An evaluation of the customized nasal clip protocol for bilateral cleft lip and palate presurgical infant orthopaedics.

OBJECTIVES: Nasoalveolar moulding (NAM) has resulted in profound outcomes in the treatment of bilateral cleft lip and palate patients, including non-surgical columellar lengthening and nasal moulding. We examine an innovative alternative that is less invasive, yet provides similar results. In this study, we describe a novel approach using the Customized Nasal Clip Protocol (CNCP™) and compare the treatment outcomes of a small cohort of infants with bilateral cleft lip ± palate with published results of the Grayson nasoalveolar moulding protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of six bilateral-cleft-affected patients was evaluated for this study. Standardized frontal and worm's eye view photographs were obtained, and clinical measurements were utilized to garner columellar length measurements and nostril height comparisons. The initial and post-surgical results were statistically compared with a student's t-test (p < .05). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the cohort, which will be described. RESULTS: The resulting columellar length and nostril height increases of the CNCP™ group were comparable to a published cohort of subjects that have undergone nasoalveolar moulding. The nasal changes were found to be significant with a p-value <.01. The CNCP™ cohort also had fewer clinic visits, no complications that led to complete pauses of active treatment, and the benefit of receiving comprehensive treatment that was initiated at their first clinical presentation, in comparison to traditional NAM patients. CONCLUSION: The increase of columellar length and nostril height that resulted from utilizing the CNCP™ in bilateral cleft patients met the treatment goals of presurgical infant orthopaedics, with results on par with published results of NAM. These results, paired with the reduction in patient, family, and provider burden, further support the continued use and development of the CNCP™ for appropriate patient populations.

An Alternative Internal Le Fort I Distractor: Early Results With a New Trans-Nasal Device.

PURPOSE: To report the early experience using a new internal trans-nasal Le Fort I distractor in patients with cleft lip and palate. METHODS: Patients with cleft lip and palate and severe maxillary deficiency, who were treated with the trans-nasal Le Fort I distractor, were retrospectively reviewed. Cephalometric images were evaluated preoperatively and at least 6 months postoperatively. Speech outcomes were measured before and at least 6 months after surgery. Patient experience with the device was documented and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Five male patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (ages 11-19) underwent the maximum advancement allowed by the device (25 mm). Follow-up averaged 2 years. Average SNA changed from 75.5°preoperatively to 84.6°postoperatively. Average ANB angle changed from -2.8° to 7.4°, or a tendency to Class 2 overcorrection. There was an overall increase in upper anterior facial height by 7.5 mm. All patients achieved acceptable postoperative occlusions. Two patients with borderline velopharyngeal function preoperatively developed velopharyngeal insufficiency postoperatively that did not resolve 6 months postoperatively, necessitating further surgery. Families reported ease of turning with minimal discomfort reported by patients. All patients maintained normal mouth opening during and after the distraction phase. Two of the patients developed localized pin site infections after the distraction phase that were treated successfully with oral antibiotics. CONCLUSION: The trans-nasal Le Fort I distractor can be an effective device to advance the deficient maxilla and is well tolerated by patients.

The Protruding Premaxilla: Is Our Current Approach the Right Answer?

BACKGROUND: In bilateral cleft patients, surgeons usually attempt to move the premaxillary segment posteriorly. These patients almost always develop maxillary hypoplasia, rendering our current algorithms questionable. The authors sought to determine if the lateral segments are in an appropriate position to serve as a target for movement of the premaxilla. METHODS: Bilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated at the University of Michigan from 1997 to 2015 were reviewed. Patients with skull radiographs or computed tomography (CT) imaging performed at age 3 or younger were included. Noncleft patients <3 years old seen in the craniofacial clinic during 2015 with negative imaging were included as comparative norms. Sella-nasion-A (SNA), sella-nasion-piriform (SNP), and sella-nasion-posterior nasal spine (SN-PNS) angles were determined in both the cleft patients and the comparative norms. Paired t tests assuming unequal variance were used to compare angles between normal and cleft patients. RESULTS: Eighty-six bilateral cleft patients were identified, and 16 had imaging. Only 7 patients had a CT or skull radiograph. Thirteen noncleft patients with negative imaging were included. The mean SNA angle was 100.8 in cleft patients and 86.1 in noncleft patients (P = 0.002). The mean SNP angle was 62.9 in cleft patients and 71.3 in noncleft patients (P = 0.02). The mean SN-PNS angle was 23.2 in cleft patients and 33.8 in noncleft patients (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the maxilla is deficient early in life with posterior positioning of the lateral segments. Therefore, the lateral segments should not serve as a reference point when treating the premaxilla.

Establishing the diagnostic criteria for eruption disorders based on genetic and clinical data.

INTRODUCTION: Proper diagnosis and management of eruption disturbances remains challenging but is critical to a functional occlusion. The objective of this study was to establish definitive criteria to differentiate and diagnose eruption disorders, specifically primary failure of eruption (PFE) and ankylosis. METHODS: Sixty-four affected persons were placed into 3 cohorts: PFE diagnosed through confirmed PTH1R mutation (n = 11), PFE diagnosed based on clinical criteria (n = 47), and ankylosis diagnosed based on clinical criteria (n = 6). These groups were assessed to identify clinical features that differentiate PFE and ankylosis. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of the subjects in the genetic and clinical PFE cohorts combined (n = 58) and 100% in the genetic PFE cohort had at least 1 infraoccluded first permanent molar. Additionally, a novel functional PTH1R mutation, 1092delG, was identified and linked to PFE in the deciduous dentition. CONCLUSIONS: An infraoccluded, supracrestal first molar is a hallmark of PFE, often involving both arches in the permanent or deciduous dentition, and with unilateral or bilateral affection, infraoccluded second premolar or second molar, and multiple affected adjacent teeth. Our results further suggest that PFE and ankylosis might be clinically indistinguishable without knowledge of prior trauma, treatment history, genetic information, or obliteration of the periodontal ligament space.