Effect of pre-operative expectations on the outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty.

AIMS: Few studies have evaluated the relationship between patients' pre-operative expectations and the outcome of orthopaedic procedures. Our aim was to determine the effect of expectations on the outcome after primary anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We hypothesised that patients with greater expectations would have better outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing primary anatomical TSA completed the Hospital for Special Surgery's Shoulder Expectations Survey pre-operatively. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS), Short-Form-36 (SF-36), and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, fatigue, and general health scores were also collected pre-operatively and two years post-operatively. Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship between the number of expectations and the outcomes. Differences in outcomes between those with higher and lower levels of expectations for each expectation were assessed by independent samples t-test. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to control for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were evaluated two years post-operatively. Most parameters of outcome improved significantly from baseline and most patients were satisfied. A greater number of expectations was associated with a significantly greater improvement in the ASES score (p = 0.02). In the multivariable analysis, a greater number of expectations was an independent predictor of better ASES, VAS and SF-36 scores, as well as improvements in ASES and VAS pain scores (p < 0.05). Greater expectations for many specific expectation questions were significantly associated with better outcomes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TSA is a successful procedure with significant improvements in outcome, and greater pre-operative expectations are associated with better outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1190-6.

High dietary fat and the development of osteoarthritis in a rabbit model.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is associated with obesity, although this relationship remains unclear. Proposed etiologies of OA in obesity include mechanical loading of malaligned joints and possible toxicity of dietary fat. The hypothesis tested in the present study was that increased dietary fat worsens OA in both malaligned and normal joints, detected by biochemical and histological cartilage markers. METHOD: 83 New Zealand white rabbits were divided among two conditions related to OA: bowing of the knee and a 14%kcal vs 47.8%kcal fat diet. Rabbit weights and knee angles were compared throughout the experiment. At 28 and 38 weeks, intra-articular forces were measured, animals sacrificed, and knee cartilage examined for histological changes, glycosaminoglycan content, 35S uptake, and aggrecanase-1 expression. RESULTS: There were no differences in animal weights or intra-articular forces between the two diets. Despite increased fat content in their diet, animals on the 47.8%kcal fat diet did not gain excess weight. Representative histology showed atypical shearing of articular cartilage among animals on the high fat diet. Animals on the 47.8%kcal fat diet had suppression of protein synthesis compared to the 14%kcal fat diet: lower glycosaminoglycan content and aggrecanase-1 expression in all knee compartments at both times, and lower 35S uptake at 38 weeks. CONCLUSION: These results suggest dietary fat, independent of animal weight, results in altered chondrocyte function. Increased dietary fat was associated with changes in rabbit cartilage in vivo and appears to be a risk factor for the development of OA.