Behavioral Effects of a Chemorepellent Receptor Knockout Mutation in Tetrahymena thermophila.

A conditioned supernatant from Tetrahymena thermophila contains a powerful chemorepellent for wild-type cells, and a gene called G37 is required for this response. This is the first genomic identification of a chemorepellent receptor in any eukaryotic unicellular organism. This conditioned supernatant factor (CSF) is small (<1 kDa), and its repellent effect is resistant to boiling, protease treatment, and nuclease digestion. External BAPTA eliminated the CSF response, suggesting that Ca2+ entry is required for the classical avoiding reactions (AR) used for chemorepulsion. A macronuclear G37 gene knockout (G37-KO) mutant is both nonresponsive to the CSF and overresponsive to other repellents such as quinine, lysozyme, GTP, and high potassium concentrations. All of these mutant phenotypes were reversed by overexpression of the wild-type G37 gene in a G37 overexpression mutant. Overexpression of G37 in the wild type caused increased responsiveness to the CSF and underresponsiveness to high K+ concentrations. Behavioral adaptation (by prolonged exposure to the CSF) caused decreases in responsiveness to all of the stimuli used in the wild type and the overexpression mutant but not in the G37-KO mutant. We propose that the constant presence of the CSF causes a decreased basal excitability of the wild type due to chemosensory adaptation through G37 and that all of the G37-KO phenotypes are due to an inability to detect the CSF. Therefore, the G37 protein may be the CSF receptor. The physiological role of these G37-mediated responses may be to both moderate basal excitability and detect the CSF as an indicator of high cell density growth. IMPORTANCE Although many single-cell eukaryotes have served as classical model systems for chemosensory studies for decades, the major emphasis has been on chemoattraction and no chemorepellent receptor gene has been identified in any unicellular eukaryote. This is the first description of a gene that codes for a chemorepellent receptor in any protozoan. Integration of both depolarizing chemorepellent pathways and hyperpolarizing chemoattractant pathways is as important to chemoresponses of motile unicells as excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitter pathways are to neurons. Therefore, both chemoattractant and chemorepellent pathways should be represented in a useful unicellular model system. Tetrahymena cells provide such a model system because simple behavioral bioassays, gene knockouts, biochemical analysis, and other approaches can be used with these eukaryotic model cells. This work can contribute to the basic understanding of unicellular sensory responses and provide insights into the evolution of chemoreceptors and possible chemorepellent approaches for preventing infections by some pathogenic protozoa.

Behavioral bioassays and their uses in Tetrahymena.

The swimming behaviors of Tetrahymena can be used in sensitive behavioral bioassays for estimating the effects of drugs, mutations, and other conditions on the physiological state of the cell. These assays can be used in both forward and reverse genetic approaches to help understand cellular functions from genotype to phenotype.

A knockout mutation of a constitutive GPCR in Tetrahymena decreases both G-protein activity and chemoattraction.

Although G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a common element in many chemosensory transduction pathways in eukaryotic cells, no GPCR or regulated G-protein activity has yet been shown in any ciliate. To study the possible role for a GPCR in the chemoresponses of the ciliate Tetrahymena, we have generated a number of macronuclear gene knockouts of putative GPCRs found in the Tetrahymena Genome database. One of these knockout mutants, called G6, is a complete knockout of a gene that we call GPCR6 (TTHERM_00925490). Based on sequence comparisons, the Gpcr6p protein belongs to the Rhodopsin Family of GPCRs. Notably, Gpcr6p shares highest amino acid sequence homologies to GPCRs from Paramecium and several plants. One of the phenotypes of the G6 mutant is a decreased responsiveness to the depolarizing ions Ba²âº and K⁺, suggesting a decrease in basal excitability (decrease in Ca²âº channel activity). The other major phenotype of G6 is a loss of chemoattraction to lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and proteose peptone (PP), two known chemoattractants in Tetrahymena. Using microsomal [³5S]GTPγS binding assays, we found that wild-type (CU427) have a prominent basal G-protein activity. This activity is decreased to the same level by pertussis toxin (a G-protein inhibitor), addition of chemoattractants, or the G6 mutant. Since the basal G-protein activity is decreased by the GPCR6 knockout, it is likely that this gene codes for a constitutively active GPCR in Tetrahymena. We propose that chemoattractants like LPA and PP cause attraction in Tetrahymena by decreasing the basal G-protein stimulating activity of Gpcr6p. This leads to decreased excitability in wild-type and longer runs of smooth forward swimming (less interrupted by direction changes) towards the attractant. Therefore, these attractants may work as inverse agonists through the constitutively active Gpcr6p coupled to a pertussis-sensitive G-protein.

Chemoattraction to lysophosphatidic acid does not require a change in membrane potential in Tetrahymena thermophila.

LPA (lysophosphatidic acid), a known chemoattractant for many types of eukaryotic cells, is also a reliable chemoattractant for Tetrahymena. Since LPA receptors are GPCRs (G-protein coupled receptors) in many cell types and several putative GPCR sequences can be found in the Tetrahymena Genome Database, we are interested to determine whether similar GPCR pathways can be used for chemosensory transduction in Tetrahymena. To confirm our procedures, we tested the known chemoattractant proteose peptone (at 1.0 mg/ml), which caused hyperpolarization and increased forward swimming speed in Tetrahymena, consistent with the current model for ciliate chemoattraction. Although 10 µM LPA did not produce these same responses, it was still an effective chemoattractant. PTX (pertussis toxin) blocked attraction to both of these compounds, suggesting a possible G-protein involvement in chemoattraction. Both of these chemoattractants also decreased the basal percent of cells showing direction changes [PDC (percent directional change)] and the duration of backward swimming in 0.5 mM Ba2+ (a general excitability assay). LPA probably causes chemoattraction in Tetrahymena by decreasing the basal PDC without changing either membrane potential or swim speed. Since a pertussis-sensitive G-protein might modulate the ciliate voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, we propose that LPA acts through an uncharacterized GPCR to lower the PDC by decreasing cellular excitability. These combined behavioural and electrophysiological analyses support the novel hypothesis that chemoattraction to some attractants, like LPA, can occur without hyperpolarization and increased swim speed in Tetrahymena.

Responses of the ciliates tetrahymena and paramecium to vertebrate odorants and tastants.

The ciliates Tetrahymena and Paramecium respond to strong depolarizing stimuli with Ca(2+)-based action potentials, ciliary reversals, and consequent bouts of backward and forward swimming called "avoidance reactions" (ARs). We found that several representative tastants and odorants cause repetitive ARs in Tetrahymena and Paramecium at low (nM to microM) concentrations. Tetrahymena responded well to capsaicin, quinine, quinacrine, denatonium benzoate, eugenol, piperine, chloroquine, carvacrol, allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), and menthol. Chemosensory adaptation was seen with carvacrol, eugenol, quinacrine, and capsaicin. Cross-adaptation was seen between some of these compounds, suggesting possible similarities in their chemosensory transduction or adaptation pathways. Paramecium only responded well to AITC, quinacrine, piperine, and eugenol (with the effective concentration for 50% response [EC(50)] values in the microM range) while chemosensory adaptation was only seen to eugenol in Paramecium, suggesting possible species differences. Tetrahymena and Paramecium may have primitive receptors that can recognize these and other compounds or some of these compounds can act independently of specific receptors.

Targeted gene disruption of dynein heavy chain 7 of Tetrahymena thermophila results in altered ciliary waveform and reduced swim speed.

Tetrahymena thermophila swims by the coordinated beating of hundreds of cilia that cover its body. It has been proposed that the outer arm dyneins of the ciliary axoneme control beat frequency, whereas the inner arm dyneins control waveform. To test the role of one of these inner arms, dynein heavy chain 7 protein (Dyh7p), a knockout mutant was generated by targeted biolistic transformation of the vegetative macronucleus. Disruption of DYH7, the gene which encodes Dyh7p, was confirmed by PCR examination of both genomic and cDNA templates. Both intact and detergent extracted, reactivated cell model preparations of these mutants, which we call DYH7neo3, displayed swim speeds that were almost half that of wild-type cells. Although the DYH7neo3 mutants were slower than wild type, they were able to modulate their swim speed and show ciliary reversal in response to depolarizing stimuli. High-speed video microscopy of intact, free-swimming DYH7neo3 mutants revealed an irregular pattern of ciliary beat and waveform. The mutant cilia appeared to be engaging in less coordinated, swiveling movements in which the typical shape, periodicity and coordination seen in wild-type cilia were absent or disturbed. We propose that the axonemal inner arm dynein heavy chain 7 proteins contribute to the formation of normal ciliary waveform, which in turn governs the forward swimming velocity of these cells.

Responses of the ciliates Tetrahymena and Paramecium to external ATP and GTP.

The unicellular ciliates Paramecium and Tetrahymena are the simplest eukaryotic cells to show reliable depolarizing responses to micromolar concentrations of external ATP and GTP. Their simplicity allows for combined analysis of swimming behavior, electrophysiology, receptor binding, behavioral mutant and drug screens as well as molecular genetic approaches such as RNAi and gene knockouts experiments. ATP and GTP are depolarizing chemorepellents in both ciliates, producing measurable receptor potentials and Ca(2+)-based action potentials that are correlated with jerking behaviors called avoiding reactions (AR). GTP also causes repetitive continuous ciliary reversals (CCR) and oscillating plateau depolarizations in Paramecium. Both ciliates show high affinity, saturable external binding of (32)P-GTP and (32)P-ATP but GTP does not compete for ATP binding and vice versa. Chemosensory adaptation occurs after continued exposure (15 min) to these ligands, producing a loss of external binding and forward swimming. However, cells adapted to ATP still bind and respond to GTP and GTP-adapted cells still bind and respond to ATP. This, combined with pharmacological analyses, suggests that there are two separate receptor systems: A metabotropic ATP receptor pathway and a different, novel GTP receptor pathway. A Paramecium mutant (ginA) lacks the GTP-induced oscillating depolarizations but does show AR in GTP, unveiling isolated GTP-receptor potentials for study. An ecto-ATPase is also present that may be involved in inactivation of ATP and GTP signals. Gene knockout experiments are currently underway to determine the roles of the ecto-ATPase and a putative 7-transmembrane spanning receptor in these responses.

PPNDS is an agonist, not an antagonist, for the ATP receptor of Paramecium.

Paramecium represents a simple, eukaryotic model system to study the cellular effects of some neuroactive drugs. They respond to the agonist beta,gamma-methylene ATP with a transient depolarizing receptor potential, Ca(2+)-based action potentials and repetitive bouts of forward and backward swimming called 'avoiding reactions' (AR). In vivo [(32)P]ATP binding assays showed saturable [(32)P]ATP binding with an apparent K(d) of approximately 23 nmol l(-1). Prolonged (15 min) exposure to 25 micro mol l(-1) beta,gamma-methylene ATP caused behavioral adaptation and losses of AR, ATP receptor potentials and [(32)P]ATP binding. While screening various ATP receptor inhibitors, we found that the P2X1 'antagonist' pyridoxal-phosphate naphthylazo-nitro-disulfate (PPNDS) is actually an agonist, producing the same responses as beta,gamma-methylene ATP. [(32)P]ATP binding assays suggest that both agonists may bind to the same site as [(32)P]ATP. Cross-adaptation is also seen between PPNDS and beta,gamma-methylene ATP in terms of losses in AR, depolarizing receptor potentials and [(32)P]ATP binding. We conclude that the inhibition caused by PPNDS in Paramecium is due to agonist-induced desensitization. Either this represents a unique new class of ATP receptors, in which PPNDS is an agonist instead of an antagonist, or PPNDS (and other drugs like it) may actually be an agonist in many other cell types in which prolonged exposure is necessary for inhibition.

Inner arm dynein 1 is essential for Ca++-dependent ciliary reversals in Tetrahymena thermophila.

Cilia in many organisms undergo a phenomenon called ciliary reversal during which the cilia reverse the beat direction, and the cell swims backwards. Ciliary reversal is typically caused by a depolarizing stimulus that ultimately leads to a rise in intraciliary Ca++ levels. It is this increase in intraciliary Ca++ that triggers ciliary reversal. However, the mechanism by which an increase in intraciliary Ca++ causes ciliary reversal is not known. We have previously mutated the DYH6 gene of Tetrahymena thermophila by targeted gene knockout and shown that the knockout mutants (KO6 mutants) are missing inner arm dynein 1 (I1). In this study, we show that KO6 mutants do not swim backward in response to depolarizing stimuli. In addition to being unable to swim backwards, KO6 mutants swim forward at approximately one half the velocity of wild-type cells. However, the ciliary beat frequency in KO6 mutants is indistinguishable from that of wild-type cells, suggesting that the slow forward swimming of KO6 mutants is caused by an altered waveform rather than an altered beat frequency. Live KO6 cells are also able to increase and decrease their swim speeds in response to stimuli, suggesting that some aspects of their swim speed regulation mechanisms are intact. Detergent-permeabilized KO6 mutants fail to undergo Ca++-dependent ciliary reversals and do not show Ca++-dependent changes in swim speed after MgATP reactivation, indicating that the axonemal machinery required for these responses is insensitive to Ca++ in KO6 mutants. We conclude that Tetrahymena inner arm dynein 1 is not only an essential part of the Ca++-dependent ciliary reversal mechanism but it also may contribute to Ca++-dependent changes in swim speed and to the formation of normal waveform during forward swimming.