Determining the parameter space for effective oxygen depletion for FLASH radiation therapy.

There has been a recent revival of interest in the FLASH effect, after experiments have shown normal tissue sparing capabilities of ultra-high-dose-rate radiation with no compromise on tumour growth restraint. A model has been developed to investigate the relative importance of a number of fundamental parameters considered to be involved in the oxygen depletion paradigm of induced radioresistance. An example eight-dimensional parameter space demonstrates the conditions under which radiation may induce sufficient depletion of oxygen for a diffusion-limited hypoxic cellular response. Initial results support experimental evidence that FLASH sparing is only achieved for dose rates on the order of tens of Gy s-1or higher, for a sufficiently high dose, and only for tissue that is slightly hypoxic at the time of radiation. We show that the FLASH effect is the result of a number of biological, radiochemical and delivery parameters. Also, the threshold dose for a FLASH effect occurring would be more prominent when the parameterisation was optimised to produce the maximum effect. The model provides a framework for further FLASH-related investigation and experimental design. An understanding of the mechanistic interactions producing an optimised FLASH effect is essential for its translation into clinical practice.

Biological Benefits of Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Radiotherapy: Sleeping Beauty Awoken.

FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) is a technology that could modify the way radiotherapy is delivered in the future. This technique involves the ultra-fast delivery of radiotherapy at dose rates several orders of magnitude higher than those currently used in routine clinical practice. This very short time of exposure leads to the striking observation of relative protection of normal tissues that are exposed to FLASH-RT as compared with conventional dose rate radiotherapy. Here we summarise the current knowledge about the FLASH effect and provide a synthesis of the observations that have been reported on various experimental animal models (mice, zebrafish, pig, cats), various organs (lung, gut, brain, skin) and by various groups across 40 years of research. We also propose possible mechanisms for the FLASH effect, as well as possible paths for clinical application.

ICRP Publication 131: Stem cell biology with respect to carcinogenesis aspects of radiological protection.

Current knowledge of stem cell characteristics, maintenance and renewal, evolution with age, location in 'niches', and radiosensitivity to acute and protracted exposures is reviewed regarding haematopoietic tissue, mammary gland, thyroid, digestive tract, lung, skin, and bone. The identity of the target cells for carcinogenesis continues to point to the more primitive and mostly quiescent stem cell population (able to accumulate the protracted sequence of mutations necessary to result in malignancy), and, in a few tissues, to daughter progenitor cells. Several biological processes could contribute to the protection of stem cells from mutation accumulation: (1) accurate DNA repair; (2) rapid induced death of injured stem cells; (3) retention of the intact parental strand during divisions in some tissues so that mutations are passed to the daughter differentiating cells; and (4) stem cell competition, whereby undamaged stem cells outcompete damaged stem cells for residence in the vital niche. DNA repair mainly operates within a few days of irradiation, while stem cell replications and competition require weeks or many months depending on the tissue type. This foundation is used to provide a biological insight to protection issues including the linear-non-threshold and relative risk models, differences in cancer risk between tissues, dose-rate effects, and changes in the risk of radiation carcinogenesis by age at exposure and attained age.

ICRP Publication 131: Stem Cell Biology with Respect to Carcinogenesis Aspects of Radiological Protection.

This report provides a review of stem cells/progenitor cells and their responses to ionising radiation in relation to issues relevant to stochastic effects of radiation that form a major part of the International Commission on Radiological Protection's system of radiological protection. Current information on stem cell characteristics, maintenance and renewal, evolution with age, location in stem cell 'niches', and radiosensitivity to acute and protracted exposures is presented in a series of substantial reviews as annexes concerning haematopoietic tissue, mammary gland, thyroid, digestive tract, lung, skin, and bone. This foundation of knowledge of stem cells is used in the main text of the report to provide a biological insight into issues such as the linear-no-threshold (LNT) model, cancer risk among tissues, dose-rate effects, and changes in the risk of radiation carcinogenesis by age at exposure and attained age. Knowledge of the biology and associated radiation biology of stem cells and progenitor cells is more developed in tissues that renew fairly rapidly, such as haematopoietic tissue, intestinal mucosa, and epidermis, although all the tissues considered here possess stem cell populations. Important features of stem cell maintenance, renewal, and response are the microenvironmental signals operating in the niche residence, for which a well-defined spatial location has been identified in some tissues. The identity of the target cell for carcinogenesis continues to point to the more primitive stem cell population that is mostly quiescent, and hence able to accumulate the protracted sequence of mutations necessary to result in malignancy. In addition, there is some potential for daughter progenitor cells to be target cells in particular cases, such as in haematopoietic tissue and in skin. Several biological processes could contribute to protecting stem cells from mutation accumulation: (a) accurate DNA repair; (b) rapidly induced death of injured stem cells; (c) retention of the DNA parental template strand during divisions in some tissue systems, so that mutations are passed to the daughter differentiating cells and not retained in the parental cell; and (d) stem cell competition, whereby undamaged stem cells outcompete damaged stem cells for residence in the niche. DNA repair mainly occurs within a few days of irradiation, while stem cell competition requires weeks or many months depending on the tissue type. The aforementioned processes may contribute to the differences in carcinogenic radiation risk values between tissues, and may help to explain why a rapidly replicating tissue such as small intestine is less prone to such risk. The processes also provide a mechanistic insight relevant to the LNT model, and the relative and absolute risk models. The radiobiological knowledge also provides a scientific insight into discussions of the dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor currently used in radiological protection guidelines. In addition, the biological information contributes potential reasons for the age-dependent sensitivity to radiation carcinogenesis, including the effects of in-utero exposure.

Threshold doses and circulatory disease risks.

Tissue reactions (deterministic effects) become manifest either early or late after doses above a threshold dose, which is the basis for recommended dose limits for avoiding such effects. Threshold doses have been defined for comparative purposes at 1% incidence of an effect, although the choice of incidence level may be scenario-dependent in practice. Latency time before manifestation is related to cell turnover rates and tissue complexity. In general, threshold doses become lower for longer follow-up times because of the slow progression of injury before manifestation, particularly after lower doses. Radiosensitive individuals may contribute to low threshold doses, which would provide a safety margin for the majority of a population. A threshold dose of 0.5 Gy was proposed for radiation-induced circulatory disease, after acute or chronic exposures, in the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 118. However, more recent meta-analyses of low-dose population studies suggest that, if a linear dose-incidence is assumed, the risk of some types of circulatory disease after doses <0.5 Gy or <10 mGy day(-1) may be positive and similar to that for induced cancer. Animal studies show that doses >2 Gy induce the expression of inflammatory and thrombotic molecules in endothelial cells. This causes progressive loss of capillaries in the heart and leads to reduced perfusion, myocardial cell death, and fibrosis. However, doses <1 Gy inhibit both inflammatory cell adhesion to endothelial cells and the development of atherosclerosis in mice. Different mechanisms of injury at low and high doses preclude the simple extrapolation of risk on a linear-quadratic basis from acute to chronic exposures.

Biphasic and monophasic repair: comparative implications for biologically equivalent dose calculations in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To consider the implications of the use of biphasic rather than monophasic repair in calculations of biologically-equivalent doses for pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervix carcinoma. METHODS: Calculations are presented of pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) doses equivalent to former low-dose-rate (LDR) doses, using biphasic vs monophasic repair kinetics, both for cervical carcinoma and for the organ at risk (OAR), namely the rectum. The linear-quadratic modelling calculations included effects due to varying the dose per PDR cycle, the dose reduction factor for the OAR compared with Point A, the repair kinetics and the source strength. RESULTS: When using the recommended 1 Gy per hourly PDR cycle, different LDR-equivalent PDR rectal doses were calculated depending on the choice of monophasic or biphasic repair kinetics pertaining to the rodent central nervous and skin systems. These differences virtually disappeared when the dose per hourly cycle was increased to 1.7 Gy. This made the LDR-equivalent PDR doses more robust and independent of the choice of repair kinetics and α/ß ratios as a consequence of the described concept of extended equivalence. CONCLUSION: The use of biphasic and monophasic repair kinetics for optimised modelling of the effects on the OAR in PDR brachytherapy suggests that an optimised PDR protocol with the dose per hourly cycle nearest to 1.7 Gy could be used. Hence, the durations of the new PDR treatments would be similar to those of the former LDR treatments and not longer as currently prescribed. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Modelling calculations indicate that equivalent PDR protocols can be developed which are less dependent on the different α/ß ratios and monophasic/biphasic kinetics usually attributed to normal and tumour tissues for treatment of cervical carcinoma.

Radiation biology and radiation protection.

For protection purposes, the biological effects of radiation are separated into stochastic effects (cancer, hereditary effects) presumed to be unicellular in origin, and tissue reactions due to injury in populations of cells. The latter are deterministic effects, renamed 'tissue reactions' in the 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection because of the increasing evidence of the ability to modify responses after irradiation. Tissue reactions become manifest either early or late after doses above a threshold dose, which is the basis for recommended dose limits for avoiding such effects. Latency time before manifestation is related to cell turnover rates, and tissue proliferative and structural organisation. Threshold doses have been defined for practical purposes at 1% incidence of an effect. In general, threshold doses are lower for longer follow-up times because of the slow progression of injury before manifestation. Radiosensitive individuals in the population may contribute to low threshold doses, and in the future, threshold doses may be increased by the use of various biological response modifiers post irradiation for reducing injury. Threshold doses would be expected to be higher for fractionated or protracted doses, unless doses below the threshold dose only cause single-hit-type events that are not modified by repair/recovery phenomena, or if different mechanisms of injury are involved at low and high doses.

ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context.

This report provides a review of early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs with respect to radiation protection. It was instigated following a recommendation in Publication 103 (ICRP, 2007), and it provides updated estimates of 'practical' threshold doses for tissue injury defined at the level of 1% incidence. Estimates are given for morbidity and mortality endpoints in all organ systems following acute, fractionated, or chronic exposure. The organ systems comprise the haematopoietic, immune, reproductive, circulatory, respiratory, musculoskeletal, endocrine, and nervous systems; the digestive and urinary tracts; the skin; and the eye. Particular attention is paid to circulatory disease and cataracts because of recent evidence of higher incidences of injury than expected after lower doses; hence, threshold doses appear to be lower than previously considered. This is largely because of the increasing incidences with increasing times after exposure. In the context of protection, it is the threshold doses for very long follow-up times that are the most relevant for workers and the public; for example, the atomic bomb survivors with 40-50years of follow-up. Radiotherapy data generally apply for shorter follow-up times because of competing causes of death in cancer patients, and hence the risks of radiation-induced circulatory disease at those earlier times are lower. A variety of biological response modifiers have been used to help reduce late reactions in many tissues. These include antioxidants, radical scavengers, inhibitors of apoptosis, anti-inflammatory drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, growth factors, and cytokines. In many cases, these give dose modification factors of 1.1-1.2, and in a few cases 1.5-2, indicating the potential for increasing threshold doses in known exposure cases. In contrast, there are agents that enhance radiation responses, notably other cytotoxic agents such as antimetabolites, alkylating agents, anti-angiogenic drugs, and antibiotics, as well as genetic and comorbidity factors. Most tissues show a sparing effect of dose fractionation, so that total doses for a given endpoint are higher if the dose is fractionated rather than when given as a single dose. However, for reactions manifesting very late after low total doses, particularly for cataracts and circulatory disease, it appears that the rate of dose delivery does not modify the low incidence. This implies that the injury in these cases and at these low dose levels is caused by single-hit irreparable-type events. For these two tissues, a threshold dose of 0.5Gy is proposed herein for practical purposes, irrespective of the rate of dose delivery, and future studies may elucidate this judgement further.

Isoeffective dose: a concept for biological weighting of absorbed dose in proton and heavier-ion therapies.

When reporting radiation therapy procedures, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) recommends specifying absorbed dose at/in all clinically relevant points and/or volumes. In addition, treatment conditions should be reported as completely as possible in order to allow full understanding and interpretation of the treatment prescription. However, the clinical outcome does not only depend on absorbed dose but also on a number of other factors such as dose per fraction, overall treatment time and radiation quality radiation biology effectiveness (RBE). Therefore, weighting factors have to be applied when different types of treatments are to be compared or to be combined. This had led to the concept of 'isoeffective absorbed dose', introduced by ICRU and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The isoeffective dose D(IsoE) is the dose of a treatment carried out under reference conditions producing the same clinical effects on the target volume as those of the actual treatment. It is the product of the total absorbed dose (in gray) used and a weighting factor W(IsoE) (dimensionless): D(IsoE)=D×W(IsoE). In fractionated photon-beam therapy, the dose per fraction and the overall treatment time (in days) are the two main parameters that the radiation oncologist has the freedom to adjust. The weighting factor for an alteration of the dose per fraction is commonly evaluated using the linear-quadratic (α/ß) model. For therapy with protons and heavier ions, radiation quality has to be taken into account. A 'generic proton RBE' of 1.1 for clinical applications is recommended in a joint ICRU-IAEA Report [ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements) and IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). Prescribing, recording and reporting proton-beam therapy. ICRU Report 78, jointly with the IAEA, JICRU, 7(2) Oxford University Press (2007)]. For heavier ions (e.g. carbon ions), the situation is more complex as the RBE values vary markedly with particle type, energy and depth in tissue.

The RBE issues in ion-beam therapy: conclusions of a joint IAEA/ICRU working group regarding quantities and units.

This paper summarises the conclusions of a working group established jointly by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) to address some of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) issues encountered in ion-beam therapy. Special emphasis is put on the selection and definition of the involved quantities and units. The isoeffective dose, as introduced here for radiation therapy applications, is the dose that delivered under reference conditions would produce the same clinical effects as the actual treatment in a given system, all other conditions being identical. It is expressed in Gy. The reference treatment conditions are: photon irradiation, 2 Gy per fraction, 5 daily fractions a week. The isoeffective dose D(IsoE) is the product of the physical quantity absorbed dose D and a weighting factor W(IsoE). W(IsoE) is an inclusive weighting factor that takes into account all factors that could influence the clinical effects like dose per fraction, overall time, radiation quality (RQ), biological system and effects. The numerical value of W(IsoE) is selected by the radiation-oncology team for a given patient (or treatment protocol). It is part of the treatment prescription. Evaluation of the influence of RQ on W(IsoE) raises complex problems because of the clinically significant RBE variations with biological effect (late vs. early) and position in depth in the tissues which is a problem specific to ion-beam therapy. Comparison of the isoeffective dose with the equivalent dose frequently used in proton- and ion-beam therapy is discussed.

Differential radiosensitisation by ZD1839 (Iressa), a highly selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in two related bladder cancer cell lines.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is expressed in a wide variety of epithelial tumours including carcinoma of the bladder. Stimulation of the EGFR pathway is blocked by ZD1839 (Iressa), a highly selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Radical radiotherapy is an established organ sparing treatment option for muscle invasive bladder cancer and this study has explored the possibility for the use of ZD1839 as a radiosensitiser in this scenario. The effect of combination treatment with ZD1839 (0.01 microM) and ionising radiation in the established bladder cancer cell lines MGH-U1 and its radiosensitive mutant clone S40b was measured by clonogenic assays. A highly significant radiosensitising effect was seen in both cell lines (P < 0.001 for MGH-U1 and S40b cell lines). This effect was independent of the concentration of the drug and the duration of exposure prior to treatment with ionising radiation. Cell cycle kinetics of both cell lines was not significantly altered with ZD1839 (0.01 microM) as a single agent. A modest induction of apoptosis was observed with ZD1839 (0.01 microM) as a single agent, but a marked induction was observed with the combination treatment of ZD1839 and ionising radiation. These results suggest a potentially important role for ZD1839 in combination with radiotherapy in the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer.

The importance of DT-diaphorase and hypoxia in the cytotoxicity of RH1 in human breast and non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.

The diaziridiny/benzoquinone RH1 is shortly to enter a phase I clinical trial. The drug was originally designed as a substrate for the enzyme DT-diaphorase (DTD) such that metabolic activation of the drug would lead to toxicity. To evaluate this, we have measured the toxicity of RH1 in a pair of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines of widely differing levels of DTD and in MDA231 breast cancer cells which have been engineered to overexpress DTD. In addition, we have explored the importance of the putative one-electron reductase, P450 reductase, by assessing the toxicity of RH1 in MDA231 cells engineered to overexpress the enzyme. All drug exposures were carried out under hypoxic and aerobic conditions. Those cells with the highest levels of DTD, i.e. D7 versus MDA231 wt and H460 versus H596, are substantially more sensitive to RH1 than the cell lines expressing low DTD activity. Those cells with the lowest levels of DTD activity, i.e. MDA231 wt, R4 and H596, show much greater sensitivity to RH1 under hypoxic conditions compared to aerobic conditions. Finally, overexpression of P450 reductase, i.e. comparing MDA231 wt with R4, has little, if any, impact on the toxicity of RH1 under hypoxic or aerobic conditions. In summary, RH1 can be effective in killing cells containing high levels of DTD and may be useful in treating tumors expressing this enzyme.

Cytotoxicity of the bioreductive agent RH1 and its lack of interaction with radiation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: RH1 is a new bioreductive agent that was developed as a cytotoxic agent with selectivity for tumour cells expressing high levels of the enzyme DT-diaphorase (DTD). The aim of the present study was to investigate the cytotoxicity of RH1 in relation to cellular levels of reducing enzymes and any interaction of RH1 with ionizing radiation under oxic and hypoxic conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The MB-MDA231 human breast cancer cell line (WT) and WT cells transfected with the NQO1 gene encoding DTD (the D7 cell line) were used to examine the dependency of RH1's cytotoxicity on cellular DTD activity. The role of the 1-electron reducing enzyme P450 reductase was also studied using a P450 reductase-transfected isogenic cell line (R4). A clonogenic assay was used to investigate the cytotoxicity of RH1 with and without irradiation in air and in nitrogen. In all cases drug exposure was for 3 h. RESULTS: DTD levels were around 300-fold higher in D7 compared to WT and R4 cells. RH1 was cytotoxic at nanomolar concentrations to all the cell lines, and was 2-3 times more toxic in the D7 cells with high DTD than in the other two cell lines. Doses of RH1 was around 2-fold more effective in hypoxic than in oxic WT cells, but not by as much in D7 cells. RH1 did not radiosensitise the cells but showed an additive effect when combined with irradiation under oxic and hypoxic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: RH1 shows high clonogenic cytotoxicity to MDA231 cells with high DTD activity but its selectivity based on the presence of DTD is much less than as shown in previous reports. RH1 showed an additive cell killing effect when combined with irradiation under both oxic and hypoxic conditions.

An evaluation of gemcitabines differential radiosensitising effect in related bladder cancer cell lines.

The aim of this study was to establish the radiosensitising properties of gemcitabine in a pair of related bladder tumour cell lines with differential radiosensitivity. The radioresistant bladder tumour cell line MGH-U1 and its radiosensitive mutant clone, S40b (both p53 mutant), had SF(2) values (surviving fraction at 2 Gy) of 0.98 and 0.64, respectively (P<0.001). Colony-forming assays showed that at 0.01 microM gemcitabine radiosensitisation occurred only in the S40b cell line (dose-modifying factor (DMF)=1.4). At 0.3 microM (killing 50% of cells), both cell lines were radiosensitised; DMF=2.25 and 1.2 for MGH-U1 and S40b, respectively. These data suggest that gemcitabine is an effective radiosensitiser in bladder cancer cell lines, with greater sensitisation in the radioresistant parental line-a feature that should be useful in a clinical setting.

Intestinal crypt clonogens: a new interpretation of radiation survival curve shape and clonogenic cell number.

Estimates of the clonogen content (number of microcolony-forming cells) of murine intestinal crypts using microcolony assays show an apparent dependence on the radiation dose used in the assay of clonogen content. Crypt radiation survival curves often show increased curvature beyond that expected on the basis of the conventional linear-quadratic model. A novel form of crypt survival curve shape is proposed based on two contributory mechanisms of crypt killing. Six previously published sets of microcolony data were re-analysed using a dual-kill model, where target cells are killed by two contributory mechanisms, each described by a linear-quadratic function of dose. The data were analysed as two series--high-dose rate and low-dose rate irradiation. The data were fitted to the models using direct maximization of a quasi-likelihood, explicitly allowing for overdispersion. The dual-kill model can reproduce both the apparent dose-dependence of the clonogen estimates and the high-dose curvature of the dose-response curves. For both series of data the model was a significantly better fit to the data than the standard linear-quadratic model, with no evidence of any systematic lack of fit. The parameters of the clonogenic cell component of the model are consistent with other studies that suggest a low clonogen number (somewhat less than five) per crypt. The model implies that there is a secondary mechanism decreasing clonogen survival, and hence increasing clonogen number estimates, at high doses. The mechanisms underlying the modification of the dose-response are unclear, and the implied mechanisms of, for example, slow growth, induced either directly in the surviving cells or indirectly through stromal injury or bystander effects are only speculative. Nevertheless, the model fits the data well, demonstrating that there is greater kill at high doses in these experimental series than would be expected from the conventional linear-quadratic model. This alternative model, or another model with similar behaviour, needs to be considered when analysing in detail and interpreting microcolony data as a function of dose. The implied low number of < or = 5 of these regenerative and relatively radioresistant clonogenic cells is distinct from a similar number of much more radiosensitive precursor stem cells which undergo early apoptosis after doses around 1 Gy.

Effect of expression of the Escherichia coli nth gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the toxicity of ionizing radiation and hydrogen peroxide.

PURPOSE: To examine the contribution of endonuclease III (Nth)-repairable lesions to the cytotoxicity of ionizing radiation (IR) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A selectable expression vector containing the E. coli nth gene was transformed into two different wild-type strains (7799-4B and YNN-27) as well as one rad52 mutant strain (C5-6). Nth expression was verified by Western analysis. Colony-forming assay was used to determine the sensitivity to IR and H2O2 in both stationary and exponentially growing cells. RESULTS: The pADHnth-transformed wild-type (77994B) strain was considerably more resistant than vector-only transformants to the toxic effects of IR, in both stationary and exponential growth phases, although this was not the case in another wild-type strain (YNN-27). In contrast, there were no significant effects of nth expression on the sensitivity of the wild-type cells to H2O2. Moreover, nth expression caused no effects on the H2O2 sensitivity in the rad52 mutant cells, but it led to a slight increase in sensitivity in these cells following IR, particularly at the highest dose levels used. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst other damage-processing systems may play a role, DNA lesions that are substrates for Nth can also make a contribution to the toxic effects of IR in certain wild-type yeast. Hence, DNA double-strand breaks should not be considered the sole lethal lesions following IR exposure.

Role of damage-sensing/processing genes in the radiation response of haemopoietic in vitro colony-forming cells.

PURPOSE: To characterize the role of various cellular damagesensing, processing and survival genes in the in-vitro radiosensitivity of haemopoietic colony-forming cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone marrow cells from a range of different gene-knockout mice were irradiated in vitro with graded radiation doses and assayed for colony-forming efficiency. RESULTS: Colony-forming efficiency in the nulls was often lower by up to threefold compared with the wild-types. This was noticeable in particular for the atm, bax and p21 nulls. Radiosensitivity was markedly increased in the scid mouse (about 2.3-fold), more than in the atm null mouse (about 1.7-fold). There was resistance in the p53 nulls compared with the wild-types, using two different background strains, that gave similar results. There was slight sensitization in the p21 nulls. In the bcl-2 nulls, there was sensitization at low dose, but not at high dose. In contrast, in the bax nulls, there was protection at low dose, but again not at high dose. The heterozygotes for p53, bcl-2 and bax responded similarly to the wild types, so that no gene dosage effects were identified. CONCLUSIONS: These studies are the first to elucidate the role of as many as six relevant genes in the radiosensitivity of a single cell type. They show the greater importance of 'survival' genes at lower cytotoxic doses of radiation compared with the greater importance of 'damage-sensing' genes at higher doses.

Development of a novel rapid assay to assess the fidelity of DNA double-strand-break repair in human tumour cells.

Cellular survival following ionising radiation-mediated damage is primarily a function of the ability to successfully detect and repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Previous studies have demonstrated that radiosensitivity, determined as a reduction in colony forming ability in vitro, may be related to the incorrect repair (misrepair) of DSBs. The novel rapid dual fluorescence (RDF) assay is a plasmid-based reporter system that rapidly assesses the correct rejoining of a restriction-enzyme produced DSBs within transfected cells. We have utilised this novel assay to determine the fidelity of DSB repair in the prostate tumour cell line LNCaP, the bladder tumour cell line MGH-U1 and a radiosensitive subclone S40b. The two bladder cell lines have been shown in previous studies to differ in their ability to correctly repair plasmids containing a single DSB. Using the RDF assay we found that a substantial portion of LNCaP cells [80.4 +/- 5.3(standard error)%] failed to reconstitute reporter gene expression; however, there was little difference in this measure of DSB repair fidelity between the two bladder cell lines (48.3 +/- 3.5% for MGH-U1; 39.9 +/- 8.2% for S40b). The RDF assay has potential to be developed to study the relationship between DSB repair fidelity and radiosensitivity as well as the mechanisms associated with this type of repair defect.

Practical methods for compensating for missed treatment days in radiotherapy, with particular reference to head and neck schedules.

Unscheduled interruption of a radiotherapy treatment can lead to significant loss in local tumour control, particularly in tumours that repopulate rapidly. General guidelines for dealing with such treatment gaps have been issued by the Royal College of Radiologists and more specific advice on the use of compensation methods has been published previously [Hendry et al., Clin Oncol 1996;8:297-307; Slevin et al., Radiother Oncol 1992;24:215-220]. This article further elaborates on the practical application of these methods. It sets out the main considerations arising in the especially critical case of head and neck treatments and simple calculations are used to illustrate the approaches which may be adapted for particular situations. Radiobiological parameter values are suggested for use in the calculations, but these may require modification in the light of further research in this important area.