Commercial coverage of specialty drugs, 2017-2021.

Health plans guide their enrollees' access to specialty drugs through coverage policies. We examined a set of health plan policies to determine if they have become more or less stringent over time. We did so by comparing the consistency of policies with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label indications. We considered coverage policies for the same 187 specialty drugs issued by 17 large US commercial health plans from 2017 through 2021. Overall, the proportion of policies that were consistent with the FDA label declined from 57.1% in 2017 to 45.1% in 2021; the proportion of policies that were more restrictive than the FDA label increased from 39.5% to 51.7%. The proportion of policies excluding drug coverage remained approximately constant (3.4% in 2017; 3.2% in 2021). Trends in coverage restrictiveness varied across plans. For 13 plans, the proportion of policies with restrictions increased over time, while for 4 plans it declined.

Impact of a diabetes remote monitoring program on medication adherence.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence in diabetes is well documented to be associated with inadequate glycemic control. Through remote blood glucose (BG) monitoring, unlimited test strip and lancet supplies, personal coaching, and online access to clinical information and educational resources, diabetes remote monitoring (DRM) programs may provide a solution. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between patient participation in a DRM solution and adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD). METHODS: A retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using deidentified administrative claims data from a large pharmacy benefit manager. Commercially insured patients aged 18 years or older and having 2 or more 30-day adjusted OAD claims comprised the target sample. Patients enrolled in insurance plans that implemented DRM, who had at least 1 BG check (ever engaged) between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018 (exposure) were matched to patients enrolled in insurance plans that did not implement DRM (nonexposure). After a 1:2 matching on baseline demographics, disease burden proxy, total pharmacy out-of-pocket costs, previous adherence and insulin use, nonexposure group participants were assigned the same first BG check date as their matched DRM participants. Medication adherence measured as proportion of days covered (PDC) in the 365 days following first BG check was examined as a continuous and binary outcome measure (PDC > 80% or adherent vs < 80% or nonadherent). Multivariable linear and logistic regression were conducted to examine differential magnitude in adherence and likelihood of being adherent, respectively. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 6,002 exposure and 12,004 nonexposure group patients. DRM participants who were ever engaged had a 4.5% higher adherence rate (P < 0.001) and 42% higher odds of being adherent (P < 0.001) in the period after engagement compared with non-DRM participants. Sensitivity analyses showed that patients engaged continuously (> 1 BG check per week) for 3, 6, and 12 months had 5.1%, 5.2%, and 6.4% higher adherence rates, respectively (P < 0.001), and 52%, 64%, and 98% higher odds of being adherent, respectively (P < 0.001), compared with non-DRM participants. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings offer evidence that DRM engagement is associated with higher odds of medication adherence. DRM solutions that provide access to glucose test results, personalized coaching, educational resources, and lower testing supply cost can also influence adherence. Our findings have important implications for payers and patients related to improved health outcomes due to higher medication adherence. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided by Express Scripts. Munshi, Amelung, Carter, and Henderson are employed by Express Scripts. James and Shah are employed by Livongo, which provided the DRM solution.

Longitudinal antibiotic prescribing trends among US dental specialists within a pharmacy benefits manager, 2013 through 2015.

BACKGROUND: Reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions (Rxs) is a major quality improvement initiative in the United States. Tracking antibiotic prescribing trends is 1 method of assessing improvement in antibiotic prescribing. The purpose of this study was to assess longitudinal antibiotic prescribing practices among dental specialists. METHODS: This was a retrospective ecological longitudinal trend study. The authors calculated monthly systemic antibiotic Rx counts, and rates per 100,000 beneficiaries, from a pharmacy benefits manager in the United States from 2013 through 2015. The authors calculated average annual antibiotic Rx rates (AARs) for the 3-year study period. The authors used a quasi-Poisson regression model to analyze antibiotic Rx trends. The authors quantified seasonal trends, when present, via peak-to-trough ratios (PTTRs). RESULTS: Dental specialists prescribed 2.4 million antibiotics to the cohort of 38 million insurance beneficiaries during the 3-year study period (AAR = 2,086 Rxs per 100,000 beneficiaries). Oral and maxillofacial surgeons prescribed the most antibiotics (1,172,104 Rxs; AAR = 1,018 Rxs per 100,000 beneficiaries), followed by periodontists (527,038 Rxs; AAR = 457 Rxs per 100,000 beneficiaries), and endodontists (447,362 Rxs; AAR = 388 Rxs per 100,000 beneficiaries). Longitudinal antibiotic prescribing trends were stable among all dental specialties in the regression models (P > .05). The authors observed substantial seasonal variation in antibiotic Rxs in 2 specialties: pediatric dentistry (PTTR, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.25) and orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics (PTTR, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 1.71), with the highest rates of antibiotic Rxs in the spring and winter. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prescribing practices for dental specialists remained stable. The authors observed seasonal trends in 2 specialties. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Public health efforts are needed improve antibiotic prescribing among dental specialties.

Assessment of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing among a large cohort of general dentists in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess dental antibiotic prescribing trends over time, to quantify the number and types of antibiotics dentists prescribe inappropriately, and to estimate the excess health care costs of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing with the use of a large cohort of general dentists in the United States. METHODS: We used a quasi-Poisson regression model to analyze antibiotic prescriptions trends by general dentists between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, with the use of data from Express Scripts Holding Company, a large pharmacy benefits manager. We evaluated antibiotic duration and appropriateness for general dentists. Appropriateness was evaluated by reviewing the antibiotic prescribed and the duration of the prescription. RESULTS: Overall, the number and rate of antibiotic prescriptions prescribed by general dentists remained stable in our cohort. During the 3-year study period, approximately 14% of antibiotic prescriptions were deemed inappropriate, based on the antibiotic prescribed, antibiotic treatment duration, or both indicators. The quasi-Poisson regression model, which adjusted for number of beneficiaries covered, revealed a small but statistically significant decrease in the monthly rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions by 0.32% (95% confidence interval, 0.14% to 0.50%; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall antibiotic prescribing practices among general dentists in this cohort remained stable over time. The rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions by general dentists decreased slightly over time. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: From these authors' definition of appropriate antibiotic prescription choice and duration, inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions are common (14% of all antibiotic prescriptions) among general dentists. Further analyses with the use of chart review, administrative data sets, or other approaches are needed to better evaluate antibiotic prescribing practices among dentists.

Outpatient Antibiotic Prescription Trends in the United States: A National Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVETo characterize trends in outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the United StatesDESIGNRetrospective ecological and temporal trend study evaluating outpatient antibiotic prescriptions from 2013 to 2015SETTINGNational administrative claims data from a pharmacy benefits manager PARTICIPANTS. Prescription pharmacy beneficiaries from Express Scripts Holding CompanyMEASUREMENTSAnnual and seasonal percent change in antibiotic prescriptionsRESULTSApproximately 98 million outpatient antibiotic prescriptions were filled by 39 million insurance beneficiaries during the 3-year study period. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were azithromycin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, ciprofloxacin, and cephalexin. No significant changes in individual or overall annual antibiotic prescribing rates were found during the study period. Significant seasonal variation was observed, with antibiotics being 42% more likely to be prescribed during February than September (peak-to-trough ratio [PTTR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.61). Similar seasonal trends were found for azithromycin (PTTR, 2.46; 95% CI, 2.44-3.47), amoxicillin (PTTR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.42-1.89), and amoxicillin/clavulanate (PTTR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.68-2.29).CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrates that annual national outpatient antibiotic prescribing practices remained unchanged during our study period. Furthermore, seasonal peaks in antibiotics generally used to treat viral upper respiratory tract infections remained unchanged during cold and influenza season. These results suggest that inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics remains widespread, despite the concurrent release of several guideline-based best practices intended to reduce inappropriate antibiotic consumption; however, further research linking national outpatient antibiotic prescriptions to associated medical conditions is needed to confirm these findings.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:584-589.

The Effect of Florida Medicaid's State-Mandated Formulary Provision on Prescription Drug Use and Health Plan Costs in a Medicaid Managed Care Plan.

BACKGROUND: Formulary or preferred drug list (PDL) management is an effective strategy to ensure clinically efficient prescription drug management by managed care organizations (MCOs). Medicaid MCOs participating in Florida's Medicaid program were required to use a state-mandated PDL between May and August 2014. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in prescription drug use and plan costs between a single Florida Medicaid managed care (MMC) health plan that implemented a state-mandated PDL policy on July 1, 2014, and a comparable MMC health plan in another state without a state-mandated PDL, controlling for sociodemographic confounders. METHODS: A retrospective analysis with a pre-post design was conducted using deidentified administrative claims data from a large pharmacy benefit manager. The prepolicy evaluation period was January 1 through June 30, 2014, and the postpolicy period was January 1 through June 30, 2015. Continuously eligible Florida MMC plan members were matched on sociodemographic and health characteristics to their counterparts enrolled in a comparable MMC health plan in another state without a state-mandated formulary. Outcomes were drug use, measured as the number of 30-day adjusted nonspecialty drug prescriptions per member per period, and total drug plan costs per member per period for all drugs, with separate measures for generic and brand drugs. Bivariate comparisons were conducted using t-tests. Employing a difference-in-differences (DID) analytic approach, multivariate negative binomial regression and generalized estimating equation models were used to analyze prescription drug use and costs. RESULTS: The final analytical sample consisted of 18,372 enrollees, evenly divided between the 2 groups. In the postpolicy evaluation period, overall and generic use declined, while brand use increased for members in the Florida health plan. Drug costs, especially for brands, significantly increased for Florida health plan members. No significant changes were observed over the same time period in the control health plan members. DID analyses indicated that the decline in overall drug use was 6% lower (P = 0.020), and the increase in plan costs was 27% higher (P = 0.002) among Florida health plan members compared with control group members. CONCLUSIONS: Members in a Florida Medicaid health plan with a state-mandated PDL saw declines in overall and generic drug use and an increase in drug plan costs. States considering a state-mandated PDL should take into account potential effects of decreased generic drug use and increases in prescription drug plan costs. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided internally by Express Scripts Holding Company. The authors and acknowledged contributors are employees of Express Scripts Holding Company. All authors contributed to the study concept, and study design was provided by Munshi, Mager, and Henderson. Munshi and Mager collected the data, and Munshi provided the statistical analysis. Data interpretation was performed by Munshi, Mager, and Henderson. The manuscript was written by Munshi, Henderson, and Mager and revised by Munshi, Ward, Mischel, and Henderson.

An evaluation of dental antibiotic prescribing practices in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prescribing practices among general dentists and dental specialists in the United States remains poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to compare prescribing practices across dental specialties, evaluate the duration of antibiotics dentists prescribed, and determine variation in antibiotic selection among dentists. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of dental care provider specialties linked to deidentified antibiotic claims data from a large pharmacy benefits manager during the 2015 calendar year. RESULTS: As a group, general dentists and dental specialists were responsible for more than 2.9 million antibiotic prescriptions, higher than levels for several other medical and allied health care provider specialties. Antibiotic treatment duration generally was prolonged and commonly included broad-spectrum agents, such as amoxicillin clavulanate and clindamycin. Although amoxicillin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic among all dental specialties, there was substantial variation among other antibiotics each specialty selected. The most common antibiotic treatment durations were 7 and 10 days. CONCLUSIONS: This study's results demonstrate that dentists frequently prescribe antibiotics for prolonged periods and often use broad-spectrum antibiotics. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the appropriateness of these antibiotic prescribing patterns. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The clinically significant variation in antibiotic selection and treatment duration identified among all dental specialties in this study population implies that further research and guidance into the treatment of dental infections is necessary to improve and standardize antibiotic prescribing practices.

Medication Nonadherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Comorbid Chronic Conditions: Influence of Pharmacy Dispensing Channel.

BACKGROUND: Taking medications as prescribed is imperative for their effectiveness. In populations such as Medicare, where two thirds of Medicare beneficiaries have at least 2 or more chronic conditions requiring treatment with medications and account for more than 90% of Medicare health care spend, examining ways to improve medication adherence in patients with comorbidities is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of pharmacy dispensing channel (home delivery or retail pharmacy) with medication adherence for Medicare patients taking medications with comorbid conditions of diabetes, hypertension, and high blood cholesterol (3 of the top 5 most prevalent conditions), while controlling for various confounders. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using de-identified pharmacy claims data from a large national pharmacy benefits manager between October 2010 and December 2012. Continuously eligible Medicare Part D patients (Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plan and Prescription Drug Plan only) aged 65 years or older who had an antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and antihyperlipidemic prescription claim between October and December 2010 were identified and analyzed over a 2-year period. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between dispensing channel (DC) and medication adherence in calendar year (CY) 2012 controlling for prior adherence behavior (adherence in CY2011), differences in demographics, low-income subsidy status, days supply, disease burden, and drug-use pattern. Patients with a proportion of days covered (PDC) of at least 80% for each of the 3 conditions were considered to be adherent, and patients with PDC less than 80% for each of the 3 conditions were considered to be nonadherent. Patients were assigned to a DC depending on where they filled at least 66.7% of their prescriptions for each of the 3 conditions, and the rest were assigned to a mixed channel group. RESULTS: The final analytical sample consisted of 40,632 patients. The adjusted odds of adherence for patients using home delivery were 1.59 (95% CI = 1.40-1.80) higher compared with patients using retail channels to obtain their prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare Part D patients taking medications for comorbid conditions who used home delivery had a greater likelihood (adjusted) of adherence than patients who filled their antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and antihyperlipidemic prescriptions using retail channels. Managed care stakeholders looking to make informed decisions in a cost-constrained environment to assess, implement, and promote solutions that improve health outcomes should consider the use of home delivery of prescriptions to improve adherence for Medicare Part D patients with comorbid conditions. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided internally by Express Scripts Holding Company. Iyengar, LeFrancois, Henderson, and Rabbitt are employees of Express Scripts. Study concept and design were created by Iyengar and LeFrancois. Iyengar was responsible for acquisition of data, statistical analysis, and interpretation of data. The manuscript was written by Iyengar and LeFrancois and revised by all the authors.

Early Marketplace Enrollees Were Older And Used More Medication Than Later Enrollees; Marketplaces Pooled Risk.

Little is known about the health status of the 7.3 million Americans who enrolled in insurance plans through the Marketplaces established by the Affordable Care Act in 2014. Medication use may provide an early indicator of the health needs and access to care among Marketplace enrollees. We used data from January-September 2014 on more than one million Marketplace enrollees from Express Scripts, the largest pharmacy benefit management company in the United States. We compared the characteristics and medication use between early and late Marketplace enrollees and between all Marketplace enrollees and enrollees with employer-sponsored insurance. Among Marketplace enrollees, we found that those who enrolled earlier (October 2013-February 2014) were older and used more medication than later enrollees. Marketplace enrollees, as a whole, had lower average drug spending and were less likely to use most medication classes than the employer-sponsored comparison group. However, Marketplace enrollees were more likely to use medicines for hepatitis C and particularly for HIV.

Impact of specialty pharmacy on telaprevir-containing 3-drug hepatitis C regimen persistence.

BACKGROUND: Although the recommended treatment of hepatitis C continues to evolve as newer and more effective medications are made available, hepatitis C drug regimens consisting of a 3-drug combination of a protease inhibitor, pegylated interferon, and ribavirin were recommended by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases for the HCV genotype I beginning in 2011. Although more effective than the earlier standard of care, these regimens have complex dosing schedules, prolonged duration, and deleterious side effects. It has been shown that patients tend to discontinue these regimens prematurely. Specialty pharmacies offer specialized care management programs to hepatitis C patients, consisting of such services as regularly scheduled patient counseling, assessing regimen appropriateness, monitoring treatment progress, scheduling refill reminders, and coordinating patient care with prescribers. The use of specialty pharmacies by hepatitis C patients may improve persistence on the 3-drug hepatitis C regimens. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of pharmacy dispensing channel (specialty pharmacy or retail pharmacy) and hepatitis C regimen persistence among patients on a 3-drug hepatitis C regimen containing telaprevir, a widely used hepatitis C protease inhibitor.  METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted using pharmacy claims data from a national pharmacy benefits manager for the period July 2011 to June 2013. Continuously eligible patients who started a new 3-drug regimen containing telaprevir were included in the study and followed for up to 12 months after the index hepatitis C claim. The study outcome was persistence to the 3-drug regimen at treatment week 24 (day 168), representing the completion of an important milestone in the regimen. Patients were defined as persistent if they filled 84 days' supply of telaprevir and 168 days' supply of pegylated interferon and ribavirin each, as required by the regimen protocol. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between dispensing channel and persistence, controlling for differences in demographics, medication burden, out-of-pocket spend per 30-day adjusted hepatitis C prescription, and average days' supply per unadjusted hepatitis C prescription. RESULTS: The final study sample consisted of 1,475 patients-1,182 in the specialty pharmacy group and 293 in the retail pharmacy group. A significantly greater proportion of patients were persistent to the 3-drug hepatitis C regimen containing telaprevir in specialty pharmacy, compared with retail pharmacy (56.0% vs. 39.9%, P less than 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, patients in the specialty pharmacy group had 1.89 times greater odds of being persistent to 3-drug hepatitis C regimens containing telaprevir compared with patients in the retail group (95% CI=1.44-2.48). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who used a specialty pharmacy offering refill reminders, care management, and care coordination with prescribers were significantly more likely to be persistent to 3-drug hepatitis C regimens, compared with patients using a retail pharmacy.

Association between dispensing channel and medication adherence among medicare beneficiaries taking medications to treat diabetes, high blood pressure, or high blood cholesterol.

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence, defined as taking medications as prescribed, is a key component in controlling disease progression and managing chronic illnesses such as diabetes, hypertension, and high blood cholesterol. These diseases constitute 3 of the top 5 most prevalent conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, warranting further attention to find ways to promote better medication adherence. The scientific literature has established the clinical and financial benefits of medication adherence and the role of dispensing channel in impacting adherence to medications. However, a common limitation in channel-adherence studies is the failure to control for healthy adherer effect (HAE), referring to individuals who are likely to engage proactively in activities that improve their adherence. Healthier individuals may choose the home-delivery channel to ensure continuity in their medication regimens and to minimize obstacles to adherence, such as inadequate access, inconvenience, and financial concerns. Thus, better medication adherence in home delivery may reflect healthier patients' predisposition to self-select for home delivery options. To accurately attribute the impact of dispensing channel on adherence, research would need to control for bias from a patient's predisposition to be adherent.  OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of pharmacy dispensing channel (home delivery or retail pharmacy) with medication adherence for Medicare Part D beneficiaries taking medications for diabetes, hypertension, or high blood cholesterol, while controlling for low-income subsidy status, differences in days supply, and prior adherence behavior (PAB) as a way to partly control for HAE. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using de-identified pharmacy claims data from a large national pharmacy benefits manager between October 2010 and December 2012. Continuously eligible Medicare Part D beneficiaries (Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plans participants only) aged 65 years or older who had an antidiabetic, antihypertensive, or antihyperlipidemic prescription claim between October and December 2010, were identified and followed for the next 2 years. Those enrolled in a home delivery auto refill program were excluded from this analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of dispensing channel on medication adherence, controlling for differences in demographics, low-income subsidy status, disease burden, and drug-use pattern. Patients with a proportion of days covered of ≥ 80% were considered to be adherent. The analysis controlled for PAB by using patients' adherence status in the year 2011.  RESULTS: The final analytical samples consisted of 150,389 diabetic patients, 615,618 hypertension patients, and 358,795 high blood cholesterol patients. The adjusted odds of being adherent for beneficiaries using home delivery were 1.25 times higher (CI = 1.20-1.30) for diabetes medications, 1.29 times higher (CI = 1.27-1.32) for hypertension medications, and 1.26 times higher (CI = 1.23-1.29) for high blood cholesterol medications, compared with beneficiaries using retail channels to obtain their prescriptions. PAB was the strongest contributor to the odds of a patient being adherent across all 3 therapy classes, ranging from odds ratio of 4.48 to 8.09.  CONCLUSIONS: After excluding patients who received any prescriptions via home delivery auto refill programs and controlling for PAB, differences in days supply, low-income subsidy status, demographics, and disease burden, Medicare beneficiaries who use home delivery for antidiabetics, antihypertensives, or antihyperlipidemics have a greater likelihood of being adherent than patients who fill their prescriptions at retail. The results of this study provide evidence that where medications are received may impact adherence, even when controlling for PAB. Use of the home delivery dispensing channel may be an effective method to improve adherence for Medicare beneficiaries.

Predicting road test performance in adults with cognitive or visual impairment referred to a Veterans Affairs Medical Center driving clinic.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a screening battery for office-based clinicians that would assist with the prediction of impaired driving performance and deciding who should proceed to road testing in a sample of adults with cognitive or visual deficits. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Driving evaluation clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) in St. Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-seven individuals aged 23 to 91 with diagnoses of cognitive or visual impairment or both referred to an occupational therapy based driving clinic by VAMC providers because of concerns regarding driving safety. MEASUREMENTS: Predictor variables included tests of visual and cognitive functioning and activities of daily living. The major outcome was pass or fail on a standardized performance-based on-road driving test. RESULTS: Thirty percent of the referrals failed the road test. The best predictors of driving performance were the Trail-Making Test Part A and the Mazes Test from the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery. CONCLUSION: Measures of visual search, psychomotor speed, and executive functioning accurately predicted road test performance in a significant number of participants. These brief tests may assist clinicians in deciding who should proceed with a road test in a driver rehabilitation clinic or perhaps to whom it should be recommended to cease driving.

Test acceptability and confidence levels in older adults referred for fitness-to-drive evaluations.

In this study, we examined confidence and face validity or client acceptability of tests used in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center driving clinic. The clinic used evidence-based off-road tests and adopted the Washington University Road Test (WURT) as a performance-based on-road examination. Forty-three clients consented to participate in the study; most were male with an average age of 78.2 years (standard deviation = 12.6). In general, a trend existed toward higher client acceptability of tests adopted from the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (Stern & White, 2003) and the WURT than of other off-road measures. Confidence decreased after administration of the psychometric test battery, yet it increased after the on-road evaluations despite a 47% failure rate in the sample. Additional study is needed on test acceptability because it may have the potential to increase understanding, compliance, or both with driving recommendations. Additional research is also needed to examine client confidence levels and their potential impact on performance during the driving evaluation process.

Concomitant use of antipsychotics and drugs that may prolong the QT interval.

Concomitant use of drugs that prolong the QT interval is a risk factor for torsades de pointes, a ventricular arrhythmia associated with sudden death. This study compared the concomitant use of drugs that may prolong the QT interval ("other QT drugs") among two groups of patients: one that took antipsychotics that may prolong the QT interval (the QT antipsychotic group, n = 1,750) and one that used antipsychotics that do not result in QT prolongation (the non-QT antipsychotic group, n = 1,139). Data were pharmacy claim and eligibility information from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2000, from a research database of a large pharmacy benefit manager. Concomitant use of antipsychotics and other QT drugs was examined for each participant over a 3- to 12-month follow-up period. Results showed that 51% of QT antipsychotic group members used other QT drugs concomitantly for at least 1 day in the follow-up period. Logistic regression indicated that there was no significant difference between the QT antipsychotic and non-QT antipsychotic groups with concomitant use of other QT drugs when potential confounders were controlled ( p = 0.6013). Although female sex is a risk factor for drug-induced torsades de pointes, women were more likely to concomitantly use other QT drugs than men in both the QT (56.2% vs. 43.2%; p < 0.001) and non-QT (53.1% vs. 43.0%;p < 0.001) antipsychotic groups. Findings suggest that the use of other QT drugs is not being minimized among patients taking QT antipsychotics.

Geographic variation in the prevalence of stimulant medication use among children 5 to 14 years old: results from a commercially insured US sample.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate geographic variation in the prevalence of prescription stimulant use and predictors of use among a nationally representative, commercially insured population 5 to 14 years old. METHODS: Prescription claims activity from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999 for a continuously eligible population 5 to 14 years old was evaluated. Age-gender adjusted prevalence rates were estimated for each state. Multivariate logistic regression using hierarchical linear modeling was used to evaluate the impact of age, gender, number of child dependents, and region of the country on stimulant prevalence. The contextual effects of urban or rural residence, median income, percent white, and physician rate per 100 000 residents were also controlled for. RESULTS: The 1-year prevalence of stimulant treatment for the entire study sample was 4.2%. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that stimulant prescription use was positively associated with age, male gender, fewer child dependents, living in higher income communities, and living in communities with greater percent white. Compared with children living in the Western region of the country, children living in the Midwest and South were 1.55 (99% confidence interval: 1.28-1.87) and 1.71 (99% confidence interval: 1.42-2.06) times more likely to consume at least 1 stimulant medication, respectively. Differences in stimulant prevalence across urban and rural residence were also noted. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic variation in the prevalence of stimulant use exists nationally, despite controlling for important predictors of use including age and gender. Possible reasons for the variation are discussed as are calls for additional research.

Retrospective, long-term follow-up study of the effect of a three-tier prescription drug copayment system on pharmaceutical and other medical utilization and costs.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has suggested that 3-tier prescription drug copayment systems produce drug cost savings without affecting the use of other medical services during the first 12 months after implementation. Assessment of such systems with a longer follow-up period has been needed. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effect of a 3-tier copayment system on pharmaceutical and medical utilization and cost for 30 months after implementation in a population of commercially insured, preferred-provider organization members. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental, pre-post with comparison group design that gathered data retrospectively from the claims database of a preferred-provider organization in the Midwestern United States. The intervention group comprised members whose employer switched from a 2-tier (generic/brand copayment) plan to a 3-tier (generic/formulary/nonformulary) plan. The comparison group comprised members whose employer retained the 2-tier plan. Employers did not offer a choice between the 2- and 3-tier plans. Outcome measures included total drug cost; net insurer cost (drug cost minus copayment); number of prescription claims; numbers of office visits, inpatient hospitalizations, and emergency department visits; and rates of continuation with chronic medication therapy. RESULTS: Relative to the comparison group (n=4132), the intervention group (n=3577) showed reduced growth in net cost and lower utilization of third-tier (nonformulary) medications (P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively). The intervention and comparison groups did not differ significantly with respect to numbers of office visits, emergency department visits, or inpatient hospitalizations. Medication continuation rates were lower for the intervention than the comparison group at 6 months for oral contraceptives (P<0.05), but chronic medication therapy continuation rates did not differ significantly at any other time point or for estrogens, antihypertensives, or antihyperlipidemics. CONCLUSION: In the population studied, previous research findings were confirmed over a longer time period.

Prescription use behavior among medicare beneficiaries with capped prescription benefits.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the strategies Medicare beneficiaries adopt to manage their out-of-pocket prescription costs in a prescription drug plan with maximum (.capped.) benefits and to evaluate differences in the likelihood of participating in any one strategy before and after exhaustion of capped prescription benefits. METHODS: Self-administered surveys were mailed to 786 Medicare+Choice members with capped annual prescription drug benefits of 500 dollars or 1,000 dollars. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-one surveys were returned, for a 28% response rate. More than 70% of respondents participated in at least one strategy to manage prescription costs. The most frequently reported strategies included obtaining samples from their physician (45%), reducing spending on food and/or clothing (37%), shopping around at other pharmacies to obtain medications at a lower cost (29%), taking less than the prescribed amount (24%), receiving financial assistance from family or friends (17%), and stopping one or more regular-use medications (15%). More than two thirds of those who participated in at least one strategy participated in 2 or more strategies. While the combinations of strategies suggested prudence on the part of respondents (e.g., obtaining samples, shopping around), a subset of respondents participated in strategies that would be considered less desirable (e.g., stopping medications and taking less than prescribed). Finally, more than 35% indicated that they did not know their cap amount, and 24% did not know whether they had exhausted their benefit in 2000. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the difficulties many Medicare beneficiaries face in managing prescription costs, even those with some coverage for prescription costs. In the design of prescription coverage for the elderly, policy makers should recognize the impact that capped benefits have on member behavior. The apparent high rate of reliance upon prescription drug samples to reduce prescription drug expenditures for many Medicare+Choice members raises the question of whether prescription drug samples may discourage the prescribing of lower-cost therapeutic alternatives.