A Snapshot of Chronic Critical Illness in Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

Children with chronic critical illness (CCI) represent the sickest subgroup of children with medical complexity. In this article, we applied a proposed definition of pediatric CCI to assess point prevalence in medical, cardiovascular, and combined pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), screening all patients admitted to six academic medical centers in the United States on May 17, 2017, for pediatric CCI (PCCI) eligibility. We gathered descriptive data to understand medical complexity and resource needs of children with PCCI in PICUs including data regarding hospitalization characteristics, previous admissions, medical technology, and chronic multiorgan dysfunction. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population and hospital data. The study cohort was divided between PICU-prolonged (stay > 14 days) and PICU-exposed (any time in PICU); comparative analyses were conducted. On the study day, 185 children met inclusion criteria, 66 (36%) PICU-prolonged and 119 (64%) PICU-exposed. Nearly all had home medical technology and most ( n = 152; 82%) required mechanical ventilation in the PICU. The PICU-exposed cohort mirrored the PICU-prolonged with a few exceptions as follows: they were older, had fewer procedures and surgeries, and had more recurrent hospitalizations. Most ( n = 44; 66%) of the PICU-prolonged cohort had never been discharged home. Children with PCCI were a sizable proportion of the unit census on the study day. We found that children with PCCI are a prevalent population in PICUs. Dividing the cohorts between PICU-prolonged and PICU-exposed helps to better understand the care needs of the PCCI population. Identifying and studying PCCI, including variables relevant to PICU-prolonged and PICU-exposed, could inform changes to PICU care models and training programs to better enable PICUs to meet their unique needs.

Parent Perspectives on the Child Experience of Pediatric Home Ventilation via Tracheostomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Parents facing the decision of whether to initiate pediatric mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy ("home ventilation") report wanting information about what to expect for life at home for their child. The study objective is to explore parent descriptions of the child experience of home ventilation to increase awareness for clinicians in the inpatient setting caring for these children. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted using purposive sampling of parents with children who initiated home ventilation within the previous 5 years from 3 geographically diverse academic medical centers. RESULTS: We interviewed 21 families from 3 geographic regions in the United States. About 75% of children had respiratory failure in the first year of life, 80% had medical complexity, and half had severe neurologic impairment. Five domains emerged regarding parent perceptions of their child's experience of home ventilation: (1) health and well-being; (2) development; (3) adaptation; (4) mobility and travel; and (5) relationships. Within each domain, several themes were identified. For each theme, there was a positive and negative subtheme to illustrate how the child's experience was modified by home ventilation. Parent descriptions were generally positive, however, in all domains and to varying degrees, parents expressed negative aspects of home ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: By providing information about the realistic experiences of children using home ventilation, clinicians can support families in the inpatient setting as they face this complex decision. Balanced information about home ventilation is critical to enhancing clinician counseling so that families may benefit from the perspectives of experienced parents.

Home values and experiences navigation track (HomeVENT): Supporting decisions about pediatric home ventilation.

Objective: To pilot feasibility and acceptability of HomeVENT, a systematic approach to family-clinician decision-making about pediatric home ventilation. Methods: Parents and clinicians of children facing home ventilation decisions were enrolled at 3 centers using a pre/post cohort design. Family interventions included: 1) a website describing the experiences of families who previously chose for and against home ventilation 2) a Question Prompt List (QPL); 3) in-depth interviews exploring home life and values. Clinician HomeVENT intervention included a structured team meeting reviewing treatment options in light of the family's home life and values. All participants were interviewed one month after the decision. Results: We enrolled 30 families and 34 clinicians. Most Usual Care (14/15) but fewer Intervention (10/15) families elected for home ventilation. Families reported the website helped them consider different treatment options, the QPL promoted discussion within the family and with the team, and the interview helped them realize how home ventilation might change their daily life. Clinicians reported the team meeting helped clarify prognosis and prioritize treatment options. Conclusions: The HomeVENT pilot was feasible and acceptable. Innovation: This systematic approach to pediatric home ventilation decisions prioritizes family values and is a novel method to increase the rigor of shared decision-making in a rushed clinical environment.

Family-Reflections.com: Creating a parent-to-parent web-based tool regarding pediatric home ventilation.

BACKGROUND: The decision to initiate pediatric mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy ("home ventilation") is complex and parents often desire information from other parents who have faced this decision. However, parent-to-parent communication is challenging as it is difficult to connect new families to experienced families in ways that optimize informed, balanced decision-making. OBJECTIVE: Create a parent-to-parent web-based tool to support decision-making about pediatric home ventilation. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT: The tool was created based on interviews and feedback from parents. METHODS: We interviewed parents who previously chose for, or against, home ventilation for their child. Interview themes and family comments guided website development. Viewer feedback was solicited via an embedded survey in the tool. RESULTS: We created 6 composite character families to communicate 6 themes about home ventilation: 1) Considering treatment options, 2) Talking with medical team, 3) Impact on life at home, 4) Impact on relationships, 5) Experience for the child, and 6) If the child's life is short. Nine families who reviewed the draft tool felt it would have helped with their decision about home ventilation. Specifically, it supported families in thinking through what was "most important about their child's breathing problems" (7 of 9 parents) and feeling "more at peace with the decision" (8 of 9 parents). Between 6/1/20-12/31/22, nearly 5500 viewers have accessed the tool and 56 viewers completed the survey (including 13 families and 39 clinicians). Feedback from experienced families and clinicians reported the tool taught them something new. DISCUSSION: This novel parent-to-parent tool shows promise for expanding access to balanced, family-centered information about pediatric home ventilation. PRACTICAL VALUE: The diverse stories and decisions let parents access multiple family perspectives. The tool's focus is on family-centric information that parents reported was usually missing from clinician counseling. FUNDING: This work was supported by the National Palliative Care Research Center.

"What Would Give Her the Best Life?": Understanding Why Families Decline Pediatric Home Ventilation.

Background: Families who must decide about pediatric home ventilation rely on the clinicians who counsel them for guidance. Most studies about pediatric home ventilation decisions focus on families who opt for this intervention, leaving much unknown about the families who decline. Objective: To describe the rationales of families who decline home ventilation. Design: Semi-structured interview study. Setting/Subjects: We interviewed 16 families in hospitals across 3 U.S. states, identified by their clinicians as previously deciding to not pursue home ventilation via tracheostomy within the past five years. Measurements: Targeted content and narrative analyses were used to understand family intentions and reasons for declining. Results: The clinical and social context varied among the 16 families in this study. Families' intentions in saying "no" fell into two categories: (1) definitive "No": Families who stood firm on in their decision and (2) contingent "No": Families who may consider this in the future. Families described four reasons why their child did not receive home ventilation: (1) concern about medical impacts, (2) concern about physical and/or communication restrictions, (3) concern that there would be no clear health benefit, and (4) concern about no clear meaningful life. Most families mentioned all four reasons, but concern about no clear meaningful life predominated. Conclusions: Though these families did not see home ventilation as an appropriate option, each reported a complex interplay of intentions behind and reasons for declining. Clinicians who counsel families about home ventilation could share the reasons that families commonly decline this intervention to facilitate a balanced discussion.

Home mechanical ventilation for children with severe neurological impairment: Parents' perspectives on clinician counselling.

AIM: To retrospectively explore the perspectives of parents of children with severe neurological impairment (SNI), such as those with severe cerebral palsy, epilepsy syndromes, and structural brain differences, on clinician counseling regarding home mechanical ventilation (HMV). METHOD: Inductive thematic analysis was performed on data from telephone interviews with parents who chose for and against HMV for their child with SNI at three academic children's hospitals across the USA. RESULTS: Twenty-six parents/legal guardians of 24 children were interviewed. Fourteen children had static encephalopathy, 11 received HMV, and 20 were alive at the time of parent interviews. Themes included how HMV related to the child's prognosis, risk of death, and integration with goals of care. Although clinicians voiced uncertainty about how HMV would impact their child, parents felt this was coupled with prescriptive/intimidating examples about the child's end of life and judgments about the child's quality of life. INTERPRETATION: While prognositc uncertainty exists, this study suggests that parents of children with SNI seek clinician counseling about HMV that considers their goals of care and views on their child's quality of life.

The Changing Landscape in Pediatric Hospitals: A Multicenter Study of How Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness Impacts NICU Throughput.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric inpatient bed availability is increasingly constrained by the prolonged hospitalizations of children with medical complexity. The sickest of these patients are chronic critically ill and often have protracted intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Numbers and characteristics of infants with chronic critical illness are unclear, which undermines resource planning in ICU's and general pediatric wards. The goal of this study was to describe infants with chronic critical illness at six academic institutions in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Infants admitted to six academic medical centers were screened for chronic, critical illness based on a combination of prolonged and repeated hospitalizations, use of medical technology, and chronic multiorgan involvement. Data regarding patient and hospitalization characteristics were collected. RESULTS: Just over one-third (34.8%) of pediatric inpatients across the six centers who met eligibility criteria for chronic critical illness were <12 months of age. Almost all these infants received medical technology (97.8%) and had multiorgan involvement (94.8%). Eighty-six percent (115/134) had spent time in an ICU during the current hospitalization; 31% were currently in a neonatal ICU, 34% in a pediatric ICU, and 17% in a cardiac ICU. Among infants who had been previously discharged home (n = 55), most had been discharged with medical technology (78.2%) and nearly all were still using that technology during the current readmission. Additional technologies were commonly added during the current hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Advanced strategies are needed to plan for hospital resource allocation for infants with chronic critical illness. These infants' prolonged hospitalizations begin in the neonatal ICU but often transition to other ICUs and general inpatient wards. They are commonly discharged with medical technology which is rarely weaned but often escalated during subsequent hospitalizations. Identification and tracking of these infants, beginning in the neonatal ICU, will help hospitals anticipate and strategize for inpatient bed management. KEY POINTS: · 35% of inpatients with chronic critical illness are infants.. · Nearly 90% of these infants spend some time in an intensive care unit.. · 78% are discharged with medical technology..

Parent perspectives on facilitating decision-making around pediatric home ventilation.

RATIONALE: Deciding about pediatric home ventilation is exceptionally challenging for parents. Understanding the decision-making needs of parents who made different choices for their children could inform clinician counseling that better supports parents' diverse values and goals. OBJECTIVES: To determine how clinicians can meet the decisional needs of parents considering home ventilation using a balanced sample of families who chose for or against intervention. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews of parents who chose for or against home ventilation for their child within the previous 5 years. Parents were recruited from three academic centers across the United States. Interviews focused on parent-clinician communication during decision-making and how clinicians made the process easier or more difficult. Qualitative analysis was used to generate themes and identify key results. RESULTS: Thirty-eight parents were interviewed; 20 chose for and 18 chose against home ventilation. Five themes described their perspectives on how clinicians can facilitate high-quality decision-making: demonstrating dedication to families, effectively managing the medical team, introducing the concept of home ventilation with intention, facilitating meaningful conversation about the treatment options, and supporting and respecting the family's decision. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality decision-making around home ventilation depends on individual clinician actions and the complex operations of large academic settings. Strong working relationships with parents, collaborative alliances with colleagues, and appropriate delivery of key content can help meet the needs of parents considering invasive breathing supports for their children.

Life with pediatric home ventilation: Expectations versus experience.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the family experience of home ventilation through a comparison of anticipated home life changes with subsequent experiences. STUDY DESIGN: Guided interviews with parents across three states who chose home ventilation for their child within the last 5 years. PATIENT-SUBJECT SELECTION: Purposive sampling of parents who chose home ventilation for their child within the last 5 years. METHODS: Interviews were transcribed for qualitative analysis and analyzed for thematic saturation and prevalence of codes. RESULTS: Twenty families were interviewed. Families generally reported not considering potential home life changes when facing the decision about home ventilation; instead, they worried most about medical management. These concerns reversed in importance later. Families learned medical management quickly but felt largely unprepared for the extensive changes to their home life, including isolation, altered relationships with extended family and community, effects on siblings, financial strain, and need for physical changes to their house. Families had not anticipated how much they would be affected by home healthcare as a new part of their life. CONCLUSIONS: The priorities that families consider during decisions about pediatric home ventilation may not be aligned with the actual home experience of this technology. Given that the success of home ventilation largely rests with the family's care, family expectations for home life adaptations must be augmented, as should postdischarge supports for families with complex home care experiences.

Utilitarian Principlism as a Framework for Crisis Healthcare Ethics.

This paper introduces the model of Utilitarian Principlism as a framework for crisis healthcare ethics. In modern Western medicine, during non-crisis times, principlism provides the four guiding principles in biomedical ethics-autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice; autonomy typically emerges as the decisive principle. The physician-patient relationship is a deontological construct in which the physician's primary duty is to the individual patient and the individual patient is paramount. For this reason, we term the non-crisis ethical framework that guides modern medicine Deontological Principlism. During times of crisis, resources become scarce, standards of care become dynamic, and public health ethics move to the forefront. Healthcare providers are forced to work in non-ideal conditions, and interactions with individual patients must be considered in the context of the crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced healthcare to shift to a more utilitarian framework with a greater focus on promoting the health of communities and populations. This paper puts forth the notion of Utilitarian Principlism as a framework for crisis healthcare ethics. We discuss each of the four principles from a utilitarian perspective and use clinical vignettes, based on real cases from the COVID-19 pandemic, for illustrative purposes. We explore how Deontological Principlism and Utilitarian Principlism are two ends of a spectrum, and the implications to healthcare as we emerge from the pandemic.

Family Experiences Deciding For and Against Pediatric Home Ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: To understand what considerations drive family decisions for, and against, pediatric home ventilation. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with parents of children who faced a decision about home ventilation in the previous 5 years at 3 geographically dispersed institutions. RESULTS: In total, 38 families (42 parents) were interviewed; 20 families opted for pediatric home ventilation, and 18 families opted against. Approximately one-quarter of children had isolated chronic lung disease; the remainder had medical complexity that was expected to remain static or decline. Parent perspectives about home ventilation generally reflected whether the child was early, or later, in their disease trajectory. Early on, parents often interpreted prognostic uncertainty as hope and saw home ventilation as a tool permitting time for improvement. For families of children later in their disease course, often already with home technology and home nursing, home ventilation held less possibility for meaningful improvement. Nearly all families experienced the decision as very emotionally distressing. Reflecting back, most families described feeling satisfied with whatever decision they made. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 principal groups of families in our cohort-those with children whose respiratory insufficiency might improve, and those with children facing chronic decline-warrant targeted counseling approaches about initiating home ventilation. The distressing nature of this decision should be anticipated and family supports reinforced.

Living in the Hospital: The Vulnerability of Children with Chronic Critical Illness.

The number of children with chronic critical illness (CCI) is a growing population in the United States. A defining characteristic of this population is a prolonged hospital stay. Our study assessed the proportion of pediatric patients with chronic critical illness in U.S. hospitals at a specific point in time, and identified a subset of children whose hospital stay lasted for months to years. The potential harms of a prolonged hospitalization for children with CCI, which include over treatment, infection, disruption of family life, and the intensive utilization of resources-combined with the moral distress experienced by the clinicians who care for the children, suggest the need for ethical analysis of this growing issue to identify actions that could be taken at the clinical and health systems levels to reduce the harms associated with prolonged hospital stay. In this article we present three real cases from our study that involved a very long hospital stay. We applied a framework developed by Mackenzie, Rogers, and Dodds to analyze inherent, situational, and pathogenic vulnerabilities to examine the ways that interventions intended to remedy one source of harm for the children in our cohort inadvertently created other harms. We examined the complex ways that children with protracted hospitalization are vulnerable to the choices made by their family and clinicians, as well as by healthcare systems and communities. Finally, we used this analysis to summarize actions and ethical responses to this growing patient population. Such an understanding is essential to make clinical and ethical decisions that arise for children who are at risk for a very long stay in the hospital.

Isolation in Parents and Providers of Children With Chronic Critical Illness.

OBJECTIVES: An increasing number of children with medical complexity spend months or more in PICUs, lending to isolation for their parents and providers. We sought to better describe the experiences of parents and providers of children with chronic critical illness specifically around isolation during PICU admission. DESIGN: In-person interviews and surveys of pediatric critical care providers and parents of children with chronic critical illness. Interview transcripts were analyzed for themes. SETTING: Academic institution; PICU. SUBJECTS: Seven PICU physicians, eight nurse practitioners, and 12 parents of children with chronic critical illness. INTERVENTIONS: Surveys and semi-structured interviews. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PICU providers acknowledge feeling medically isolated from children with chronic critical illness, fueled by a lack of chronic critical illness training and burnout. Providers also perceive medical isolation in parents of children with chronic critical illness manifesting as a declining level of parental engagement. Parents did not feel medically isolated in our study. Providers also perceive social isolation in families of children with chronic critical illness, identifying the child's protracted disease and lack of tangible support systems as contributing factors. Parents self-reported adequate social supports but scored high on depression scales suggesting a disconnect between perceived and actual support. Both parents and providers acknowledge that the child's chronic critical illness could be a source of support. CONCLUSIONS: PICU providers perceived social and medical isolation in parents of children with chronic critical illness; however, parents did not endorse either directly. A majority of parents showed signs of depression despite reporting good social support. Providers reported feeling medically isolated from children with chronic critical illness and their families related to burnout and insufficient training. Novel methods to address these issues are needed.

"Stuck in the ICU": Caring for Children With Chronic Critical Illness.

OBJECTIVE: Neonatal ICUs and PICUs increasingly admit patients with chronic critical illness: children whose medical complexity leads to recurrent and prolonged ICU hospitalizations. We interviewed participants who routinely care for children with chronic critical illness to describe their experiences with ICU care for pediatric chronic critical illness. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for themes. SETTING: Stakeholders came from five regions (Seattle, WA; Houston, TX; Jackson, MS; Baltimore, MD; and Philadelphia, PA). SUBJECTS: Fifty-one stakeholders including: 1) interdisciplinary providers (inpatient, outpatient, home care, foster care) with extensive chronic critical illness experience; or 2) parents of children with chronic critical illness. INTERVENTIONS: Telephone or in-person interviews. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Stakeholders identified several key issues and several themes emerged after qualitative analysis. Issues around chronic critical illness patient factors noted that patients are often relocated to the ICU because of their medical needs. During extended ICU stays, these children require longitudinal relationships and developmental stimulation that outstrip ICU capabilities. Family factors can affect care as prolonged ICU experience leads some to disengage from decision-making. Clinician factors noted that parents of children with chronic critical illness are often experts about their child's disease, shifting the typical ICU clinician-parent relationship. Comprehensive care for children with chronic critical illness can become secondary to needs of acutely ill patients. Lastly, with regard to system factors, stakeholders agreed that achieving consistent ICU care goals is difficult for chronic critical illness patients. CONCLUSIONS: ICU care is poorly adapted to pediatric chronic critical illness. Patient, family, clinician, and system factors highlight opportunities for targeted interventions toward improvement in care.

Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness: Reducing Excess Hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVES: The past 2 decades have seen an expanding pediatric population that is chronically critically ill: children with repeated and prolonged hospitalizations and ongoing dependence on technologies to sustain vital functions. Although illness complexity prompts many hospitalizations, our goal with this study was to explore modifiable patient, family, and health system contributions to excess hospital days for children with chronic critical illness (CCI). METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 51 stakeholders known for their CCI expertise. Stakeholders were from 5 metropolitan areas and were either (1) interdisciplinary providers (inpatient and/or outpatient clinicians, home health providers, foster care affiliates, or policy professionals) or (2) parents of children with CCI. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for themes. RESULTS: All stakeholders agreed that homelike settings are ideal care sites for children with CCI, yet in every region these children experience prolonged hospitalizations. The perceived causes of excess hospital days are (1) inadequate communication and coordination within health care teams and between clinicians and families, (2) widespread gaps in qualified pediatric home health services and durable medical equipment providers, (3) inconsistent parent support, and (4) policies that limit pediatric service eligibility, state-supported case management, and nonhospital care sites. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an expanding pediatric population with CCI, we lack an intentional care model to minimize their hospitalizations. In this study, we generate several hypotheses for exploring the potential impact of expanded access to home nursing, robust care coordination, and family and clinician support to reduce hospital days for this population of high health care utilizers.

Defining Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness for Clinical Care, Research, and Policy.

Chronically critically ill pediatric patients represent an emerging population in NICUs and PICUs. Chronic critical illness has been recognized and defined in the adult population, but the same attention has not been systematically applied to pediatrics. This article reviews what is currently known about pediatric chronic critical illness, highlighting the unique aspects of chronic critical illness in infants and children, including specific considerations of prognosis, outcomes, and decision-making. We propose a definition that incorporates NICU versus PICU stays, recurrent ICU admissions, dependence on life-sustaining technology, multiorgan dysfunction, underlying medical complexity, and the developmental implications of congenital versus acquired conditions. We propose a research agenda, highlighting existing knowledge gaps and targeting areas of improvement in clinical care, research, and policy.

Pediatrician Ambiguity in Understanding Palliative Sedation at the End of Life.

CONTEXT: Palliative sedation is a means of relieving intractable symptoms at the end of life, however, guidelines about its use lack consistency. In addition, ethical concerns persist around the practice. There are reports of palliative sedation in the pediatric literature, which highlight various institutional perspectives. OBJECTIVES: This survey of 4786 pediatric providers sought to describe their knowledge of and current practices around pediatric palliative sedation. METHODS: Our survey was administered to pediatricians who care for children at the end of life. The survey assessed agreement with a definition of palliative sedation, as well as thoughts about its alignment with aggressive symptom management. Bivariate analyses using χ2 and analysis of variance were calculated to determine the relationship between responses to closed-ended questions. Open-ended responses were thematically coded by the investigators and reviewed for agreement. RESULTS: Nearly half (48.6%) of the respondents indicated that the stated definition of palliative sedation "completely" reflected their own views. Respondents were split when asked if they viewed any difference between palliative sedation and aggressive symptom management: Yes (46%) versus No (54%). Open-ended responses revealed specifics about the nature of variation in interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Responses point to ambiguity surrounding the concept of palliative sedation. Pediatricians were concerned with a decreased level of consciousness as the goal of palliative sedation. Respondents were split on whether they view palliative sedation as a distinct entity or as one broad continuum of care, equivalent to aggressive symptom management. Institutional-based policies are essential to clarify acceptable practice, enable open communication, and promote further research.

Chronic Critical Illness in Infants and Children: A Speculative Synthesis on Adapting ICU Care to Meet the Needs of Long-Stay Patients.

OBJECTIVES: In this review, we examine features of ICU systems and ICU clinician training that can undermine continuity of communication and longitudinal guidance for decision making for chronically critically ill infants and children. Drawing upon a conceptual model of the dynamic interactions between patients, families, clinicians, and ICU systems, we propose strategies to promote longitudinal decision making and improve communication for infants and children with prolonged ICU stays. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and PubMed from inception to September 2015 for English-language articles relevant to chronic critical illness, particularly of pediatric patients. We also reviewed bibliographies of relevant studies to broaden our search. STUDY SELECTION: Two authors (physicians with experience in pediatric neonatology, critical care, and palliative care) made the final selections. DATA EXTRACTION: We critically reviewed the existing data and models of care to identify strategies for improving ICU care of chronically critically ill children. DATA SYNTHESIS: Utilizing the available data and personal experience, we addressed concerns related to family perspectives, ICU processes, and issues with ICU training that shape longitudinal decision making. CONCLUSIONS: As the number of chronically critically ill infants and children increases, specific communication and decision-making models targeted at this population could improve the feedback between acute, daily ICU decisions and the patient's overall goals of care. Adaptations to ICU systems of care and ICU clinician training will be essential components of this progress.

Medical foster care: what happens when children with medical complexity cannot be cared for by their families?

Medical interventions for life-threatening pediatric conditions often oblige ongoing and complex medical care for survivors. For some children with medical complexity, their caretaking needs outstrip their parents' resources and abilities. When this occurs, the medical foster care system can provide the necessary health care and supervision to permit these children to live outside of hospitals. However, foster children with medical complexity experience extremes of social and medical risk, confounding their prognosis and quality of life beyond that of similar children living with biologic parents. Medical foster parents report inadequate training and preparation, perpetuating these health risks. Further, critical decisions that weigh the benefits and burdens of medical interventions for these children must accommodate complicated relationships involving foster families, caseworkers, biologic families, legal consultants, and clinicians. These variables can delay and undermine coordinated and comprehensive care. To rectify these issues, medical homes and written care plans can promote collaboration between providers, families, and agencies. Pediatricians should receive specialized training to meet the unique needs of this population. National policy and research agendas could target medical and social interventions to reduce the need for medical foster care for children with medical complexity, and to improve its quality for those children who do.