutions used a standardized handover protocol. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a 30-day composite of all-cause mortality, hospital readmission, or serious postoperative complications. There were 19 secondary outcomes, including the components of the primary composite, along with intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. Results: Among 1817 randomized patients, 1772 (98%; mean age, 66 [SD, 12] years; 997 men [56%]; and 1717 [97%] with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 3) completed the trial. The median total duration of anesthesia was 267 minutes (IQR, 206-351 minutes), and the median time from start of anesthesia to first handover was 144 minutes in the handover group (IQR, 105-213 minutes). The composite primary outcome occurred in 268 of 891 patients (30%) in the handover group and in 284 of 881 (33%) in the no handover group (absolute risk difference [RD], -2.5%; 95% CI, -6.8% to 1.9%; odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.10; P = .27). Nineteen of 889 patients (2.1%) in the handover group and 30 of 873 (3.4%) in the no handover group experienced all-cause 30-day mortality (absolute RD, -1.3%; 95% CI, -2.8% to 0.2%; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.10; P = .11); 115 of 888 (13%) vs 136 of 872 (16%) were readmitted to the hospital (absolute RD, -2.7%; 95% CI, -5.9% to 0.6%; OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.05; P = .12); and 195 of 890 (22%) vs 189 of 874 (22%) experienced serious postoperative complications (absolute RD, 0.3%; 95% CI, -3.6% to 4.1%; odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.28; P = .91). None of the 19 prespecified secondary end points differed significantly. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults undergoing extended surgical procedures, there was no significant difference between the patients randomized to receive handover of anesthesia care from one clinician to another, compared with the no handover group, in the composite primary outcome of mortality, readmission, or serious postoperative complications within 30 days. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04016454.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Anesthesiology , Patient Handoff , Aged , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Anesthesia/methods , Anesthesia/statistics & numerical data , Anesthesiology/statistics & numerical data , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Intraoperative Care , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Intraoperative Complications/mortality , Intraoperative Period , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Handoff/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality
2.
PLoS One ; 7(1): e30046, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22253872

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Organ-specific composition of extracellular matrix proteins (ECM) is a determinant of metastatic host organ involvement. The chemokine CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 play important roles in the colonization of human breast cancer cells to their metastatic target organs. In this study, we investigated the effects of chemokine stimulation on adhesion and migration of different human breast cancer cell lines in vivo and in vitro with particular focus on the liver as a major metastatic site in breast cancer. METHODS: Time lapse microscopy, in vitro adhesion and migration assays were performed under CXCL12 stimulation. Activation of small GTPases showed chemokine receptor signalling dependence from ECM components. The initial events of hepatic colonisation of MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were investigated by intravital microscopy of the liver in a rat model and under shRNA inhibition of CXCR4. RESULTS: In vitro, stimulation with CXCL12 induced increased chemotactic cell motility (p<0.05). This effect was dependent on adhesive substrates (type I collagen, fibronectin and laminin) and induced different responses in small GTPases, such as RhoA and Rac-1 activation, and changes in cell morphology. In addition, binding to various ECM components caused redistribution of chemokine receptors at tumour cell surfaces. In vivo, blocking CXCR4 decreased extravasation of highly metastatic MDA-MB-231 cells (p<0.05), but initial cell adhesion within the liver sinusoids was not affected. In contrast, the less metastatic MDA-MB-468 cells showed reduced cell adhesion but similar migration within the hepatic microcirculation. CONCLUSION: Chemokine-induced extravasation of breast cancer cells along specific ECM components appears to be an important regulator but not a rate-limiting factor of their metastatic organ colonization.


Subject(s)
Cell Movement/drug effects , Chemokine CXCL12/pharmacology , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Mammary Neoplasms, Animal/pathology , Receptors, CXCR4/metabolism , Animals , Cell Adhesion/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Membrane/drug effects , Cell Membrane/metabolism , Cluster Analysis , Disease Models, Animal , Enzyme Activation/drug effects , Extracellular Matrix/drug effects , Extracellular Matrix/metabolism , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Integrins/metabolism , Kinetics , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Mammary Neoplasms, Animal/enzymology , Protein Subunits/metabolism , Rats , Signal Transduction/drug effects , rho GTP-Binding Proteins/metabolism
3.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 24(7): 851-8, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19319542

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In metastasis research, modern microscopic techniques shed a new light on the mechanisms of metastatic tumor cell arrest in the microcirculation of potential metastasis target organs. In this study, we differentiated the contribution of mechanical cell arrest, determined as lumen occlusion of liver sinusoids by tumor cells, and specific cell adhesion mediated by integrins for the arrest of human colon cancer cells in rat livers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using in vivo microscopy, the diameters of liver sinusoids of two different rat strains (CD, 250-300 g and RNU, 80-120 g) were determined. Cells (HT-29LMM) were intracardially injected, and the numbers of arrested cells and the rates of sinusoid occluding cells were determined. RESULTS: Mean sinusoid diameter in CD rats was 6.98 +/- 1.42 microm compared to 5.14 +/- 1.11 microm in RNU rats (p < 0.001). The numbers of arrested tumor cells and the rates of extravasated tumor cells did not differ between the two rat strains. Nevertheless, 5 and 30 min after cell injection, 35 +/- 15% and 19 +/- 8% of arrested cells, respectively, appeared lumen occluding in RNU rats and 9 +/- 6% and 3 +/- 3%, respectively, in CD rats (p < 0.05). Despite the higher rates of lumen occlusive cells in RNU rats, inhibition of beta-1 or beta-4 integrins significantly impaired cell arrest by 30-60% in both strains. DISCUSSION: In summary, these results demonstrate that lumen occlusion alone, as determined by in vivo microscopy, is insufficient to establish stable tumor cell arrest of colon carcinoma cells in metastatic target organs and does therefore not rule out the requirement of specific adhesive interactions for tumor cell arrest in the microcirculation.


Subject(s)
Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/pathology , Liver/pathology , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology , Animals , Cell Adhesion , Cell Line, Tumor , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Integrins/metabolism , Male , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
4.
Am J Pathol ; 169(3): 1064-73, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16936278

ABSTRACT

Adhesive and invasive characteristics appear to be crucial for organ-specific metastasis formation. Using intravital microscopy we investigated the relation between the metastatic potential of colon carcinoma cells and their adhesive and invasive behavior during early steps of metastasis within microvasculatures of rat liver, lung, intestine, skin, muscle, spleen, and kidney in vivo. Colon carcinoma cells with low (HT-29P), intermediate (KM-12C), and high (HT-29LMM, KM-12L4) metastatic potential were injected into nude or Sprague-Dawley rats. Initial interactions with host organ microvasculatures were semiquantitatively analyzed throughout 20 to 30 minutes. Circulating cells passed microvessels in all observed organs without size restriction. All cell lines showed high adhesion rates, independent from their metastatic potential, within liver and lung but very rarely in other organs. Diameters of involved microvessels were larger than diameters of adherent tumor cells. Cell extravasation of highly metastatic HT-29LMM and KM-12L4 cells into liver parenchyma was significantly higher compared to low metastatic cells (P<0.05). Our results indicate that colon carcinoma cells can arrest in target organs without size restriction. Cell adhesion of circulating tumor cells occurred in metastatic target organs only, likely attributable to specific interactions. Migration into target organs correlated with their metastatic potential.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms, Experimental/pathology , Animals , Carcinoma/blood , Carcinoma/physiopathology , Cell Adhesion , Colonic Neoplasms/blood , Colonic Neoplasms/physiopathology , Liver Neoplasms/blood , Liver Neoplasms/physiopathology , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/blood , Lung Neoplasms/physiopathology , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasms, Experimental/blood , Neoplasms, Experimental/physiopathology , Organ Specificity , Rats , Rats, Nude , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...