ABSTRACT
Behçet's syndrome (BS, synonym: Behçet's disease, or Adamantiades-Behçet's disease, ABD) is classified as a vasculitis of variable vessel size and can manifest itself in both arterial and venous vessels. Its extensive and at the same time interindividually very different clinical picture is not uncommon a challenge, both with regard to the diagnosis of this rheumatic systemic disease, which is rather rare in our latitudes, and its therapeutic options. In addition to the four cardinal symptoms of recurrent oral aphthae, genital aphthae, skin and eye lesions, the clinical picture offers numerous other manifestations which often require interdisciplinary cooperation. In addition to the above mentioned ocular involvement, which can still lead to blindness if inadequately treated, this is especially true for intestinal and cerebral manifestations as well as for large vessel vasculitis.A final revision of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of Behcet's syndrome (EULAR) was made in 2018, and the recommendations are now established internationally as an important treatment guide. Therapy is based on the leading organ involvement. After adalimumab received approval for the treatment of posterior ocular involvement in 2016, another agent, apremilast, became available in 2020. The drug is recommended for the treatment of recurrent oral aphthae in adult Behçet's patients requiring systemic therapy. Nevertheless, there is a further need for new drugs.This article aims to highlight recent findings in the areas of epidemiology, immunopathogenesis & genetics, clinical findings, and therapy, with an emphasis on clinical relevance.
Subject(s)
Behcet Syndrome , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Behcet Syndrome/diagnosis , Behcet Syndrome/therapy , Behcet Syndrome/drug therapy , Humans , Thalidomide/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Intersectoral CollaborationABSTRACT
Behçet's syndrome (BS, synonym: Behçet's disease, or Adamantiades-Behçet's disease, ABD) is classified as a vasculitis of variable vessel size and can manifest itself in both arterial and venous vessels. Its extensive and at the same time interindividually very different clinical picture is not uncommon a challenge, both with regard to the diagnosis of this rheumatic systemic disease, which is rather rare in our latitudes, and its therapeutic options. In addition to the four cardinal symptoms of recurrent oral aphthae, genital aphthae, skin and eye lesions, the clinical picture offers numerous other manifestations which often require interdisciplinary cooperation. In addition to the above mentioned ocular involvement, which can still lead to blindness if inadequately treated, this is especially true for intestinal and cerebral manifestations as well as for large vessel vasculitis.A final revision of the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the management of Behcet's syndrome (EULAR) was made in 2018, and the recommendations are now established internationally as an important treatment guide. Therapy is based on the leading organ involvement. After adalimumab received approval for the treatment of posterior ocular involvement in 2016, another agent, apremilast, became available in 2020. The drug is recommended for the treatment of recurrent oral aphthae in adult Behçet's patients requiring systemic therapy. Nevertheless, there is a further need for new drugs.This article aims to highlight recent findings in the areas of epidemiology, immunopathogenesis & genetics, clinical findings, and therapy, with an emphasis on clinical relevance.
Subject(s)
Behcet Syndrome , Rheumatic Diseases , Stomatitis, Aphthous , Vasculitis , Adult , Humans , Behcet Syndrome/diagnosis , Behcet Syndrome/therapy , Arteries , BlindnessABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Behçet's disease (BD) as systemic vasculitis of unknown etiology is associated with HLA-B*51 in European and Asian populations. HLA-A*26 was claimed as an additional BD susceptibility marker in Japanese and Greek patients. This study was performed to test for HLA associations in HLA-B*51 negative German and Turkish BD populations. METHODS: In total, 65 German and 46 Turkish patients lacking HLA-B*51 were analyzed in comparison to healthy HLA-B*51 negative Germans (n = 1500) and Turks (n = 130). HLA-A/B genotypes were determined by SSOP. P-values with correction for multiple testing (p(c)), χ2-test and odds ratio (OR) were used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: HLA-A*26 was significantly more frequent in HLA-B*51- German patients [p(c) = 0.0076, OR = 3.23, 95% CI 1.63 to 6.39] than in respective controls. HLA-A*26 was also elevated in a smaller group of Turkish patients versus the controls. Significant association of HLA-Bw4 with isoleucine at amino-acid position 80 (HLA-Bw4-80I) was found in the HLA-B*51(-) German cohort of BD patients [p(c) = 0.0042, OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.93) and in the Turkish patients in comparison to the respective controls [p = 0.025, OR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.31]. On the contrary, HLA-Bw4-80 T was reduced in both HLA-B*51(-) BD patient cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows a significant association of HLA-Bw4-80I present on HLA-B*51 as well as on other B-locus molecules with BD. This indicates that distinctive Bw4 epitopes on HLA-B locus molecules could play a role in BD pathogenesis. The study also indicates an association with HLA-A*26 in German and Turkish BD patients as a genetic risk factor independent of HLA-B*51.
