Evaluation of Research Productivity among Academic Glaucoma Specialists using the Relative Citation Ratio.

PURPOSE: To provide relative citation ratio (RCR) benchmark data for the field of glaucoma. DESIGN: Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis. SUBJECTS: Fellowship-trained glaucoma faculty at ACGME-accredited institutions. METHODS: Glaucoma faculty were individually indexed using the NIH iCite website. Publication count, mean RCR score, and weighted RCR score were collected for each author between May and August 2023 and included PubMed-listed articles from 1980 to 2023. Data were compared by gender, career duration, academic rank, and acquisition of a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total number of publications, mean RCR value, weighted RCR value. RESULTS: 526 academic glaucoma specialists from 113 institutions were indexed. These physicians produced highly impactful research with a median publication count of 13 (IQR 4-38), median RCR of 1.41 (IQR 0.97-1.98), and median weighted RCR of 16.89 (4.80-63.39). Academic rank, career duration, and having a PhD were associated with increased publication count, mean RCR, and weighted RCR. Publication count and weighted RCR differed significantly by gender, however, no difference was observed with mean RCR. CONCLUSIONS: Current academic glaucoma specialists have high mean RCR values relative to the NIH standard RCR value of 1. This benchmark data serves as a more accurate gauge of research impact within the glaucoma community and can be used to inform self, institutional, and departmental evaluations. Additionally, the mean RCR may provide an accurate metric for quantifying research productivity among historically underrepresented groups that are disadvantaged by time-dependent factors such as number of publications.

Efficacy of Perioperative Intravenous Dexamethasone on Postoperative Analgesia in Scleral Buckle Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pain is frequently reported following scleral buckle (SB) surgery. This study assessed the efficacy of perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative pain and opioid use following SB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachments undergoing SB or SB and pars plana vitrectomy were randomly assigned to either standard care of postoperative oral acetaminophen and oxycodone/acetaminophen as needed or standard care plus 8 mg single-dose peri-operative intravenous dexamethasone. A questionnaire was administered on postoperative days 0, 1, and 7 to determine visual analog scale 0 to 10 pain score and number of opioid tablets consumed. RESULTS: Mean visual analog scale score and opioid use were significantly lower in the dexamethasone group on postoperative day 0 compared with control (2.76 ± 1.96 vs 5.64 ± 3.40, P = 0.002; 0.41 ± 0.92 vs 1.34 ± 1.43, P = 0.016). The dexamethasone group also demonstrated significantly lower total opioid use (0.97 ± 1.88 vs 3.69 ± 5.32, P = 0.047). No significant differences in pain score or opioid use were observed on days 1 or 7 (P = 0.078; P = 0.311; P = 0.326; P = 0.334). CONCLUSION: Single-dose intravenous dexamethasone following SB can significantly reduce postoperative pain and opioid use. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:238-242.].

Using a Capsular Tension Ring (CTR) Inserter for CTR Explantation in Cases of Posteriorly Dislocated Intraocular Lens-CTR-Capsule Complex.

PURPOSE: Explantation of a dislocated capsular tension ring (CTR) from the vitreous cavity can be challenging, typically requiring a bimanual hand-shake technique or cutting the CTR into segments. We present three cases of dislocated intraocular lens (IOL)-CTR-capsule complexes in which CTRs were explanted efficiently and safely by using a CTR inserter (CTR-I) through a clear corneal incision. METHODS: Retrospective case series. RESULTS: Capsular tension rings were successfully explanted by freeing the eyelet of the CTR from the capsule, engaging it with the CTR-I hook and retracting the CTR into the device's shaft while maintaining the entire IOL-CTR-capsule complex in a safe position behind the iris plane. No complications of the procedure were observed in all three cases. All patients had subsequent uneventful IOL exchange through sutureless scleral fixation during the same surgery. CONCLUSION: The CTR inserter provides a simple and efficient approach to CTR removal from IOL-CTR-capsule complexes dislocated into the vitreous cavity. Greater awareness of this technique among providers is needed.

Evaluation of Research Productivity among Academic Vitreoretinal Surgeons Using the Relative Citation Ratio.

PURPOSE: To provide relative citation ratio (RCR) benchmark data for the field of vitreoretinal surgery. DESIGN: Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis. SUBJECTS: Fellowship-trained vitreoretinal faculty at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited institutions. METHODS: Academic vitreoretinal surgeons were individually indexed using the National Institutes of Health iCite Website. Publication count, mean RCR score, and weighted RCR score were collected for each author between June and July 2022 and included PubMed-listed articles from 1980 to 2022. Data were compared by gender, career duration, academic rank, and acquisition of a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total number of publications, mean RCR value, and weighted RCR value. RESULTS: Our sample consisted of 677 academic vitreoretinal surgeons from 113 institutions. These physicians produced highly impactful research with a median publication count of 30 (interquartile range [IQR], 11-82), median RCR of 1.78 (IQR, 1.09-3.00), and median weighted RCR of 59.83 (14.31-195.78). Academic rank and career duration were associated with increased publication count, mean RCR, and weighted RCR. Publication count and weighted RCR differed significantly by gender; however, no difference was observed with mean RCR. CONCLUSIONS: Current academic vitreoretinal surgeons have high mean RCR values relative to the National Institutes of Health standard RCR value of 1. This benchmark data serves as a more accurate gauge of research impact within the vitreoretinal community and can be used to inform self, institutional, and departmental evaluations. Additionally, the mean RCR may provide an accurate metric for quantifying research productivity among historically underrepresented groups that are disadvantaged by time-dependent factors, such as number of publications. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Evaluation of the Relative Citation Ratio Among Academic Orthopedic Hand Surgeons: A Novel Measure of Research Impact.

Background: Publication metrics such as article citation count and the Hirsch index (h-index) are used to evaluate research productivity among academic faculty. However, these bibliometric indices are not field-normalized and yield inaccurate cross-specialty comparisons. We evaluate the use of the relative citation ratio (RCR), a new field-normalized article-level metric developed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), among academic orthopedic hand surgeons and analyze physician factors associated with RCR values. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using the iCite database. Fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons affiliated with accredited orthopedic surgery residency programs were included. Mean RCR, weighted RCR, and publication count were compared by sex, career duration, academic rank, and presence of additional degrees. Mean RCR represents the total number of citations per year of a publication divided by the average number of citations per year received by NIH-funded papers in the same field. Mean RCR serves as a measure of overall research impact. A value of 1.0 is the NIH-funded field-normalized standard. Weighted RCR is the sum of all article-level RCR scores and represents overall research productivity. Results: A total of 620 academic orthopedic hand surgeons from 164 programs were included. These physicians produced highly impactful research with a median RCR of 1.27 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.86-1.66). Weighted RCR was associated with advanced degree, advanced academic rank, and longer career duration. Conclusions: Fellowship-trained academic orthopedic hand surgeons produce highly impactful research. Our benchmark data can be used to assess grant outcomes, promotion, and continued evaluation of research productivity within the hand surgery community.

Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression Among Medical Students During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: The Covid-19 pandemic is a public health emergency with both physical and mental health risks. Medical students have baseline elevated rates of anxiety, depression and burnout. As such, they may be especially susceptible to the psychological stresses of Covid-19. The current study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of anxiety and depression among United States medical students during the Covid-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional, survey-based study collected demographic data as well as the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively. The survey was administered from April 13, 2020 to April 28, 2020 amidst the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 1,428 students from 40 US medical schools completed the survey. From those surveyed, 30.6% and 24.3% of respondents screened positive for anxiety and depression, respectively. Median GAD-7 scores were higher among females (7.0 vs 5.0, P < .00001), pre-clinical students (7.0 vs 6.0, P < .00004), and those with a friend or relative diagnosed with Covid-19 (7.0 vs 6.0, P=.001). Median PHQ-9 scores were higher among females (6.0 vs 4.0, P < .00001) and pre-clinical students (6.0 vs 4.0, P < .00001). CONCLUSION: When compared to previous medical student studies, these results are 61% higher for anxiety and 70% higher for depression during the Covid-19 era. The current study suggests that there should be a heightened awareness of and sensitivity to student's mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic with certain cohorts at greater potential risk.